Saving money can be a good habit, as it helps people and companies safeguard their livelihoods during a crisis.
However, building an excessively large savings pool could spell trouble for a nation’s economy. A spike in gross savings — gross national income minus expenditures or investments — indicates a lack of domestic investment and consumption, which could ultimately lead to economic stagnation.
Taiwan is facing just such a risk, as its gross domestic savings are forecast to climb to about NT$2.4 trillion (US$81.22 billion) this year, pushing the excess savings rate to 12.35 percent, the Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) has said.
That means NT$12.35 in every NT$100 of savings would be idle.
Taiwanese have long considered thrift a great virtue, and as a result the nation’s excess savings rate is set to surpass 10 percent for the eighth consecutive year, according to DGBAS data.
Last year, the nation’s gross savings shrank to NT$2.24 trillion from NT$2.48 trillion a year earlier, with the excess savings rate improving to 11.59 percent from 13.23 percent, the data showed.
The agency attributed the increase in this year’s savings to the COVID-19 pandemic, as households and companies have been reluctant to spend money on unnecessary items, new technologies or assets.
As a result, the nation’s savings rate is expected to rise from 34.35 percent last year to 35.79 percent, which would be the highest in three decades, the DGBAS said.
As the pandemic hinders trade and weighs on economic growth, the government is pulling out all the stops to stimulate consumption and investment — it is issuing Triple Stimulus Vouchers to boost individual consumption and magnifying the incentive investment programs initiated by the Ministry of Economic Affairs to attract businesses.
The investment programs, launched last year amid a US-China trade spat, aim to spur investment by Taiwanese firms through lower interest rates, longer loan terms, relaxed labor restrictions, and easy access to land and utilities.
These have attracted more than 500 local manufacturers, including LCD panel maker Innolux and passive component maker Yageo, which have pledged to invest NT$1 trillion on capacity relocation to Taiwan, or automating existing production lines. The figure might look significant, but most of the investments are to be spread over about three years.
The DGBAS expects the increase in private investment to boost economic growth to 1.67 percent this year and help the nation avoid an economic contraction, unlike most other countries, including the US, whose economies are set to shrink due to the pandemic.
However, the pace of investment is not enough to solve the issues of excessive savings and insufficient investment in Taiwan.
The government needs to come up with broader plans and long-term efforts to speed up domestic investment, for example by mapping new projects to spur investment on technologies with high growth potential, such as 5G and artificial intelligence.
It should also create a more business-friendly investment environment to attract multinational companies, rather than relying solely on local firms.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US