In the past week, Taiwanese have been posting selfies on Facebook with one hand covering their mouth. Their nails are painted. The initiator, Facebook group “Not speaking out does not mean it did not happen” (不發聲不代表沒發生), is gaining traction, with a Central News Agency report calling it the Taiwanese version of the MeToo movement.
The movement was prompted by reports about a New Taipei City Health Department worker surnamed Lin (林), who reportedly jumped from a building this month, leaving a lengthy note that accused her former employer at a care facility of sexual abuse.
The director, surnamed Liao (廖), and his wife have denied the allegations and the incident is still being investigated.
The details are murky and unfortunately only Liao and his wife remain alive to insist on their side of the story — that Liao was involved in an extramarital affair with Lin, who was not coerced into doing anything against her will. They have criticized Lin’s personal life and say they are the victims of a “lying homewrecker.”
This is reminiscent of the 2017 suicide of Lin Yi-han (林奕含), who in a fictional story described a cram school teacher who sexually assaults his students. Her real-life cram school teacher denied that the character in the story was based on him, although he said he had an extramarital affair with her.
Like Liao, the teacher and his family lamented to the media that “groundless allegations” had ruined their lives, despite no charges ever being filed.
Media attention and shame that accusers endure while cases are being investigated is often what stops people from reporting such incidents. That Lin from the health department took her life as she revealed the allegations speaks to this societal pressure.
“Pride is like a needle that sewed her mouth shut,” she wrote in the note.
A Liberty Times op-ed by legal commentary Web site Follaw stated: “Taiwanese society often heavily criticizes women who are sexually assaulted, which may be one reason why the victims are afraid of seeking help. Every time a woman is sexually assaulted, someone will say: ‘Women should know how to protect themselves. How can they let this happen to themselves?’ and so on.”
Perpetrators are often in a position of power, which makes it even harder to speak out, or even resist abuse.
Psychologist Ashley Chen (陳雪如) addressed this on Facebook, writing: “Your refusals are ignored, your boundaries are invaded, but everyone around you says that it is your fault, that you seduced your boss. You are in a very vulnerable position and in an environment that is controlled by the very person who is assaulting you.”
When the victim is too afraid to resist strongly, in a world where many still believe that “no means yes,” the perpetrator might actually believe that they are doing nothing wrong, Chen wrote. Even worse, the victims are often branded as homewreckers who willingly went along with the abuse and even formed a relationship with the perpetrator.
It is often shame, fear and self-doubt that leads the women to develop Stockholm syndrome to justify what they are enduring, she wrote. That is why these cases are often this murky, and public criticism does not help.
Hopefully, the “speaking out” movement is not just an immediate response to the suicides, but a serious call for people to pay attention to the problem, and for women to have the courage and support to stand out. It has been two years since the MeToo movement began and although it did have some effect in Taiwan, awareness still does not seem great enough.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS