British Prime Minister Boris Johnson plans to visit India next month to promote the D10 summit of democracies he proposed in May, inviting Australia, India and South Korea to participate in next year’s G7 summit with Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the US.
This is similar to US president-elect Joe Biden’s promise of a global democracy summit within the first year of his presidency.
Both ideas are to enhance collaboration between countries with similar values to defend democracy and freedom against the challenging authoritarian expansion and democratic regression of China’s sharp power.
Biden wants a “summit of democracy,” rather than a “summit of democracies,” which gives the US flexibility when deciding who to invite. The intention is to increase participation by making it possible to include countries that have been criticized as flawed democracies, such as Peru and the Philippines, allowing them to participate as long as their governments continue to claim to be democratic.
This also opens a door for Taiwan, as the nation’s diplomatic agencies can negotiate with the US to facilitate participation in a model similar to the APEC Informal Leaders’ Meeting, avoiding the country requirement.
As the US, Europe and other countries have been hard hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, China’s “grand external propaganda” strategy deliberately criticizes democracy for being incompetent and inferior to authoritarianism. Taiwan is one of the democracies that has far outperformed China in all aspects of pandemic response and economic growth, showing that Beijing’s propaganda is a lie.
As Biden has declared that the US wants to restore its leadership position, and protect and promote global democracy, he clearly should not ignore Taiwan’s existence.
In particular, Taiwan can be said to be on the front line of on the fight against the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) authoritarian expansion.
If the international community remains inactive after watching China destroy Hong Kong’s freedom by enforcing the National Security Law in the territory, Beijing will regard its actions as effective and successful.
As Antony Blinken, Biden’s pick for US secretary of state, warned in August when discussing China’s suppression of freedoms in Hong Kong: “If China is getting signals of impunity, then one’s concern is it may think it can do the same with regard to Taiwan.”
In the past few months, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army has sent fighter jets near Taiwan almost daily, attempting to use “gray zone” tactics to exhaust and eventually subdue Taiwan.
If authoritarian China were to annex democratic Taiwan by force, the US’ prestige as the big brother in Asia and the world would be wiped out.
Taiwan is threatened by Chinese military force and needs the support of the US and other democracies. Participation in the Summit of Democracy can bolster ties between Taiwan and countries with shared values, which can counterbalance the CCP’s increasing threat to peace and freedom, and ensure that China’s intimidation of Taiwan fails.
As it would be impossible for autocratic China to participate in the Summit of Democracy, perhaps Taiwan’s president would be allowed informal participation as the leader of a democratic government.
Even if the US, out of concern of irritating China, hoped that Taiwan’s participation would follow the APEC model of sending a representative appointed by the president, that would still be of great significance to Taiwan.
Chen Shih-min is an associate professor at National Taiwan University’s political science department.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers