The early 1990s Hollywood science fiction blockbuster Universal Soldier featured part-cyborg, part-genetically enhanced “super soldiers.” Three decades later, China appears to be taking its first step toward making biologically enhanced troops a reality.
US Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe made the claim in an opinion piece, titled “China is national security threat No. 1,” published on Thursday last week by the Wall Street Journal.
Ratcliffe wrote that China is developing “world-class capabilities in emerging technologies” and US intelligence shows this includes “conducting human testing on members of the People’s Liberation Army [PLA] in the hope of developing soldiers with biologically enhanced capabilities.”
Some have dismissed the claim as alarmist and an attempt by US President Donald Trump to bolster his administration’s “tough-on-China” legacy. Although the Trump administration has not provided evidence to back up Ratcliffe’s claim, there are strong indications that China is moving in this direction, which should worry Taiwan’s military.
In November 2018, US-educated Chinese biophysics researcher He Jiankui (賀建奎) sparked controversy after announcing he had carried out the world’s first known instance of gene editing on humans, removing a gene from twin babies to make them immune to HIV. He was subsequently fined and sentenced to three years in jail for breaching China’s ban on genetic experiments on humans.
However, on Oct. 8 last year, US think tank the Jamestown Foundation published a paper titled “China’s military biotech frontier,” in which the authors showed that China is at the forefront of research into an advanced technique for gene editing called CRISPR-Cas9, and is exploring its military applications.
“While the potential leveraging of CRISPR to increase human capabilities on the future battlefield remains only a hypothetical possibility at the present, there are indications that Chinese military researchers are starting to explore its potential,” they wrote.
The authors concluded that the PLA is also exploring bionic robotics, intelligent exoskeletons and techniques for human-machine collaboration under the government’s national strategy of “military-civil fusion,” which encourages collaboration between universities, private enterprise and the military.
Unfortunately, it appears that the genie might already be out of the bottle, as French Minister of the Armed Forces Florence Parly last week announced that French armed forces have been given permission to begin researching “enhanced soldiers.”
Although France has no immediate plans to develop “invasive” technology for its soldiers, “we must face the facts ... not everyone shares our scruples and we must be prepared for whatever the future holds,” Parly said in an apparent reference to China.
France must find ways to “maintain our operational superiority without turning our backs on our values,” she said.
The Pentagon is also reportedly researching “human enhancement technologies,” while billionaire US technology entrepreneur Elon Musk’s Neuralink is in the early stages of developing computer chip implants to solve ailments and injuries, which could have military applications.
Like France, the US approach appears to be guided by ethical concerns, including the voluntary and reversible nature of human augmentation technologies. Totalitarian states such as China would likely be unencumbered by such concerns.
Taiwan’s military and intelligence community must closely monitor Chinese research into gene editing and other biologically enhanced capabilities, and consider developing a robust ethical framework to allow for comparable Taiwanese research. This would ensure that the nation is at the forefront of next-generation medicine and therapeutics and — crucially — is able to remain militarily competitive with China.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS