The future of coal looks like an ice cream truck parked half a kilometer down a mine shaft in China’s Shanxi Province. The yellow-and-white vehicle is equipped with a 5G router from Huawei Technologies to gather data for the mine’s control center, where technicians monitor high-definition feeds on a screen the size of a two-story house.
They are tracking temperature and methane concentrations, while keeping watch over the black lumps zipping along conveyor belts on the way up to waiting trucks.
The data collection would previously have been done by workers down in the pit, but Yangquan Coal Industry Group has managed to eliminate some of those workers and virtualize the least appealing aspect of mine labor.
Illustration: Louise Ting
“It will take time, but in the future, miners will wear suits and white shirts,” said Han Weihai, manager of Huawei’s mine projects in Shanxi. “People no longer want to work in a mine, especially young people with college degrees.”
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in September announced that China would be carbon neutral by 2060, he gave coal a four-decade transition.
Perhaps coal would have a longer transition if China’s vast and politically powerful coal industry can find a way to capture the planet-warming pollution generated by burning the fuel, or find other ways around the national policy.
The long transition buys China time to use up its vast coal resources and figure out how to gradually shut down an industry that still employs, directly and indirectly, tens of millions of people.
Nowhere shows this high-tech trajectory for China’s coal sector better than the Xinyuan mine.
A NEW GENERATION
Next-generation mining jobs pay as much as 100,000 yuan (US$15,300) per year, which is more than miners of previous generations could have dreamed of making. For some workers, that salary is for sitting behind a desk at a facility that looks like a college campus, with a basketball court, a table tennis facility and a library. The company organizes outdoor movie nights in the summer, and running races in the spring and autumn.
The operation produces about 2.2 million tonnes of coal per year, less than one-10th of a percent of China’s demand. That much coal could generate as much as 5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide when it is burned, even as Xinyuan employs emission-reducing techniques such as using methane instead of coal in its boilers.
Coal’s long exit is part of a two-speed approach proposed by climate scientists at Tsinghua University. Citing the inertia of energy and economic systems, they proposed allowing coal power plants to continue being built until about 2030, when China will be richer and replacement technologies would have advanced. The plan then calls for the ongoing transition to solar and nuclear to accelerate sharply.
Easing off coal slowly would reduce abrupt shocks that risk bringing unrest, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) biggest nightmare, by dulling the inevitable pain to China’s army of coal workers.
“The industry will cut jobs, but it should be slow and gradual,” said Wang Haigang, deputy general manager at the Xinyuan mine.
His mine had 3,000 workers in 2012, and by 2025 plans to have fewer than 1,000.
“It might take a long time, but we’re aiming for a future in which no workers need to work underground,” Wang added.
LOGISTICAL HEADACHE
Keeping coal alive while reducing the number of miners might also solve another headache for China, where climate policies governing 1.4 billion people are planned in Beijing, but need to be implemented by dozens of local governments.
The central government has long struggled with the question of how to get local officials to embrace plans for restructuring industries that many of those officials rely on for income.
New mining technology would allow provincial governments to keep earning money that could be used to develop post-coal industries.
That is happening in Jinzhong, the city nearest the Xinyuan mine, which in 2018 invested 11.5 billion yuan on a medical research center, an industrial park for logistics companies and other major projects.
Chinese state-owned utilities are betting on coal’s longevity by building new coal-fired power plants, with their fleets set to expand about 10 percent by 2025.
Just last year, China opened the US$30 billion Haoji Railway line, a 2,000km conduit to haul 180 million tonnes of coal per year directly from central mining basins to energy-hungry regions in the southeast.
However, the coal industry and local governments that support it might be too optimistic about the remaining timeline. China needs to stop building coal power plants immediately if it wants to meet the 2060 pledge, the Draworld Environment Research Center and the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air said.
That goal would require whittling China’s coal fleet down to 680 gigawatts (GW) by 2030, a reversal of the 1,300GW expansion currently planned.
Before long, an uncomfortable truth could push to the forefront: China’s national target of reaching net-zero emissions might not be compatible with another generation of coal.
The climate researchers and the coal industry envision two parallel universes. In one, the use of fossil fuels is drastically reduced and China pivots quickly to renewable energy. In the other, coal is phased out slowly as new technologies are used to reduce their environmental effects.
China’s coal bosses know that their regions might struggle to recover if the first scenario comes to pass.
In the northeastern city of Fuxin, locals have been extracting coal since the 1700s. When the CCP took over in 1949, then-Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) made Fuxin central to his efforts to modernize the nation. Working the mines was an economic necessity, but also a source of patriotic pride.
Coal owned the city. At its peak, more than 500,000 of the city’s 700,000 residents either worked for the mining bureau or were family members.
The bureau ran hospitals, schools and sports facilities. Everything revolved around the Haizhou mine, the largest open-pit coal resource in Asia.
By 2005, easy-to-reach fuel was tapped out and the mine declared bankruptcy. Thousands of workers were dismissed with little money.
For three days, they protested in the streets, lining the road that led to the city’s administration, said Zhu Yu, who had been working at the mine for eight years at the time.
He eventually received a severance package equal to about three month’s wages. After the mine went through a restructuring, he managed to get a job there, with a severe pay cut, but older workers and those who could not pass a health check were not so lucky.
“They had no other skills, no education and no preparation. If the mine that they worked for all their life won’t hire them, how could they expect other companies to?” he said, gazing at the defunct mine, which has been turned into a museum. “We sacrificed our health and our youth for a job that’s supposed to last our whole lives, but suddenly we’re told the promise is no longer valid?”
Fuxin is still struggling to adapt.
PROLONGING FATE
From the rim of the Haizhou pit, wind turbines can still be seen on a distant hill, sounding both a note of hope for the future and a death knell for the resource that built the city.
Manufacturing and technological advances, driven largely by Chinese factories, have lowered the cost of wind and solar power to a point where they are competitive or even cheaper than coal without subsidies.
However, assembling solar panels and wind turbine parts is not generating as many jobs as mining did.
From Shanxi, where the high-tech mine is located, to such other heavyweight coal regions as Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi and Xinjiang, local officials are trying to figure out how to avoid Fuxin’s fate for as long as possible.
In China, it is not corporate dynasties like Koch Industries that are lobbying for fossil fuels, it’s provincial party leaders and heads of state-owned enterprises. These local figures rely on the industry to generate jobs and economic growth, and to maintain their power and personal wealth.
They are people such as Chen Jinxing (陳進行), former chairman of China Datang Group, one of the country’s biggest coal power generators.
Chen started out as a worker at a coal plant in Shandong Province and spent 40 years rising through the ranks at various state-owned power companies before becoming a top government adviser.
In May, he told China Electric Power News, a trade publication, that coal should play a “foundational role” in stabilizing China’s power supply to help “make sure China is self-sufficient and will never be controlled by others.”
That is an argument that the industry has used for years to lobby for more government support, and one that has gained credence as China becomes increasingly isolated on the global stage.
GROWING POPULISM
At the CCP’s National People’s Congress in May, delegates from China’s coal industry submitted proposals that centered on the fuel’s role in providing “energy security,” a term gaining popularity amid growing nationalism.
There is a good reason for the coal industry to think that it can find a way to coexist with the 2060 pledge — the industry has done it before.
When Xi began pursuing more progressive climate policies five years ago, companies began upgrading their plants to trap more of the small particulates that generate smog, and to produce more electricity from every tonne of coal that they burn.
Chinese power companies now brag that their best coal-fired power plants are on the same environmental level as some gas-fired power plants.
They are also banking on technology breakthroughs in areas such as carbon capture and sequestration, which traps and stores the greenhouse gases emitted when coal is burned, to help achieve carbon neutrality.
China is running demonstration projects using the expensive technology, and top researchers have said that they want to scale up to offer an alternative to clean-energy storage as a reliable around-the-clock power source.
Climate experts are wary of both approaches, which seek to mitigate carbon emissions instead of actually eliminating them, but it might be the best that China can do for the foreseeable future.
At least that is what Wang is hoping.
“Coal cannot be replaced in a short period, even if it will one day disappear from our society,” he said.
Additional reporting by Colum Murphy and James Mayger
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS