Many Hong Kong residents are scouring for new jobs and homes overseas, fearful that new national security legislation imposed by Beijing would crush coveted rights not enjoyed on the mainland and herald a new authoritarian era for China’s freest territory.
Beijing last week bypassed the territory’s Legislative Council to approve the legislation directly, heightening anxiety over its impact on the former British colony of 7.5 million people that is a global financial hub, and gateway for capital flows in and out of China.
Immigration lawyers and consultants, property agents and recruitment groups from Australia to Canada have told reporters that they were inundated with enquiries from Hong Kong residents.
“Hong Kong demand for international real estate and residency programs has rocketed over the past few weeks,” Georg Chmiel, executive chairman of international property portal Juwai IQI, said in a statement. “We see it in Malaysia, Australia, the UK, Thailand, Canada, Vietnam and the Philippines.”
Juwai does not disclose numbers of inquiries, but did say Australia was the top foreign real-estate investment location for Hong Kong buyers in the first half of this year.
MIDDLE-CLASS EXODUS
While leaving Hong Kong has traditionally been an alternative for the wealthy and foreign passport-holders, more middle and working-class people are now also seeking options, especially where visas come cheaper.
Lily Chong, a real-estate agent in Western Australia who markets developments to investors in Asia, said inquiries from Hong Kong shot up more than 40 percent since the middle of last month and more than 140 potential buyers took part in an online forum on the last weekend of the month.
“After just a few days we have already closed one sale sight-unseen,” added Chong, managing director of IQI Western Australia.
After weathering often violent, mass anti-Beijing protests since last year, China says the new legislation is aimed at a small minority of troublemakers and would not erode the legal rights making Hong Kong such a popular financial center.
QUASHING DISSENT
However, critics believe it is aimed at quashing dissent and would inevitably erode freedoms under the “one country, two systems” formula agreed when Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule in 1997, an event that also sparked an exodus.
The legislation punishes crimes of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces with up to life in prison, and within hours of its implementation, 10 people were arrested on Wednesday last week during disturbances.
After a first rush of inquiries about overseas possibilities when China proposed the legislation on May 21, the volume has surged again as its implementation happened.
As well as Australia and Britain, residents are seeking a new life in cheaper countries such as Vietnam and the Philippines. Singapore is generating high interest, too.
TO SINGAPORE AND TAIWAN
Andrew McNeilis, managing director for Asia at recruitment firm Phaidon International, said his firm had seen strong demand from Hong Kongers for Singapore, while it was becoming harder to convince people to go the territory.
“The new security law may result in an exodus of local talent,” said Victor Filamor, a partner at executive search firm Stones International in Hong Kong, though he stressed that it was too early to know the legislation’s effects.
Fueling the scramble, Taiwan, Britain, Australia and the US have all proposed measures to help accommodate Hong Kongers looking to resettle.
The day the legislation came into force, Taiwan opened an office to help Hong Kongers who might wish to go there.
Those looking to relocate to Canada are finding that Ottawa’s strict COVID-19 controls are making it particularly hard to get in, immigration lawyers said.
However, refugee claims from Hong Kong in the first three months of this year did nearly triple to 25 compared with all of last year, Canadian government data showed.
Stung by the offers of help for Hong Kong’s residents, China has warned foreign governments against meddling.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past