When German Chancellor Angela Merkel steps down in September, she will leave behind a conservative party that has been a practically unchallenged political force in Germany for 16 years and leads political polls by a towering 15 percentage points.
And yet the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) might thank her today by electing as its new leader one of her longest-standing political rivals, a man who represents a return to the pre-Merkel past not just in terms of ideological values, but also style of leadership.
Millionaire lawyer Friedrich Merz, who was sacked by Merkel as the leader of the CDU’s parliamentary group in 2002, is the favorite among party supporters to take the center-right into the federal elections on Sept. 28 that will decide who succeeds Merkel as Germany’s chancellor.
The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) have nominated German Minister of Finance Olaf Scholz as its candidate; the Greens are expected to put forward one of coleaders Robert Habeck and Annalena Baerbock.
Among the wider population, Merz is seen as a divisive figure harking back to the CDU’s neoliberal era, someone more likely to drive centrist voters loyal to Merkel into the arms of the Greens or the center-left SPD than his CDU rivals Armin Laschet and Norbert Rottgen.
At the party’s digital congress yesterday and today, the future leadership of the CDU is to be decided by 1,001 delegates from the party’s local, regional and state associations, who have to square ideological nostalgia with realpolitik.
‘RETURN TO PAST’
Merz remains the candidate to beat.
“A CDU led by Friedrich Merz will mean a CDU in opposition, but that is the price a lot of delegates seem willing to pay to get back to the unfiltered CDU of old,” said one member of parliament and Rottgen supporter.
Laschet, the folksy state premier of North-Rhine Westphalia, appeared the obvious continuity candidate after Merkel’s protege Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer announced her resignation as CDU chair in February last year after struggling to assert her authority over a party rebellion in the east.
However, while Laschet enjoys high approval ratings in Germany’s most populous state and the tacit support of the party headquarters, he has struggled to dismiss doubts about his readiness for the national, let alone international stage.
Alarm bells went off for some at last year’s Munich security conference, when Laschet insisted on speaking in German on an English-language panel debate on the future of the EU, cutting a timid figure.
The 59-year-old candidate’s management of the COVID-19 pandemic in North-Rhine Westphalia has exacerbated such concerns, with “lassez-faire Laschet” attracting more criticism for his leadership than have the leaders of states with more severe outbreaks of the disease.
“If he can’t assert himself against 15 other German states, how is he going to cope against 26 other countries in the EU?” asked one former supporter.
Rottgen, the other leading candidate, a former minister of the environment and current chair of the Bundestag’s foreign affairs committee, started out as the outsider in the three-horse race, but maneuvered himself into second place in the polls with a digitally savvy campaign that tries to balance Merkel’s consensual domestic stance with a more proactive foreign policy agenda.
If Rottgen can gain more than one-third of votes in the first round of voting today, his supporters are hopeful that he could rally enough support to clinch the leadership in a run-off.
TACTICS OF 2020
While Laschet gave news conference after news conference on lockdown restrictions last year, and Rottgen raced from chat show to chat show, Merz’s campaign appeared to have run out of steam.
Occasional interventions — an interview in which he appeared to associate homosexuality with pedophilia and an attack on his own party leadership that reminded some of US President Donald Trump — alienated not just some voters, but also members of his own party.
Yet he spent much of last year behind the scenes, calling up delegates for informal chats and even ringing his rivals on their birthdays.
To many German conservatives, Merz holds the promise of a clearly identifiable political stance, after two decades under a leader whose pragmatism has seen her cross her party’s old red lines on nuclear power, immigration and Europe-wide debt-sharing.
In two TV debates, Merz was often the quickest to respond with a short yes or no answer.
He has famously argued that tax returns should be so simple as to fit on a beer mat.
His old-fashioned brand of conservatism has won him admirers not just among seasoned delegates, but also younger CDU politicians, such as Christoph Ploss, the party’s 35-year-old chairman in the cosmopolitan city of Hamburg.
“In recent years we have seen a political polarization on the fringes of the political spectrum,” Ploss told reporters. “Under Merz, that polarization would be relocated to the center.”
Critics say that Merz’s straight-talking image is a mirage. The 65-year-old has campaigned on the promise to make Germany’s economic model more environmentally sustainable and described climate change as a “mega subject” in a recent op-ed for Der Spiegel, but has been more specific on the bans he would avoid than the policies he would introduce.
On Europe, Merz’s position has been “consistently and tactically ambiguous,” said Lucas Guttenberg, deputy director of the Jacques Delors Centre think tank.
“He will rarely take an unequivocal stance on European initiatives like the pandemic recovery fund, but only say that the EU walks a ‘very fine line’ with financial rescue packages,” Guttenberg said.
“Such comments are designed as a nod to the considerable number of Christian Democrats who have grown distrustful of other member states during the Merkel era,” he said.
“And as long as the CDU maintains its fear of Germany being cheated by the rest of Europe, any steps towards further integration are only going to take place under extreme pressure,” he said.
DOUBTFUL APPEAL
Merz’s backers concede that their candidate’s divisive views could drive liberal CDU voters into the arms of a buoyant and centrist German Green party. In turn, they hope, his views on immigration and market liberalization could win back voters who have drifted off to the far-right Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) — a presumption that pollsters question.
“There isn’t much the CDU can win back from the fringes of the right,” said Manfred Gullner, director of the Forsa Institute for Social Research. “The AfD has risen mainly on the back of votes previously allocated to other small far-right parties and anti-democratic non-voters, who are unlikely to suddenly turn into Christian Democrats. If anything, Merz as CDU leader will increase the chances of Germany being run by a left-wing coalition.”
If Merz were to emerge triumphant in today’s vote, he is likely to also go on to anoint himself as his party’s official candidate for the September federal elections.
With Laschet and Rottgen, the situation could be less clear-cut.
There is no constitutional limit on how long a German chancellor can stay in office, but Merkel has repeatedly said that she does not want to serve a fifth term, a message she reiterated in her televised New Year’s speech two weeks ago.
State elections in Baden-Wurttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate on March 14 will serve as an early indicator of whether one of the three candidates can fill the vacuum of authority created by her looming departure.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers