Against the backdrop of an intensifying situation in the Taiwan Strait, the latest edition of the US Army journal Military Review features an article titled “Drive them into the sea” by former research analyst and Michigan Army National Guard member Brian Dunn.
Dunn suggests permanently garrisoning up to four US Army armored divisions in Taiwan, so that the US leadership would no longer have to worry about whether it has the ability to assist Taiwan in the event of an invasion by China.
Instead of permanently basing armored divisions in Taiwan, it would be far more practical to leverage the existing superiority of the US forces to counter the threat of a Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) invasion.
First, if the US Army were to garrison divisions in Taiwan, it would certainly increase the overall armor and anti-armor strengths of Taiwan’s land forces, but it would also mean that during the opening stages of a conflict, there would be an undeniable risk that not only the Taiwanese units, but also the US divisions would come under fire from PLA guided missiles — and might possibly even be wiped out.
Second, in the event of an invasion by China, the US Air Force and Navy should be employed to destroy the PLA Navy and Rocket Force’s first and second battle lines.
This would entail the US military conducting an air-sea battle prior to or during the initial stages of a Chinese invasion, using a combination of B-1, B-2 or B-52 bombers, and cruise missiles to carry out long-distance strikes against PLA targets.
US air and naval forces would be supported by Taiwanese anti-ship and cruise missiles, which could be used to carry out “fountainhead strikes” on PLA bases within China’s Fujian, Zhejiang and Guangdong provinces within a 400km to 600km radius.
A joint US-Taiwan air-sea battle would deny PLA forces the ability to break out from the “first island chain” and rout the backbone of the PLA’s invasion force.
The political benefits of garrisons of US Army divisions in Taiwan would outweigh any military gain. This is because the US Air Force and Navy still possess absolute superiority over their PLA counterparts and would need to support US ground forces to achieve a relative advantage during battle.
In other words, US air and naval power, together with the Taiwanese military’s guided missile capabilities — not land forces — would provide the mainstay of the nation’s defense against a Chinese invasion.
Ray Song is a graduate of National Chung Cheng University’s Institute of Strategic and International Affairs.
Translated by Edward Jones
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS