Hakka TV and Taiwan Indigenous Television (TITV) used to be the only [non-Mandarin] mother-tongue TV stations in Taiwan, while there was no TV station dedicated to Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), the mother tongue of the nation’s largest ethnic group, until the establishment of PTS Taigi, a digital TV station operated by the Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation (PTS) that is the nation’s first around-the-clock channel dedicated to Hoklo.
At first, PTS Taigi did not have a clearly defined organizational structure or level in the governmental hierarchy. The board of directors at the time approved a temporary structure based on that of the PTS Main Channel, with ministerial-level departments set up under the station’s director, making the PTS Taigi director equal to the Hakka TV and TITV directors, which was reasonable and legal.
At the end of last month, the outgoing board of directors passed the Organic Regulations of PTS Taigi under Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation (財團法人公共電視文化事業基金會臺語頻道組織規程). Under the regulations, PTS Taigi is funded by a PTS project budget subsidized by the Ministry of Culture, thus downgrading the station’s status from that of a ministerial-level unit to an internal PTS unit, and making the station’s director an internal PTS manager.
The new regulations require the head of PTS Taigi, although still called a “director,” to be appointed through the same public selection procedure used for the Hakka TV and TITV directors, even though the existing regulations do not require other PTS managers below that of vice president to undergo public selection.
The PTS Taigi organic regulations are causing language discrimination, as the public would get the impression that the government considers Taiwanese and PTS Taigi to be less important than other local languages. Requiring the PTS Taigi director to undergo public selection means PTS Taigi must meet the standards for higher-level organizations while being given a lower status.
Not only will this have a negative impact on the development of PTS Taigi, it also contravenes the guiding principle of language equality enshrined in the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法).
Another inequity is that PTS Taigi does not have an advisory committee, like Hakka TV and TITV, whose advisory committees are composed of experts familiar with Hakka and Aboriginal affairs in media and mass communications.
These experts ensure that the channels’ operations do not deviate from the guidelines. A proposal to establish an advisory committee for PTS Taigi was put forward, but quickly rejected.
The PTS board members might not have expertise in Taiwanese communications or a deep understanding of the task of language revitalization ascribed to an ethnic/language TV station. When making decisions, they might ignore this task, which is a crucial one for ethnic/language TV stations.
The PTS board of directors should promptly revise the organic regulations for PTS Taigi and restore its original status to match that of other ethnic TV stations, while the board of directors should promptly establish an advisory committee for PTS Taigi to ensure the quality of its operations and to help it shoulder the responsibility bestowed upon it by the Development of National Languages Act.
Ho Hsin-han is an associate professor in the National Taichung University of Education department of Taiwanese languages and literature. Zheng An-zhu is a member of the Ministry of Education’s National Language Education Promotion Committee. Tan Hong-hui is CEO of the Li-kang Khioh Taiwanese Foundation.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS