The ironies of climate change are often cruel. In our warming world, for example, the demand for air conditioning and refrigeration is exploding, especially in developing countries.
However, more air-conditioning units lead to more warming, both from the refrigerant chemicals they contain and the electricity they use.
Globally, cooling can account for up to half of peak electricity demand during the hot season, which is getting longer and longer.
A new report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), based on data gathered by a team we cochaired, shows that the transition to energy-efficient, climate-friendly cooling — using refrigerants that pose a lower global-warming threat — is technically and economically feasible.
Adopting the best currently available technologies for both refrigerants and energy efficiency could eliminate the equivalent of up to 460 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions by 2060, an amount equal to eight years of global greenhouse-gas emissions.
By 2030, emissions equal to those of nearly 1,600 medium-size peak power plants would be avoided.
Eliminating the “super pollutant” refrigerants known as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) is critical, as is increasing the energy efficiency of cooling equipment. Otherwise, emissions from this sector alone could use up the remaining “carbon budget” for capping global warming at the “safe” threshold of 1.5°C relative to pre-industrial times.
Here, the world’s most successful environmental treaty, the Montreal Protocol, is a source of inspiration. The protocol, which was concluded in 1987 and entered into force in 1989, successfully addressed the first great threat to the global atmosphere: that chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants and related gases were destroying Earth’s protective ozone layer.
At the same time, the Montreal Protocol has done more to reduce the climate threat than any other agreement — avoiding warming by an amount equivalent to that caused by all the carbon dioxide emitted in the 20th century, which is more than half of all warming.
These fluorinated gases are also powerful greenhouse gases — or climate super pollutants — with thousands of times more warming power per molecule than carbon dioxide.
By eliminating them, the Montreal Protocol not only put the ozone layer on the path to recovery, but also significantly slowed the development of the climate crisis.
The Montreal Protocol’s most recent mandatory measure is the 2016 Kigali Amendment, which aims to phase out HFCs, used primarily as refrigerants, and avoid up to 0.5°C of warming by 2100.
The amendment’s initial schedule ensures that about 90 percent of this target will be reached.
With the Kigali Amendment, the nearly 200 parties to the Montreal Protocol (including every UN member) also recognized the importance of improving the energy efficiency of air-conditioning units and other cooling equipment during the switch from HFCs to more climate-friendly refrigerants.
Efficiency gains can more than double the Kigali Amendment’s climate benefits by mid-century, while reducing energy generation and transmission costs by nearly US$3 trillion.
They will also reduce consumers’ monthly electricity bills, create jobs for installation and maintenance staff, and, by reducing air pollution, protect public health and agricultural productivity.
The UNEP-IEA report highlights 10 policies that would help to realize these benefits. They include universal ratification of the Kigali Amendment (the milestone of 100 countries was reached in July), national cooling action plans, proven measures like minimum energy-performance standards and building codes, and aggregating demand for sustainable cooling through buyers’ clubs and bulk procurement.
This would help develop sustainable cold chains to reduce food loss and ensure effective vaccine dissemination.
Improving service and maintenance is also essential, as is preventing inefficient air-conditioning units from being dumped in developing countries.
The enormous growth in cooling demand means we must act quickly. Today, an estimated 3.6 billion air conditioners, refrigerators, and related appliances are used worldwide; to meet the world’s cooling needs, that number will more than triple, to 14 billion cooling units, by 2050.
Access to cooling is already becoming a leading climate and social justice issue around the world — especially in the many Asian, African, and South American countries that are subject to increasingly unlivable temperatures and already suffer from poverty, water shortages and other related problems.
For example, only about 7 percent to 9 percent of Indian households have access to air conditioning today, compared with 60 percent in China and 90 percent in the US.
In India alone, demand for air conditioning is expected to grow by more than 1 billion units over the coming decades. During this time, making cooling less polluting will be critical.
Decreasing the cost, as India has done through its innovative bulk procurement program, would also be beneficial.
We should all take courage from the Montreal Protocol’s success in repairing the ozone layer and mitigating more warming from greenhouse gases than any other measure.
All countries must now adopt common-sense initiatives to make cooling more efficient, less emissions-intensive, and more affordable for consumers.
Most urgently, we must heed the latest understanding of the planet’s sensitivity to continuing emissions and recognize that without rapid action, runaway climate change will be far harder to prevent.
Durwood Zaelke is president of the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development and a codirector of the Program on Governance for Sustainable Development at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Mario Molina, a 1995 Nobel laureate in chemistry, is a professor at the University of California, San Diego, and the National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
RSS