Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) on Tuesday posed a question in the Legislative Yuan about the likelihood of imminent war with China. He said that many Taiwanese were concerned about the possibility.
You cannot blame them, given the increasing scale and intensity of China’s military provocations in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait, in addition to many other countries that might support Taiwan against China’s aggression, including the US, being distracted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Minister of National Defense Yen De-fa (嚴德發) said that he did not anticipate this in the foreseeable future, and that Taiwanese forces have not stepped up their alert status. Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), standing next to Yen, added that Beijing would pay a heavy price if it started a war.
This exchange playing out in the nation’s legislature is alarming, and it is exactly what Beijing wants: to intimidate Taiwanese, and sow a sense of fear and confusion among them.
That is not to suggest that the danger is not real.
In an article published on Tuesday titled “Ai Weiwei: ‘Too late’ to curb China’s global influence,” BBC world affairs editor John Simpson said that Hu Xijin (胡錫進), editor-in-chief of China’s state-run tabloid the Global Times, rejects the suggestion that China is an international bully.
Simpson lists a number of countries that might disagree with that sentiment — including Taiwan, Australia, Canada, India, Japan, the UK and the US — and which China is in angry stand-offs with.
The subject of his article was Chinese artist Ai Weiwei (艾未未), whom Simpson quotes as saying that China is now too powerful, and the West too invested in it, for its immense influence in the world to be curbed. Ai does not play a large role in the article, which is more an opportunity for Simpson to outline the exact nature and background of the threat the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) poses to the world. Embedded in the article ostensibly about Ai is Simpson’s own assessment of an interview with Hu.
To provide a reference point that many Western readers instantly understand as a symbol of despotic communist excess, Simpson evokes the name of Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
Taiwanese, and anyone watching the situation in Taiwan closely, understand very well the bullying nature of, and the threat posed by, the CCP.
There is an increasing sense of urgency in the West, not only for leaders to be aware of the threat from China, but for the public to be informed, too. Simpson’s intention in this article is to flesh out the background to this.
China’s image abroad has deteriorated substantially in the past few months. The catalyst has been the COVID-19 pandemic, which has captured people’s attention because of the direct, all-encompassing effect it has had on their lives. There is an awareness that the wolf has crept up to the door, all the while gaslighting its innocence. However, that wolf does not come in the form of the COVID-19 pandemic itself.
The world has been anticipating a pandemic for many years. That it emerged in China should not be blamed on the CCP given the globalized nature of the world. The CCP’s attempts to cover it up, though, ensured that the worst-case scenario happened.
What the pandemic has revealed, due to the scrutiny it has placed on the CCP’s cover-up, is the pernicious activity the CCP is engaged in.
The Taiwan United Nations Alliance is considering proposing a referendum for the nation to join the UN under the name “Taiwan.” That would rile the wolf, and it is no longer interested in playing the nice guy. The proposal is an admirable aspiration, but an unrealistic and dangerous one.
Hopefully, people in foreign nations understand why that is.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US