Since the death of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) on July 31, some people have been calling for the government to establish a “Lee Teng-hui library” as a permanent memorial. Some have proposed using the US’ presidential libraries as a model to follow, overlooking Taiwan’s lack of a legal framework for establishing such institutions.
In 2005, Academia Historica, under then-president Chang Yen-hsien (張炎憲), cooperated with Lee’s think tank, Taiwan Advocates, to work out how to raise funds in accordance with the Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects (促進民間參與公共建設法).
The organizations obtained a plot of land in Danhai New Town (淡海新市鎮) in then-Taipei County and established a planning committee for a “Lee Teng-hui presidential library and museum.”
However, a foundation that had promised to provide funding for the project changed its mind, so Academia Historica in 2010 had to formally ask the Ministry of the Interior to cancel the appropriation of the land.
Taiwan Advocates in 2012 changed its name to the Lee Teng-hui Foundation, and announced its intention to promote the establishment of a “Lee Teng-hui presidential library,” and the New Taipei City Government helped promote the build-operate-transfer (BOT) project.
Some commentators misrepresented the project as having more to do with political interests than creating a cultural and educational facility for the pubic good.
As a result, the Lee foundation’s board of directors decided to halt the BOT project, while newspapers quoted Lee as saying: “Democracy does not need to be remembered; it only needs to be kept going forever.”
This sequence of events might appear to have been the result of a lack of funding sources or interference by opinion makers, but a more fundamental problem is that Taiwan does not have a law such as the US’ Presidential Libraries Act and Presidential Records Act, or South Korea’s Act on the Management of Presidential Archives.
The Archives Act (檔案法) defines archives of the Presidential Office as “government agency records,” just like those of other governmental agencies and departments.
Only those that have “permanent preservation value” are defined as “national archives” that must be transferred to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council.
If a Lee Teng-hui presidential library was established under these conditions, it would not hold any presidential archives.
That would be a far cry from the US network of 13 presidential libraries and museums, which can provide a powerful research function.
The president is the core of political power in Taiwan, so how can the archives generated by the exercise of a president’s power be managed as if they were ordinary government agency records?
For example, South Korea has strict regulations concerning presidential records, stipulating that the records of each president must be transferred to the central records management institution, namely the National Archives of Korea, before the end of their term of office.
After the National Archives receives them, it must transfer them for management by the Presidential Archives.
The Presidential Archives may then establish an exhibition hall or library if it is deemed necessary for the efficient utilization and publicity of the presidential records.
Alternatively, the National Archives may establish an individual presidential library if it is deemed necessary for the management of the records of a specific president.
After a US president leaves office, a fund can be set up to build a presidential library.
Once built, the library is handed over to the National Archives and Records Administration to manage.
There are further regulations governing how long presidential records can be kept secret and procedures for destroying them when permissible.
For the time being, should one of Lee’s former residences be preserved, either the Cuishan Villa in the Waishuangxi (外雙溪) area of Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) or the Hone Shee Villa in Taoyuan’s Dasi District (大溪)?
That is how the official residence of former president Yen Chia-kan (嚴家淦) in Taipei’s Zhongzheng District (中正) and that of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) in the Qihai Cultural Park (七海文化園區) in Dazhi (大直) area have been handled.
Although such a memorial would not have any artifacts or archives from Lee’s presidency, his private items, such as pictures, books, artifacts and photographs portraying his life, could still serve to evoke fond memories.
However, in the long term, the government should at least partly amend the Archives Act and the Presidential and Vice Presidential Records and Artifacts Act (總統副總統文物管理條例) to provide a clear legal status for presidential libraries.
Chen Yi-shen is president of Academia Historica.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
Watching news footage of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials shaking hands and exchanging pleasantries with their counterparts across the Taiwan Strait, I could not help but feel a profound sense of temporal displacement. As a member of the generation born after the lifting of martial law and raised under modern civic education, I truly want to ask the KMT: “Do you not see who the true villain is?” In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party used a bloody civil war to drive the KMT into exile in Taiwan. In the decades that followed, it has sought to completely erase the existence
President William Lai (賴清德) on Sunday congratulated Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and her Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) on their historic landslide victory in Japan’s general election. The LDP secured the largest single-party majority in post-World War II Japan, winning 316 seats. The win is expected to strengthen ties with Japan’s allies and potentially deter Chinese aggression in the region. American Institute in Taiwan Director Raymond Greene on Monday said that under Takaichi’s leadership, he anticipates deeper coordination among the US, Japan and Taiwan to promote regional stability and prosperity. US President Donald Trump has also shown his strong support for Takaichi,
RSS