The COVID-19 pandemic, which has upended the global economy, might have a silver lining for Taiwan’s manufacturing industry, as it gives corporate executives an opportunity to reflect on their traditional business models in preparation for a sea change in global trade amid narrow profit margins and rising competition from the “red supply chain.”
The US-China trade dispute provides an additional catalyst for Taiwanese firms to seek new growth engines, as Beijing seeks to decouple from the US and Taiwan by fostering its own supply chains.
Innolux Corp and AU Optronics Corp, which used to be among the world’s top three flat-panel suppliers, have been forced to concentrate on specialized products, such as displays for medical equipment, as Chinese rivals led by BOE Technology Group have snatched their market share through rapid capacity expansions.
The two firms’ efforts have paid off, as demand for medical equipment has been on the rise amid new waves of COVID-19 infections worldwide, spurring demand for virus testing and health checks. Specialized flat panels deliver much better margins than the standard products made by their Chinese peers.
AUO and Innolux are also developing miniLED technology, which Innolux considers the next generation in display technology, due to its affordability and scalability.
Meanwhile, Catcher Technology Co, a major metal casing supplier for Apple Inc’s iPhones, on Aug. 18 said it would exit the competitive and saturated phone casing market by selling two of its Chinese factories to Lens Technology Co, a Chinese touch-panel cover glass maker, for US$1.43 billion.
The decision was made with the best interests of its shareholders in mind, amid changes in global trade and customers’ strategies, as well as deteriorating price competition, Catcher said. The firm said it is exploring new business opportunities in 5G and automotive electronics, which have ample room to grow, chairman Allen Hung (洪水樹) told reporters.
Being an Apple supplier, Catcher has been making slim profits amid rising costs, similar to its peers in the supply chain. Last year, Catcher’s net profit slumped nearly 60 percent annually to NT$11.27 billion (US$381.7 million at the current exchange rate).
Apple has been adding more Chinese firms to its supply chains in a bid to boost its pricing power and trim costs. It has been reluctant to help its assembly or component partners access expensive high-end manufacturing equipment.
Combined with the fallout from the pandemic, it would be difficult for independent smartphone casing suppliers, such as Catcher, to absorb the spike in manufacturing costs.
IPhone assemblers Hon Hai Precision Industry Co and Pegatron Corp supply their own handset casings.
The decision by Wistron Corp, another iPhone assembler, to sell its Chinese iPhone assembly lines to China’s Luxshare Precision Industry Co for 3 billion yuan (US$438.37 million) took the market by surprise, raising investor concerns about the increasing threat from the “red supply chain.”
Luxshare is the first iPhone assembler to originate in China and has been nibbling at major assembler Hon Hai’s market share.
At the same time, Wistron is setting up new assembly lines in India to produce new models of the affordable iPhone SE, further moving its production out of China.
The shifts in Apple’s supply chain suggest that the company is increasing its number of Chinese assemblers to maintain a stable iPhone supply while minimizing risks from the US-China trade spat.
Taiwanese manufacturers should seek to generate profits from the changes in the global trade landscape and invest in new areas to prepare for post-pandemic market demand.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS