Just as Taiwanese were worrying that US president-elect Joe Biden might shift US policy on China and revamp its relationship with Taiwan and Japan, the China-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the world’s largest free-trade agreement, was formally signed on Nov. 15.
Pro-China academics and media have said the partnership would condemn Taiwan to being the “orphan of Asia,” but this is based on a myopic, deep-blue ideology. From a bird’s-eye view, the signing is positive for Taiwan.
When former US president Barak Obama took office in 2009, he inherited the US’ longstanding belief that a rising China would adopt liberal democracy and coexist with the free world.
As China took off, preparations for the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) began. In March 2015, the UK, ignoring Obama’s opposition, joined the China-dominated bank, as did several European nations. In the end, the bank had 57 founding members, outdoing the US-dominated Asian Development Bank.
Beijing’s move angered Washington and it changed Obama’s China policy, leading to the US’ “pivot toward Asia” strategy.
In September 2015, China expert Michael Pillsbury published The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower, in which he expressed regret over the US’ weak China policy. This might have contributed to US President Donald Trump’s win in 2016.
In other words, the AIIB’s establishment was a historic turning point that changed the direction of the world.
The RCEP has been seen as a major achievement in China’s pursuit of economic hegemony in Asia and its significance is of the same magnitude as the AIIB.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was elated about the agreement among China, Japan and South Korea, and at an APEC forum said that China would pursue membership in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
The question is whether Xi’s clear expression of his intentions is to have an effect on Biden. The signing of the RCEP and Xi’s declared intent is likely to have consequences.
First, the signing of the RCEP confirmed China’s economic hegemony in East Asia and it should be a wake-up call for Biden, as it restricts attempts to adjust Trump’s anti-China policy and to decouple the US from China.
The less Biden does to adjust US China policy and the slower he implements changes, the better for Taiwan.
Second, the signing of the agreement means that the global economy is divided into an RCEP group of digital totalitarian states practicing state capitalism and a group of liberal democratic economies led by the US that opposes the China-dominated RCEP.
Competition between these groups is to become increasingly intense, and the importance of the Taiwanese supply chain within the Western group of free economies is to become increasingly clear — and that would benefit Taiwan in the long term.
Third, the US-led and China-led groupings are likely to move from competitive cooperation to full-on competition, before becoming strategic enemies.
During Biden’s presidency, the Asia-Pacific strategy and an East Asian version of NATO are to become vital links in the free world’s global deployments.
A bilateral trade agreement between Taiwan and the US, and free-trade agreements among Asia-Pacific nations are to follow.
This would allow Taiwan to break away from China’s attempt to isolate it, no longer making it an “orphan of Asia.”
The RCEP will benefit Taiwan — we just need to wait and see.
Huang Tien-lin is a former advisory member of the National Security Council.
Translated by Perry Svensson
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS