In late May, a week after Chinese officials announced a plan to impose sweeping national security legislation in Hong Kong, British newspaper the Guardian issued a callout to people who believed they would be affected. It wanted to hear how people felt about the legislation, how it might change their lives and how they felt about the last year of protests.
The response was overwhelming. Within days, the newspaper had received more than 30,000 messages from people inside and outside Hong Kong — more than any Guardian community callout before.
After the legislation came into force last week, the contributions continued to pour in. People have expressed fury, frustration and a sense of hopelessness. They oppose the legislation, but have no recourse to stop it. Many asked the international community for help. Others mourned the end of the Hong Kong they loved and lashed out at the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Some said they welcomed the legislation, hoping for an end to the protests that at times turned violent.
Illustration: Mountain People
Here are a few of the messages the Guardian received:
“Feeling heartbroken seeing the latest developments. It is like waking up in the morning and being told that my home no longer exists. Freedom of speech, rule of law and social justice are the values that Hong Kong represents. If Hong Kong loses these values, Hong Kong will no longer be Hong Kong, and I will no longer be myself,” said Sandra, a London-based curator who is originally from Hong Kong.
“I am frustrated, furious and feel powerless. I have seen this place — with values of justice, openness, diversity, rule of law, freedom of expression — turned into a police state. Many people are disappointed and considering leaving. What worries me most is our young people. Most of them do not have the ability to emigrate. They are too brave. They should not be the ones to sacrifice for this unjust situation,” Hong Kong resident Louis, 55, said.
“I am extremely worried about the future of my homeland. I don’t want Hong Kong to gradually become another Xinjiang. I am scared that writing this could be considered collusion with foreign countries, and I might be arrested. If the example of Hong Kong teaches the world anything, it is the necessity of vigilance in preserving the institutions of liberty and democracy with concrete actions. Don’t wait until it is too late,” Hong Kong resident Leung, 22, said.
“I feel terrified that this law will turn Hong Kong into China. In China, any sort of protest can be regarded as ‘endangering national security’. On the one hand, we feel lost. The old Hong Kong is dead. On the other hand, we feel glad that we finally forced the CCP to unveil its true evil side,” said Fung, 25, a primary-school teacher in Hong Kong.
“I feel pretty helpless and hopeless. The protesters are afraid they will be caught by the police, or get caught and sent to China. We don’t know what will happen if we are sent to China,” Hong Kong resident Leanne, 13, said.
“One country, two systems has totally vanished. Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) is not listening to the demands of the local population, but listening to instructions from Beijing. The situation is destroying the freedom, law and order of Hong Kong. The protests a year ago were disciplined and peaceful, but the government is not listening. So people became violent to express their concerns. Riots are the sound of the unheard,” Hong Kong resident Wong said.
“The national security law for Hong Kong sets a very bad precedent: the mainland Chinese legislature legislating for Hong Kong. The autonomy of Hong Kong will be eroded and freedom of expression will be restricted. People can no longer express views that are not in line with the Chinese government,” an anonymous retiree from Hong Kong said.
“We are facing the end of our treasured, free and open society. As an elderly person, my only contribution to this movement is to give support as much as possible — attending peaceful rallies and marches, whether legal or not,” Hong Kong resident Samson Cheng, 68, said.
“So much has died in the last 23 years. Bit by bit, the mainland government has infiltrated Hong Kong, wanting to control it. Watching from afar, it is even more heartbreaking. My nephews will now be brainwashed. They may not even have the right to keep quiet. They will be forced to say things they may not believe in,” said Linda Chan, 63, a retired Hong Konger who lives in London.
“One thing that worries me is my own future after I finish my studies in the UK. Should I return to Hong Kong? Will I come under their secret surveillance? Will I face retaliation or arrest just because of my political stance? I will have to come to terms with the possibility of never returning to my homeland and being separated from my family for the rest of my life,” said an anonymous doctorate student in the UK who is from Hong Kong and holds a British National Overseas passport.
“It’s completely nonsense to argue that Hong Kong people have no freedom. What place on earth would allow riots and violent protests to carry on for more than six months? The series of outrageous violent protests are unequivocal evidence of the almost unlimited freedom of speech enjoyed by Hong Kong people. My freedom has never been diminished by the laws and regulations in Hong Kong. The only time that I felt threatened was during the violent protests,” Hong Kong-based lawyer D, 38, said.
“I welcome the proposed implementation of the national security law. I truly believe that is the only and effective way to end the mess that we have suffered and been facing since last June,” Hong Kong-based translator Catherine, 56, said.
“Many of us support the protests and feel angry about what the CCP, the Hong Kong government and the police have done. But we are also pressured by our bosses whose businesses rely on the mainland. We are helpless and frustrated. Some of us are trying to escape to foreign countries, but some have got no choice. We do need help from the world. Please!” Hong Kong-based surveyor Chan, 27, said.
“Although there is nothing we can do, I will continue to speak the truth. Even though I am scared to death of the law. I can still tweet, sign petitions, donate money. At least I know how to ‘be water.’ We are grateful for the sacrifice of the young people and we should not give in. We hope the free world will help us. We will do whatever we can to fight for our freedom. Please continue to stand with Hong Kong,” said Cecilia, 53, a mother of two who lives in Hong Kong.
“I wish the UK government could take action to protect Hong Kong and Hong Kongers. It is indeed the UK’s responsibility. Why do we have to suffer from their wrong decision? We have shown our passion, our dignity. We built Hong Kong. We contributed our time, our life to the city. Didn’t we do enough? Didn’t our peace move you? Please help us. Help Hong Kong!” Hong Kong-based fashion designer Mo, 41, said.
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
“You are Taiwanese? Do you speak Taiwanese then?” Growing up in Buenos Aires, my school memories were filled with Spanish, a language that dances off the tongue with the same rhythm and elegance as the tango. However, in my house, a different melody would play — one that alluded to my roots, an artisanal, homemade combination of Taiwanese Hokkien and Mandarin. Although it was a beautiful sound, it was not a tempo I could follow. Put simply, the Taiwanese language was too hard for me to grasp. Eventually, my parents gave into my requests and abandoned that unique fusion of Chinese and
On April 24, US President Joe Biden signed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. The law, which was overwhelmingly approved by the US Congress, requires the popular video-sharing app TikTok to divest from its parent company, China-based ByteDance, or face a ban in the US. The legislation highlights a dilemma faced by democratic countries, including Taiwan, that pits free speech against national security interests. The US ultimatum is meant to address national security concerns that, according to China’s National Security Law and National Intelligence Law, obligates Chinese individuals and organizations to support national intelligence work, allowing the