The ironies of climate change are often cruel. In our warming world, for example, the demand for air conditioning and refrigeration is exploding, especially in developing countries.
However, more air-conditioning units lead to more warming, both from the refrigerant chemicals they contain and the electricity they use.
Globally, cooling can account for up to half of peak electricity demand during the hot season, which is getting longer and longer.
A new report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), based on data gathered by a team we cochaired, shows that the transition to energy-efficient, climate-friendly cooling — using refrigerants that pose a lower global-warming threat — is technically and economically feasible.
Adopting the best currently available technologies for both refrigerants and energy efficiency could eliminate the equivalent of up to 460 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions by 2060, an amount equal to eight years of global greenhouse-gas emissions.
By 2030, emissions equal to those of nearly 1,600 medium-size peak power plants would be avoided.
Eliminating the “super pollutant” refrigerants known as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) is critical, as is increasing the energy efficiency of cooling equipment. Otherwise, emissions from this sector alone could use up the remaining “carbon budget” for capping global warming at the “safe” threshold of 1.5°C relative to pre-industrial times.
Here, the world’s most successful environmental treaty, the Montreal Protocol, is a source of inspiration. The protocol, which was concluded in 1987 and entered into force in 1989, successfully addressed the first great threat to the global atmosphere: that chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants and related gases were destroying Earth’s protective ozone layer.
At the same time, the Montreal Protocol has done more to reduce the climate threat than any other agreement — avoiding warming by an amount equivalent to that caused by all the carbon dioxide emitted in the 20th century, which is more than half of all warming.
These fluorinated gases are also powerful greenhouse gases — or climate super pollutants — with thousands of times more warming power per molecule than carbon dioxide.
By eliminating them, the Montreal Protocol not only put the ozone layer on the path to recovery, but also significantly slowed the development of the climate crisis.
The Montreal Protocol’s most recent mandatory measure is the 2016 Kigali Amendment, which aims to phase out HFCs, used primarily as refrigerants, and avoid up to 0.5°C of warming by 2100.
The amendment’s initial schedule ensures that about 90 percent of this target will be reached.
With the Kigali Amendment, the nearly 200 parties to the Montreal Protocol (including every UN member) also recognized the importance of improving the energy efficiency of air-conditioning units and other cooling equipment during the switch from HFCs to more climate-friendly refrigerants.
Efficiency gains can more than double the Kigali Amendment’s climate benefits by mid-century, while reducing energy generation and transmission costs by nearly US$3 trillion.
They will also reduce consumers’ monthly electricity bills, create jobs for installation and maintenance staff, and, by reducing air pollution, protect public health and agricultural productivity.
The UNEP-IEA report highlights 10 policies that would help to realize these benefits. They include universal ratification of the Kigali Amendment (the milestone of 100 countries was reached in July), national cooling action plans, proven measures like minimum energy-performance standards and building codes, and aggregating demand for sustainable cooling through buyers’ clubs and bulk procurement.
This would help develop sustainable cold chains to reduce food loss and ensure effective vaccine dissemination.
Improving service and maintenance is also essential, as is preventing inefficient air-conditioning units from being dumped in developing countries.
The enormous growth in cooling demand means we must act quickly. Today, an estimated 3.6 billion air conditioners, refrigerators, and related appliances are used worldwide; to meet the world’s cooling needs, that number will more than triple, to 14 billion cooling units, by 2050.
Access to cooling is already becoming a leading climate and social justice issue around the world — especially in the many Asian, African, and South American countries that are subject to increasingly unlivable temperatures and already suffer from poverty, water shortages and other related problems.
For example, only about 7 percent to 9 percent of Indian households have access to air conditioning today, compared with 60 percent in China and 90 percent in the US.
In India alone, demand for air conditioning is expected to grow by more than 1 billion units over the coming decades. During this time, making cooling less polluting will be critical.
Decreasing the cost, as India has done through its innovative bulk procurement program, would also be beneficial.
We should all take courage from the Montreal Protocol’s success in repairing the ozone layer and mitigating more warming from greenhouse gases than any other measure.
All countries must now adopt common-sense initiatives to make cooling more efficient, less emissions-intensive, and more affordable for consumers.
Most urgently, we must heed the latest understanding of the planet’s sensitivity to continuing emissions and recognize that without rapid action, runaway climate change will be far harder to prevent.
Durwood Zaelke is president of the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development and a codirector of the Program on Governance for Sustainable Development at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Mario Molina, a 1995 Nobel laureate in chemistry, is a professor at the University of California, San Diego, and the National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on