I recently went through a handicapped experience when my left foot was disabled after an operation rectifying some bone structure problems.
I was in a wheelchair for 10 weeks and had to avail myself of many handicapped facilities across Taipei. I found that such facilities are in somewhat less than perfect condition, although there were some helpful contrivances and assistance as well.
Navigating sidewalks in a wheelchair in Taipei is in the main very difficult. Sidewalks are often very uneven, with many humps, bumps, blockages, obstructions and steep inclines that cannot be scaled alone.
Although many handicapped inclines leading up to buildings are in fairly good condition — and are for the most part in existence — just as many are not well kept, with hindrances and broken groundwork limiting access. This is a fundamental problem that needs to be addressed.
At the same time, though not a huge problem, doorways with rails at the base are a bit of a deterrent when trying to enter rooms. It is a lot easier when these are not present. Small ramps allowing people into and out of the front doors of buildings would also be an improvement.
The people of Taipei were certainly kind and cooperative with handicapped people, right down to people hopping out of elevators to let me board. My own students at the National Taipei University of Business helped me in the hallways many times. MRT drivers often held trains for a few seconds longer while my wife and I entered cars. More than once people on the street assisted us when we encountered a rough patch that almost had me spilling out of my chair.
To be sure, one of the most accommodating and useful aids we happened upon was the availability of handicapped taxis, which allow wheelchairs to be taken wholly into the cab, with the rider in the chair, in the back. These proved very safe, with the drivers affixing the chairs firmly, looping a seat belt over my body, and then carrying me away safely and comfortably. A lot more agreeable than having to climb out of a chair, fold it into the back of the taxi, and boarding into the back seat.
These were in general very accessible — although at certain times they are in great demand and might be less available — and the drivers were very polite and helpful.
I never had to take a bus in my wheelchair, but I have viewed this happening a few times in Taipei. For the most part it looked like facilities were usable and present — although not I think in all buses.
My experience as a handicapped person was not all bad, and facilities and access in Taipei seem to be fairly well designed and controlled.
However, there are some difficulties — a lack of good facilities and less than easy access, and the uneven sidewalks remain a problem — which need to be addressed.
David Pendery is an associate professor at the National Taipei University of Business.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other