I recently went through a handicapped experience when my left foot was disabled after an operation rectifying some bone structure problems.
I was in a wheelchair for 10 weeks and had to avail myself of many handicapped facilities across Taipei. I found that such facilities are in somewhat less than perfect condition, although there were some helpful contrivances and assistance as well.
Navigating sidewalks in a wheelchair in Taipei is in the main very difficult. Sidewalks are often very uneven, with many humps, bumps, blockages, obstructions and steep inclines that cannot be scaled alone.
Although many handicapped inclines leading up to buildings are in fairly good condition — and are for the most part in existence — just as many are not well kept, with hindrances and broken groundwork limiting access. This is a fundamental problem that needs to be addressed.
At the same time, though not a huge problem, doorways with rails at the base are a bit of a deterrent when trying to enter rooms. It is a lot easier when these are not present. Small ramps allowing people into and out of the front doors of buildings would also be an improvement.
The people of Taipei were certainly kind and cooperative with handicapped people, right down to people hopping out of elevators to let me board. My own students at the National Taipei University of Business helped me in the hallways many times. MRT drivers often held trains for a few seconds longer while my wife and I entered cars. More than once people on the street assisted us when we encountered a rough patch that almost had me spilling out of my chair.
To be sure, one of the most accommodating and useful aids we happened upon was the availability of handicapped taxis, which allow wheelchairs to be taken wholly into the cab, with the rider in the chair, in the back. These proved very safe, with the drivers affixing the chairs firmly, looping a seat belt over my body, and then carrying me away safely and comfortably. A lot more agreeable than having to climb out of a chair, fold it into the back of the taxi, and boarding into the back seat.
These were in general very accessible — although at certain times they are in great demand and might be less available — and the drivers were very polite and helpful.
I never had to take a bus in my wheelchair, but I have viewed this happening a few times in Taipei. For the most part it looked like facilities were usable and present — although not I think in all buses.
My experience as a handicapped person was not all bad, and facilities and access in Taipei seem to be fairly well designed and controlled.
However, there are some difficulties — a lack of good facilities and less than easy access, and the uneven sidewalks remain a problem — which need to be addressed.
David Pendery is an associate professor at the National Taipei University of Business.
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
Owing to the combined majority of the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the legislature last week voted to further extend the current session to the end of next month, prolonging the session twice for a total of 211 days, the longest in Taiwan’s democratic history. Legally, the legislature holds two regular sessions annually: from February to May, and from September to December. The extensions pushed by the opposition in May and last week mean there would be no break between the first and second sessions this year. While the opposition parties said the extensions were needed to
RSS