Australia is likely to keep suffering economic harm from “repeated rounds of Chinese economic coercion” and needs to find a way to reset the relationship, a former ambassador to Beijing has warned.
Seafood exporters are the latest industry group to report disruptions in accessing the Chinese market and Geoff Raby, the Australian ambassador to China from 2007 to 2011, said that Australia needed China more than the other way around.
Raby, in an interview with the Guardian Australia, argued that Australia had joined itself at the hip with the US over the past few years in seeking to resist China’s rise — an approach he believed went against Australia’s interests.
Illustration: Lance Liu
That is despite the assertions of Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government — including at high-level talks in Washington in July — that Canberra is pursuing its own policy and is not doing anything to injure the important relationship with Beijing.
In a new book published on Tuesday, Raby suggests that Australia’s strategy for managing the rise of China has been “incremental, reactive to others’ agendas, and as such, incoherent.”
He also said that talk about Australia significantly diversifying its economic relationship with China by turning to other markets is “nothing other than wishful thinking.”
The complementarities between the two economies “are so profound that Australia’s economic dependency on China will not change” unless Australians choose to accept a major cut in their living standards, according to the book, China’s Grand Strategy and Australia’s Future in the New Global Order.
“Canberra hates this, but I start with the premise that it’s an asymmetrical relationship [and] whether we like it or not, we need China more than they need us,” Raby, who is also a former Australian ambassador to the WTO, said in the interview.
“It’s not a question of who’s right or wrong. Diplomacy and pragmatic foreign policy should be about getting outcomes and results that are in your interests,” he said.
The Australian government has said that it would not bow to economic pressure and is seeking to stand up for its values.
Raby questioned whether Australia’s interests were best served by the current situation, “where we have exposed ourselves to repeated rounds of Chinese economic coercion.”
While Australia should reject China’s economic coercion “that doesn’t mean they’re not going to keep doing it to us and we’re not going to keep paying the price,” he said.
On Monday, the Morrison government called on Beijing to provide certainty to Australian rock lobster exporters, after several shipments were held up by customs authorities for further testing over the weekend.
The Seafood Trade Advisory Group, which represents seafood exporters on trade and market access issues, said that there were positive signs on Monday “with the Chinese authorities undertaking additional testing over the weekend and confirmation that delayed consignments are starting to clear customs.”
The delays had fueled fears that seafood could be the next Australian sector affected by trade tensions with China after barley, beef, cotton, coal and wine were all targeted by official or undeclared trade actions.
While it is difficult to quantify the cost of the trade war, Perth USAsia Centre research showed that the total annual value of exports to China in the five industries affected by declared and undeclared sanctions was US$19 billion.
An additional US$28 billion worth of services exports could be at risk if Beijing’s warnings to its citizens against travel to Australia — based on claims of an elevated risk of racist attacks — prevents a post-COVID-19 recovery in tourism and international education.
Raby likened the Australian government’s approach to the Black Knight, the hapless character from Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
“The Black Knight’s got his arms and legs chopped off and he yells: ‘Come back you chicken.’ We’re a bit like that, and I’m just calling for pragmatic, realist policy,” he said.
Australia needed to think about how it could offer a circuit breaker without selling out its interests, Raby said.
“It needs to be about changing the conversation with China,” he said. “Things that matter most to Beijing, I’d argue from a country like Australia, is recognizing China’s territorial integrity, the legitimacy of the communist party as the governing party of China and China’s ascendancy as a major power in the region and one that needs to be respected for that.”
In the book, Raby wrote that recognition of China’s interests and its party-state are required for Australia to seek opportunities to engage with Beijing on issues such as the environment, water resources, energy, terrorism, transnational crime, cyberwarfare and the militarization of space.
He lays out several other foundations for “a grand strategy” for Australia, including no longer taking for granted the US’ preparedness to defend Australia.
Canberra’s strategy should also include increased investment in Australia’s cultural diplomacy and soft power in the region, and a return to “activist middle-power diplomacy involving coalition building across a range of issues.”
Raby, an ambassador to APEC in the early 2000s, said that regional states should seek common purpose when dealing with China “to remind Beijing that a push against one is a push against all.”
After serving as Canberra’s top diplomat in Beijing for four years, Raby has more recently provided advisory services to Australian and Chinese businesses.
He is registered on the Australian government’s foreign influence transparency scheme as a board member of Yancoal, a resources company that is listed on the Australian stock exchange, but majority-owned by a Chinese state-owned enterprise.
In the book, Raby criticizes the Chinese government over “widespread internment camps” across the Xinjiang region and Xi Jinping’s “increasingly authoritarian control of domestic politics.”
“Having as our major economic partner a willful, difficult, abrasive, but nonetheless brittle and still weak power, one that is more comfortable with tyranny than democracy, but on which Australia’s economic well-being and security in the region rest, is the dystopian future that Australian policymakers will need to learn to navigate,” he wrote.
Raby summarizes the Chinese government’s strategic objectives as security for its borders, respect for its territorial integrity and protecting the continued rule of the communist party.
He wrote that China is “a constrained superpower” that acts as “both a status quo power and a disruptor” and has a range of strategic vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities include China’s heavy dependence on other countries for the resources and energy it needs to fuel its economic growth, leaving it exposed to future disruptions in supply.
There are few coincidences in the world of foreign diplomacy. Two days after a Japanese government donation of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines arrived in Taiwan on Friday last week, a US delegation led by US senators Tammy Duckworth, Dan Sullivan and Chris Coons touched down at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) in a US military transport aircraft, which flew in from Osan Air Base in South Korea. The cross-party delegation of US senators announced that Washington would donate 750,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses to Taiwan in the first wave of the US Foreign Vaccine Sharing Program. Japan and the US’ vaccine donations are
Over the past year, scores of gargantuan Chinese sand dredgers have deployed themselves in territorial waters off the Taiwanese-administered Matsu Islands, where their activities erode beaches and ruin fishing shoals. These Chinese ships are mercenary; a small 5,000 ton ship could sell a load of sand for the equivalent of US$55,000 to Fujian construction firms — or to the People’s Liberation Army for use in building its artificial reefs in the South China Sea. They also frustrate Taiwan’s government, which tries unsuccessfully to cooperate with Beijing on environmental stewardship of their contiguous waters. Each day, Taiwanese Coast Guard vessels can
On Monday last week, a formation of 16 Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes flew over the South China Sea near Malaysian Borneo and intruded into the airspace of Malaysia’s exclusive economic zone. Although it was not the first incursion into Malaysian airspace by Chinese military aircraft, it was the first time such a large formation had been dispatched by China. It was yet another worrying indication that Beijing senses an opportunity to aggressively shape the post-COVID-19 world in its own image and has stepped up its plans to expand the frontiers of its empire well beyond the limits of its