I recently went through a handicapped experience when my left foot was disabled after an operation rectifying some bone structure problems.
I was in a wheelchair for 10 weeks and had to avail myself of many handicapped facilities across Taipei. I found that such facilities are in somewhat less than perfect condition, although there were some helpful contrivances and assistance as well.
Navigating sidewalks in a wheelchair in Taipei is in the main very difficult. Sidewalks are often very uneven, with many humps, bumps, blockages, obstructions and steep inclines that cannot be scaled alone.
Although many handicapped inclines leading up to buildings are in fairly good condition — and are for the most part in existence — just as many are not well kept, with hindrances and broken groundwork limiting access. This is a fundamental problem that needs to be addressed.
At the same time, though not a huge problem, doorways with rails at the base are a bit of a deterrent when trying to enter rooms. It is a lot easier when these are not present. Small ramps allowing people into and out of the front doors of buildings would also be an improvement.
The people of Taipei were certainly kind and cooperative with handicapped people, right down to people hopping out of elevators to let me board. My own students at the National Taipei University of Business helped me in the hallways many times. MRT drivers often held trains for a few seconds longer while my wife and I entered cars. More than once people on the street assisted us when we encountered a rough patch that almost had me spilling out of my chair.
To be sure, one of the most accommodating and useful aids we happened upon was the availability of handicapped taxis, which allow wheelchairs to be taken wholly into the cab, with the rider in the chair, in the back. These proved very safe, with the drivers affixing the chairs firmly, looping a seat belt over my body, and then carrying me away safely and comfortably. A lot more agreeable than having to climb out of a chair, fold it into the back of the taxi, and boarding into the back seat.
These were in general very accessible — although at certain times they are in great demand and might be less available — and the drivers were very polite and helpful.
I never had to take a bus in my wheelchair, but I have viewed this happening a few times in Taipei. For the most part it looked like facilities were usable and present — although not I think in all buses.
My experience as a handicapped person was not all bad, and facilities and access in Taipei seem to be fairly well designed and controlled.
However, there are some difficulties — a lack of good facilities and less than easy access, and the uneven sidewalks remain a problem — which need to be addressed.
David Pendery is an associate professor at the National Taipei University of Business.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS