Hakka TV and Taiwan Indigenous Television (TITV) used to be the only [non-Mandarin] mother-tongue TV stations in Taiwan, while there was no TV station dedicated to Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), the mother tongue of the nation’s largest ethnic group, until the establishment of PTS Taigi, a digital TV station operated by the Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation (PTS) that is the nation’s first around-the-clock channel dedicated to Hoklo.
At first, PTS Taigi did not have a clearly defined organizational structure or level in the governmental hierarchy. The board of directors at the time approved a temporary structure based on that of the PTS Main Channel, with ministerial-level departments set up under the station’s director, making the PTS Taigi director equal to the Hakka TV and TITV directors, which was reasonable and legal.
At the end of last month, the outgoing board of directors passed the Organic Regulations of PTS Taigi under Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation (財團法人公共電視文化事業基金會臺語頻道組織規程). Under the regulations, PTS Taigi is funded by a PTS project budget subsidized by the Ministry of Culture, thus downgrading the station’s status from that of a ministerial-level unit to an internal PTS unit, and making the station’s director an internal PTS manager.
The new regulations require the head of PTS Taigi, although still called a “director,” to be appointed through the same public selection procedure used for the Hakka TV and TITV directors, even though the existing regulations do not require other PTS managers below that of vice president to undergo public selection.
The PTS Taigi organic regulations are causing language discrimination, as the public would get the impression that the government considers Taiwanese and PTS Taigi to be less important than other local languages. Requiring the PTS Taigi director to undergo public selection means PTS Taigi must meet the standards for higher-level organizations while being given a lower status.
Not only will this have a negative impact on the development of PTS Taigi, it also contravenes the guiding principle of language equality enshrined in the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法).
Another inequity is that PTS Taigi does not have an advisory committee, like Hakka TV and TITV, whose advisory committees are composed of experts familiar with Hakka and Aboriginal affairs in media and mass communications.
These experts ensure that the channels’ operations do not deviate from the guidelines. A proposal to establish an advisory committee for PTS Taigi was put forward, but quickly rejected.
The PTS board members might not have expertise in Taiwanese communications or a deep understanding of the task of language revitalization ascribed to an ethnic/language TV station. When making decisions, they might ignore this task, which is a crucial one for ethnic/language TV stations.
The PTS board of directors should promptly revise the organic regulations for PTS Taigi and restore its original status to match that of other ethnic TV stations, while the board of directors should promptly establish an advisory committee for PTS Taigi to ensure the quality of its operations and to help it shoulder the responsibility bestowed upon it by the Development of National Languages Act.
Ho Hsin-han is an associate professor in the National Taichung University of Education department of Taiwanese languages and literature. Zheng An-zhu is a member of the Ministry of Education’s National Language Education Promotion Committee. Tan Hong-hui is CEO of the Li-kang Khioh Taiwanese Foundation.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry