US President Donald Trump spent the first three years of his tenure balancing the demands of hardliners who wanted a crackdown on China against his own desire to pursue a trade deal and cultivate a stronger relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
The unexpected order on Wednesday last week to close the Chinese consulate in Houston made one thing clear: The hawks are now in charge.
Eager to blame China for the COVID-19 pandemic, and fed up with what US officials call a history of espionage and intellectual-property theft, Trump has allowed a small group of advisers led by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to push the nation’s China policies toward its most antagonistic in decades. The result is a series of sanctions, restrictions and condemnations that culminated in the Houston decision.
Illustration: Yusha
“Despite the overall message that the administration was tough on China, we saw very much the opposite until we had a pandemic to contend with,” said Mira Rapp-Hooper, a senior fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations, a US-based think tank.
“They actually pursued a very narrow China policy up until spring,” Rapp-Hooper added.
The battle has now been opened on a range of fronts: China’s tightening grip over Hong Kong, its treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, its infiltration of technology and the theft of intellectual property. In nearly every policy realm, the US is pushing back harder. It is banning Chinese academics and expelling Chinese journalists, and warning that the US needs to cut its dependence on Chinese products.
Pompeo’s team, along with US Deputy National Security Adviser Matt Pottinger, are the key architects of the change. They are finding a more willing audience in the White House for their argument that the US needs to strike back after what they see as decades spent ignoring China’s behavior, criticizing both Republican and Democratic administrations for being naive.
According to one person familiar with internal discussions, Pompeo and his advisers have come to conclude that a capitalist, democratic US and a Communist, unelected leadership in China are fundamentally at odds and cannot coexist.
“America is engaging in a response to Chinese Communist Party and aggression in a way that America has not done for the past 20 years. We responded to their military, use of military force, by moving back. We responded to their use of diplomatic coercion via retreating. Donald Trump is not going to permit that, and we made that clear,” Pompeo said in June.
With the Oval Office offering little restraint, Pompeo’s team has orchestrated an unprecedented roll-out of attacks on Beijing, calling on every senior official in the executive branch to join the fray. That has included speeches by US National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien, FBI Director Christopher Wray and US Attorney General Bill Barr, who lambasted Hollywood and companies such as Apple for succumbing to China’s will. Pompeo has even given more latitude to his spokeswoman, Morgan Ortagus, to call out China in unusually harsh terms, as she did last year in referring to the country’s “thuggish regime.”
The Chinese embassy in Washington urged the US on Wednesday last week to show restraint, comparing the administration to a car going the wrong way down the road.
“It’s time to step on the brakes and return to the right direction!” the embassy tweeted.
Pompeo has taken the campaign on the road, with trips to the UK and Denmark last week aimed at coalescing a global coalition to oppose China. On Thursday, he visited the presidential library of former US president Richard Nixon — who was responsible for the re-opening with China in 1972 — for a speech that cast the US-China fight as the ultimate clash of civilizations.
Fueling the new hawkishness is a group of advisers around Pompeo who have laid out a China approach in far more aggressive and confrontational terms. They include US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs David Stilwell and two China-born US scholars pulled from the world of academia: Miles Yu (余茂春) and Mung Chiang (蔣濛).
Yu is a history professor who has focused on China’s military at the US Naval Academy and has long flagged concerns about Beijing’s efforts to expand its capabilities and influence. Chiang is on leave from his post as the dean of the college of engineering at Purdue University.
Both bring skepticism about previous efforts to engage China in order to get it to embrace Western values. They are joined by a key outside adviser, Hudson Institute Center on Chinese Strategy director Michael Pillsbury, who wrote a 2015 book titled The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower.
The group is not winning all its arguments: A proposal to undermine Hong Kong’s dollar peg got little traction, and a recommendation that the US pursue a free-trade agreement with Taiwan — a move which would infuriate Beijing — has gone nowhere. Trump also has not given his sign-off to another idea to bar entry to the US to members of the Chinese Communist Party.
Yet the days of Trump heaping praise on Xi, even as COVID-19 began to spread, are gone, replaced by an atmosphere of unrelenting negativity. According to numerous people familiar with the conversations, even moderate voices are ignored in administration meetings. US Vice President Mike Pence vetoed the idea of serving as a back channel to China, wary of getting in the middle of an unstable and bifurcated policy, according to a person familiar with the proposal.
The newly hawkish tone, while shared in the US Congress, has sparked concern from Democrats and Republicans outside the government who argue that it was largely a fiction given the revelations of former White House national security adviser John Bolton’s book, The Room Where it Happened. Bolton, who left the White House last year, argues that Trump only saw China through the lens of his own electoral chances, never cared about human rights in China and did not mind if Xi locked up Muslims in Xinjiang.
“This is partly electioneering. Clearly China creates a lot of problems for the United States, but this is the wrong way to handle it. If Pompeo thinks he is going to quote change Chinese behavior, he is gravely mistaken. Statements like his and others very much weaken the hands of reformers in China and very much strengthen the hands of hardline hawks in China,” said US Senator Max Baucus, who served as US ambassador to Beijing under former US president Barack Obama’s administration.
Several former diplomats as well as more centrist Republicans and Democrats argue that the US needs to cooperate with China to get things done on all sorts of matters, including counter-terrorism, climate change and nuclear non-proliferation. They also worry the new tougher strategy would cause Chinese officials to dig in their heels even further.
“The worry that I have is that only Xi Jinping could bring the Republicans and Democrats together in the American Congress. My worry is we’re going to move too far toward hostility,” former US secretary of defense Robert Gates told the Council on Foreign Relations last week.
Many in Beijing see the tougher US moves as a last-ditch, and hopeless, attempt to halt the progress of a country that has been catching up to the US, in terms of overall economic might.
“If anyone in Washington believes that applying more pressure to China will force China to succumb, they are indulging in fantasy,” said Gao Zhikai (高志凱), a former Chinese diplomat and translator for former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平).
“Washington needs to come to terms with a China which will eventually outgrow the size of the United States in about 10 to 15 years,” Gao added.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95