Tropical Storm Atsani was the only storm this year for which the Central Weather Bureau issued a land warning. Since 1949, the bureau has issued typhoon warnings for only 17 typhoons and tropical storms in November, which is an average of one warning every four years.
Everyone was hoping that Atsani would replenish the water levels of reservoirs in central and southern Taiwan, but the storm did not live up to expectations.
The Water Resources Agency used land-based cloud seeding in an attempt to increase rainfall over reservoirs, but it did not use airborne cloud seeding, which is more effective.
This was because the government did not dispatch transport planes, due to unpredictable risks associated with the storm.
Taiwan has experienced abnormal weather this year, causing water resources to diminish rapidly. As a result, reservoirs in central and southern areas, which are normally full or close to full in October, are actually less than one-third full.
For example, Taiwan’s largest reservoir — Zengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫) in Chiayi County — is at only 23 percent of its capacity, compared with 77 percent at the same time last year and 78 percent the year before.
The government has reduced or cut off water supplies for the second rice crop and diverted it for household and industrial use, but if no more tropical storms or typhoons visit Taiwan before the end of this year, Taiwanese will somehow have to get through the four months before next year’s spring and summer rains arrive. Everyone in Taiwan had better wake up to the threat of a worsening drought.
The heavens only give people so much water, even at the best of times, so everyone must comply with national water resource allocations by using water sparingly.
It is hard to go from extravagance to frugality, so everyone in Taiwan should to try hard to reduce unnecessary use of water. Let us revive the Taiwanese tradition of frugality and join hands to get through this drought together.
Lai Ming-huang holds a doctorate in engineering from National Cheng Kung University and is a former secretary-general of the Chiayi City Government.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the