Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland on Monday lambasted Chinese Ambassador to Canada Cong Peiwu (叢培武) for threatening the “health and safety” of Canadians living in Hong Kong. Freeland said that Cong’s thinly veiled threat was “not in any way in keeping with the spirit of appropriate diplomatic relations between two countries.”
Canadian Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole said that Cong should apologize or leave Canada — an understandable response to the ambassador’s diplomatic gaffe. China’s response was to criticize Canadian officials and the media, rather than Cong.
Canadian leaders “did not verify, but also condoned the anti-China comments spreading across the nation and made groundless accusations against China,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian (趙立堅) said.
That Zhao would assume that Canadian leaders have control over what the country’s media and public say about China shows the disconnect between the mentality of China’s communist government and that of Canada’s democratically elected government.
Another example of this was on June 6, 2016, when Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) berated a Canadian journalist during a news conference in Ottawa for asking about human rights in China and the jailing of Canadian Kevin Garratt, who was charged with espionage. Wang told the reporter that she was being “irresponsible” by asking such questions.
“Your question is full of prejudice against China and arrogance... I don’t know where that comes from. This is totally unacceptable,” Wang said, according to a report by the Canadian Broadcasting Corp.
This attitude is not only exhibited toward Canada. Wang threatened Czech Senate President Milos Vystrcil for last month’s visit to Taiwan, and Chinese officials have threatened to arbitrarily detain Americans living in China in retaliation for the US’ detention of Chinese academics suspected of espionage.
“We are aware that the Chinese government has, in other instances, detained American, Canadian and other individuals without legal basis to retaliate against lawful prosecutions and to exert pressure on their governments, with a callous disregard of the individuals involved,” US Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Demers said in a statement, the New York Times reported on Sunday last week.
With China’s threatening of people in democratic countries in the public eye, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration should take advantage of that, and press the governments of other democracies, such as the US, Canada and European countries, to establish formal relations with Taiwan. The government should also have an open door to foreign individuals and firms operating in Hong Kong and China, encouraging them to move their operations to Taiwan.
China often uses its sizeable consumer market as leverage to get away with threatening others, but the message is spreading that access to China’s consumers comes at a great cost, including the safety of foreigners in China, and the need to give the Chinese government access to intellectual property, company secrets and client records. Beijing also often restricts that access at a moment’s notice.
While Taiwan’s market is smaller than China’s, Taipei does not restrict foreign individuals and firms in this way; it does not leverage access to Taiwanese consumers for political ends. Taipei is also a great hub for managing regional operations.
When China becomes diplomatically isolated and loses its leverage, maybe its behavior will change.
Taiwan and its diplomatic friends must move quickly to isolate China, which has become bolder with no significant barriers to its hegemonic behavior. Democracies must also caution their residents about the dangers of operating in communist China — a gross violator of human rights — which regularly detains foreigners at will.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers