Smaller Taiwanese semiconductor companies are likely to benefit from China’s tussle with the US over trade and technological prowess, with handset chip designer MediaTek having a good chance of getting more orders from Huawei Technologies Co after Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) said it would halt chip supplies to the Chinese tech giant within two months.
TSMC, the world’s biggest foundry, told investors on Thursday that as of May 15 it had stopped taking new orders from Huawei for the Kirin-brand chips designed by Huawei’s HiSilicon Technologies Co, after the US Department of Commerce banned exports that contain US technology to Huawei.
TSMC said it would not ship any chips to Huawei after the 120-day grace period granted by the US ends on Sept. 14.
Huawei has placed orders totaling US$2.1 billion with TSMC as it races to secure as many advanced Kirin chips as possible before the deadline.
Analysts said the move might help Huawei build sufficient chip inventory for its smartphone shipments until the end of this year, or early next year, but it would face a shortage of high-end chips next year if it fails to find alternative chip suppliers, or chip designers to replace HiSilicon.
Huawei is under intense pressure to find new suppliers for its mobile phone chips, especially 5G chips, to prevent disruption to its new premium model production lines.
Without new and high-end 5G phones to add to its portfolio, Huawei could risk losing market share and its No. 2 position in the world’s smartphone market.
Qualcomm is out of the picture, as it is based in San Diego, California. Samsung Electronics Co could be an option, but the South Korean firm has reportedly declined Huawei’s request for its 5G chips, codenamed Exynos, or to provide foundry services to make Kirin chips, given the intensifying battle for 5G dominance.
China’s biggest chip company, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC), is a long shot, given its weaker technological capabilities.
The most advanced node that SMIC can offer is 14-nanometer technology, far less advanced than the 5-nanometer technology TSMC uses to make 5G chips for Huawei.
Besides, SMIC also uses a lot of semiconductor equipment from the US to produce its chips. Placing orders with SMIC could spell trouble if the US refuses to approve it shipping chips to Huawei.
US regulations require Washington’s approval to sell goods to Huawei produced with US-made equipment or using intellectual property owned by US firms.
However, MediaTek, the world’s second-biggest mobile phone chip supplier, now has a good chance to become a major supplier to Huawei, after being its secondary source for years.
Huawei usually uses MediaTek’s chips for its entry-level phones, but it could accelerate its purchases of 4G and 5G chips, making the Hsinchu-based firm the biggest beneficiary of the US-China trade spat.
MediaTek should be able to see shipments of 4G and 5G chips to Huawei soar after Sept. 14, as standard products are allowed to be shipped to Huawei under US regulations.
Realtek Semiconductor Corp and power management chipmaker Silergy Corp are also likely to see order gains, especially if China puts Qualcomm and Broadcom on its “unreliable entity” list, which means they could face investigation and be barred from selling to Chinese firms, in retaliation for Washington’s moves against Huawei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath