Before the COVID-19 outbreak, the development of the multilateral WTO system was already experiencing problems.
Following the outbreak, the world has started to reflect on globalization, which has positioned China as the world’s factory. More people are now predicting that this pattern would be replaced by friendly bubbles focused on bolstering bilateral economic and trade relations between countries.
In other words, bilateral free-trade agreements (FTAs) will likely become increasingly important. Taiwan should make the most of this time when relations with the US are better than they have been for a long time to negotiate an FTA with Washington to open up new possibilities for the nation’s economic, trade and international status.
The COVID-19 pandemic has severed supply chains, and the imports and exports of certain goods are being constrained by other countries. This has prompted private businesses and governments to no longer make costs the only consideration when choosing their production base and planning their supply chains; they are now also weighing safety, independence and controllability when mapping them.
To better respond to the impact of sudden public health and geopolitical emergencies on the safety of their supply chains, production processes and links originally subcontracted to businesses in different countries are likely to be simplified, and production lines as far as possible brought back and handled internally by multinational companies. Shortening supply chains not only reduces risk, it also raises businesses’ demands on independence and control.
In the future, when businesses plan their supply chains and production bases, they will likely focus more on good bilateral relations.
If a whole production process cannot be a completed within a single country, businesses have to choose international partners, and they will likely prioritize partners in countries with the same value system or similar industrial and economic conditions.
Competition between countries over the dominance of new technology industrial chains will likely become fiercer, and protection of intellectual property rights of new technologies and standardization of industrial specifications become the focus.
This is also the main reason why the US has repeatedly restricted China’s access to key technologies and products, and also restricted personnel exchanges.
Although Taiwan-US relations are better than they have been for years, international trade is still a matter of give and take. The government must now work for the best interests of the country as a whole and offer fair compensation for industries that are hurt in the process.
The reason Taiwan a few years ago opposed a complete lifting of the ban on US pork and beef imports was that the government had not conducted an assessment of the health risk such imports pose, nor had it formulated a compensation package for domestic industries that would be affected. This is also the reason for the current policy differentiation between US beef and pork.
Following changes in the international situation, the government has reassessed the food safety risk and made appropriate plans for affected industries.
As the broader circumstances have changed, it is time to make a reassessment of what would be the most advantageous options for Taiwan.
Honda Chen is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers