The world’s biggest cosmetics companies have been selling a fairy tale that often goes something like this: If your husband’s lost interest in you, if your colleagues dismiss you at work, if your talents are ignored, whiten your skin to turn your love life around, boost your career and command center stage.
No company has had greater success peddling this message across Asia, Africa and the Middle East than Unilever’s Fair & Lovely brand, which sells millions of tubes of skin-lightening cream annually for as little as US$2 in India.
The 45-year-old brand earns Anglo-Dutch conglomerate Unilever more than US$500 million in annual revenue in India alone, according to Jefferies financial analysts.
Illustration: Mountain People
Following decades of pervasive advertising promoting the power of lighter skin, a rebranding is hitting the shelves globally, but it is unlikely that fresh marketing by the world’s biggest brands in beauty will reverse deeply rooted prejudices around “colorism,” the idea that fair skin is better than dark skin.
Unilever said that it is removing words like “fair,” “white” and “light” from its marketing and packaging, explaining the decision as a move toward “a more inclusive vision of beauty.”
Unilever’s Indian subsidiary, Hindustan Unilever Ltd, said the Fair & Lovely brand would instead be known as Glow & Lovely.
French cosmetics giant L’Oreal followed suit, saying it too would remove similar wording from its products. Johnson & Johnson said it would stop selling Neutrogena’s fairness and skin-whitening lines altogether.
The makeover is happening in the wake of mass protests against racial injustice following the death of George Floyd, a black man pinned to the ground by a white police officer in the US.
It is the latest in a series of changes as companies rethink their policies amid Black Lives Matter protests, which have spread around the world and reignited conversations about race.
Activists around the world have long sought to counter Unilever’s aggressive marketing of Fair & Lovely, with the brand’s advertisements criticized by women’s groups from Egypt to Malaysia.
Kavitha Emmanuel founded the “Dark is Beautiful” campaign in India more than a decade ago to counter perceptions that lighter skin is more beautiful than naturally darker skin.
She said multinational companies such as Unilever did not initiate skin tone bias, but have capitalized on it.
“Endorsing such a belief for 45 years is definitely quite damaging,” Emmanuel said, adding that it has eroded the self-worth of many young women across India.
For women raised on these fixed standards of beauty, the market is awash with products and services that can both brighten pigmentation from skin damage and outright lighten skin.
At the Skin and Body International beauty clinic in South Africa, owner Tabby Kara said that she sees a lot of people inquiring about going one or two shades lighter.
“It’s a general demand in Africa,” Kara said. “People do want to be a bit fairer simply because society expects or is more interested in the fairness of a person.”
Historically, throughout North Africa and Asia, darker skin has been associated with poor laborers who work in the sun — unlike in Western cultures, where tanned skin is often a sign of time for leisure and beauty.
India’s cultural fixation with lighter skin is embedded in daily matrimonial ads, which frequently note the skin tone of brides and grooms as “fair” or “wheatish” alongside their height, age and education.
The ancient Hindu caste system has helped uphold some of the bias, with darker-skinned people often seen as “untouchables” and relegated to the dirtiest jobs, such as cleaning sewage.
The power of whiter, fairer skin in many nations was further reinforced by European rule, and later by Hollywood and Bollywood movie stars who have featured in skin-lightening ads.
In Japan, pale translucent skin has been coveted since at least the 11th century. So-called bihaku products, based on the Japanese characters for “beauty” and “white,” remain popular today among major brands.
The high-end Tokyo-based skin care brand Shiseido says none of its bihaku products contain ingredients that bleach the skin, but they do reduce melanin that can lead to blemishes.
The company says it has no plans to change its product names, including the White Lucent line, simply because other global companies have done so.
In South Korea, the words “whitening” or mibaek have been used in about 1,200 kinds of cosmetics products since 2001, the South Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety said.
About US$283 million of mibaek products were manufactured last year in South Korea, the ministry said.
South Korean beauty company Amore Pacific said that it uses the word “brightening” for exports to the US to respect cultural diversity, but domestically it cannot replace words such as mibaek on creams sold in South Korea because of laws requiring the use of specific terms to describe the function of skin-lightening products.
US-based Proctor & Gamble, which sells Olay brands Natural White and White Radiance, declined to comment when asked whether it had plans to rebrand globally.
Emmanuel said that she welcomes the decisions by Unilever and L’Oreal, but wants to know whether they would evolve their entire narrative around skin lightening.
“We’re really excited it’s happening, but we’re yet to see what is really going to change,” she said.
Unilever said in its announcement that it recognizes “the use of the words ‘fair’, ‘white’ and ‘light’ suggest a singular ideal of beauty that we don’t think is right.”
Instead, the statement referred to products that deliver “glow, even tone, skin clarity and radiance.”
Alex Malouf, a Dubai, United Arab Emirates-based marketing executive who was formerly at Proctor & Gamble, said that companies had been playing to different audiences around the world, but are now paying attention to the societal changes happening in the US and Europe, where shareholders are primarily based.
L’Oreal, for example, last month wrote on Twitter that it “stands in solidarity with the Black community and against injustice of any kind.”
Its products in the US include the Dark & Lovely brand, aimed at black women.
However, outside the US the company was marketing its White Perfect line for a “fair, flawless complexion.”
“But you can’t do that in the digital age because I can see what you guys are doing in the US,” Malouf said. “I can see what you do over here.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing