China is attempting to use journalists from non-English speaking countries to promote its policies beyond its borders in a concerted push for influence.
An International Federation of Journalists survey of journalist unions across 58 countries found that through study tours, control of media infrastructure and the provision of pro-Beijing content, China is “running an extensive and sophisticated long-term outreach campaign [in] a strategic, long-term effort to reshape the global news landscape with a China-friendly global narrative.”
The report, “The China Story: reshaping the world’s media,” argues that Beijing is also seeking to build control over messaging infrastructure — effectively the channels by which countries receive news — through foreign media acquisitions and large-scale telecommunications ventures.
The report found that the decade-long campaign “seems to be escalating.”
The survey, carried out in September and October last year, asked journalism unions from 58 countries on whether they have received overtures from Beijing. This included questions about sponsored trips, content-sharing agreements and approaches to sign bilateral agreements with Chinese bodies.
Journalists from 29 of the surveyed nations had been on trips to China, with almost two-thirds of respondents saying that China has a visible presence in their national media. One-third of the journalism unions had been approached by Chinese entities seeking joint agreements.
The research found that Beijing increasingly relies on foreign journalists, especially from developing countries, to amplify its own talking points.
“Beijing’s strategy whereby state-approved propaganda is diffused into existing systems is known as ‘borrowing a boat to reach the ocean,’” the report said.
One example is Beijing’s attempt to push back against western narratives of human rights abuses in the political indoctrination camps in China’s far western Xinjiang, where Beijing is holding up to 1 million members of the Uighur minority, according to UN estimates.
Beijing has taken several groups of journalists from Muslim countries to the camps to win international support for its hardline strategy of combating what it says is religious extremism.
China is not the only country that seeks to influence foreign journalists. Many others, including the US and Israel, run government-sponsored journalistic study tours of their countries, seeking to promote their positions and global points of view.
Global arms of state-funded media organizations or national broadcasters — such as Voice of America or the BBC World Service — are seen as effective instruments of “soft power” and influence.
Report author Louisa Lim (林慕蓮) told the Guardian that China’s efforts were often more comprehensive and were specifically targeted to each country, in particular, toward small and developing nations.
“It’s true other countries have done this every effectively. One difference, I would say, is the way journalists who go on these tours are being used domestically by, for instance, going on tours of Xinjiang, that is used try and show international support for China’s policies,” Lim said.
“Also journalists are sometimes asked to sign agreements before they leave and told not to write critical stories. There is also an element of monitoring, with officials, translators always present,” she added.
At a roundtable of nine Burmese journalists conducted for their research, every single journalist had been offered sponsored trips to China at least twice and had accepted every single offer. One journalist had been to China nine times.
“The message is not ‘don’t go on these tours,’ but ‘know what they are.’ If you have an opportunity to meet senior officials, use them to hold to account,” Lim said.
The Guardian has sought comment from the Chinese embassy in Australia, sending a detailed list of questions. It has not received a response.
Media control and influence has become a critical diplomatic controversy between, in particular, the US and China.
Last week, the US Department of State announced that Chinese state-run media organizations China Central Television, China News Service, the People’s Daily and the Global Times would be designated in the US as foreign missions.
In response, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian (趙立堅) said the US decision was “proof of blatant political oppression by the US on Chinese media.”
“We strongly urge the US to reject the Cold War mindset and ideological bias, and to immediately stop and redress such wrongdoing that hurts others and itself,“ Zhao said.
China has also been refusing to renew the visas of US journalists working in the country.
The research found Beijing has prioritized journalists from countries involved in its massive infrastructural project, the Belt and Road Initiative.
A number of Filipino journalists received training in China after the Filipino Presidential Communications Operation Office signed a memorandum of understanding with China’s National Radio and Television Administration.
One of the journalists — who asked to remain anonymous — noted the subsequent impact on their news output.
“The way they write their stories now, they reflect the way Xinhua — or the state media in China — is writing their stories. It’s normally propaganda,” the journalist said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US