New Zealanders today are to be asked to vote “yes” or “no” on whether people enduring “unbearable suffering that cannot be eased” have a legal right to end their life.
For Matt Vickers, the former husband of lawyer and euthanasia campaigner Lecretia Seales, the vote cannot come soon enough.
Lecretia died in 2015 of a brain tumor. Until her death, she and her husband fought tirelessly to make euthanasia legal in New Zealand, as it is in the Netherlands, Belgium, the Australian state of Victoria and some states of the US.
“I am feeling anxious I guess. I am really hopeful we will see a positive result, the polls are certainly looking that way, but opponents are doing their best to confuse, and create doubt and fear,” said Vickers, speaking from New York where he lives with his now wife and baby. “Choice is fundamental to who we are as human beings. When we don’t have choices we feel constrained and I think it’s necessary for people to support this referendum because it does provide choice in situations where most choices have been taken away from them.”
The End of Life Choice Act 2019 was sponsored by ACT New Zealand lawmaker David Seymour. It would allow those with a terminal illness to apply to terminate their life.
Although the act has passed through parliament it would only come into force if more than 50 percent of voters choose “yes” — at the same time as they are voting on a new government and whether to legalize marijuana.
The act outlines the criteria for those who can apply to end their life, including that they be aged 18 or over, are New Zealand citizens, are suffering from a terminal illness that would end their life within six months, “have a significant and ongoing decline in physical capability,” or are “enduring unbearable suffering that cannot be eased” and are in a position to make an “informed decision” about euthanasia.
Those suffering mental illness or decline would not be eligible, nor would those applying solely on the basis of “advanced age” or a disability.
Two doctors — one independent — would have to sign off on the decision, with a psychiatrist called in if either doctor has any doubts.
“We are decades behind the world leaders on end of life choice, and I think it’s time New Zealand moved towards being a more compassionate and tolerant society,” Seymour said. “People continue to suffer in ways that are traumatic. I don’t want to have to suffer on to adhere to the morality of someone else. They’ve got their own body if they want to have a ghastly death.”
For months now polling has shown strong public support for the “yes” vote of about 60 to 70 percent, and it has the backing of New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, opposition New Zealand National Party leader Judith Collins, former prime minister Helen Clark and former attorney general Sir Michael Cullen.
“There is an overriding issue of control and dignity.” Cullen said when fronting a campaign for the “yes” vote.
Cullen has stage 4 cancer.
“It offers to people like me the chance of finishing the life I have enjoyed so much in a way consistent with my moral beliefs and my sense of the dignity of human life,” he said.
However, opponents of the act are determined to keep fighting, saying they fear New Zealand’s most vulnerable people would face coercion or pressure to end their life, influenced by the fear of being a burden.
Those voting no include former New Zealand prime minister Bill English, who is a practicing Catholic, Maori Party coleader John Tamihere and former New Zealand minister for seniors Maggy Barry.
The claim that vulnerable people would be disproportionately impacted by the act has not been supported by multiple reviews of euthanasia legislation in other jurisdictions, which have found the most likely demographic to access it are older, white and well-educated.
Huhana Hickey, 58, is of Maori origin and has a rare form of multiple sclerosis that confines her to a wheelchair. She plans to vote “no” in today’s referendum.
“Throughout this entire debate there has been no discussion with the indigenous people or other cultures. It’s a very Westernized law. If we’re going to allow the state to legally kill its citizens we need to make sure we’re protecting the ones who are already being killed by neglect,” said Hickey, referring to the systemic disadvantage of Maori and the poor state of the public healthcare system. “My concern is we don’t have dignity in living now for the disabled, and Maori are already discriminated against and denied treatment. Why in the middle of a pandemic are we discussing legally killing people?”
Political experts say that in years of unrest and instability voters tend to veer toward conservatism — which could affect the likelihood of both referendum questions passing.
If the euthanasia referendum is successful, it is binding and would come into effect in October next year, regardless of who wins today’s general election.
End-of-Life Choice Society president Mary Panko said that she has witnessed three friends die long, painful deaths of cancer and does not want anyone else to suffer.
Panko said that the act would only provide euthanasia as an option for the sickest in society — the 5 to 6 percent of those at the end of their life for whom palliative care is no longer managing their suffering.
“There is wider movement through the whole medical community now that people should make their own choices — we’re talking about people in great suffering and pain,” Panko said. “I loathe suffering, I loathe watching it in my friends and any sorts of creatures. It helps people to cope with terrible illness if they know they have the option of a peaceful death.”
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big