In the past, politicians and businesspeople seemed to have a special distaste for urban green spaces and trees. Nowadays, even the blue skies behind and above buildings are at risk.
Some examples are Farglory Group’s office building behind the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall in Taipei and the 29-story combined hotel and residential building behind the Lanyang Museum (蘭陽美術館) in Yilan County.
Both buildings block the sunlight and disturb the view to where the horizon gracefully meets the sky.
In the past, no one thought of such things as a problem, but our standards are now higher and we care about scenery and sunlight.
For example, Japan has had legislation to safeguard people’s right to sunlight for more than four decades, but Taiwan did not pass such legislation until last year. The US, the UK and Germany, as well as several Southeast Asian countries, have landscaping laws, which also safeguard access to sunlight.
Despite efforts to create similar legislation in Taiwan for more than a decade, the nation has failed to catch up to other countries due to pressure from interest groups. It has also failed to implement legislation to regulate landscape architecture licenses: Bills have passed a second legislative reading on few occasions, without ever making it to a third.
As a result, there is a never-ending series of landscaping disputes. Residents in Zhishanyan (芝山岩) in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) this year filed a lawsuit against the construction of two 14-story buildings in the area. The buildings are to look like a giant pair of chopsticks raising from the ground and poking holes in the Taipei sky.
Local organizations have also protested in front of Taipei City Hall, saying that after receiving the construction license in 2012, the developer changed the design.
Protesters say the Taipei Department of Urban Development (DUD) failed to submit these changes to the Urban Development Review Committee, as required by regulations, and instead twice approved the changes without involving the public or agencies such as the Taipei Department of Cultural Affairs.
According to the protesters, the size of the site was increased by 193m2 compared with the original construction license, raising floor space by 2,000m2.
As Zhishanyan is an area with a rich ecology and cultural heritage, a set of specific rules for development there have been in place since 2013.
The rules state that an urban development review that allows for resident participation is required for any large construction projects with a far-reaching impact, or such that might cause major harm to public security, health or the preservation and maintenance of historical buildings.
The DUD ignores these rules, saying that the development is sanctioned under older legislation. However, many residents think that approving design changes without review after licensing shows that the DUD is conniving with the developer.
The view on beautiful landscape that should belong to all of us is now to belong exclusively to residents in a luxury compound.
The right to access to views of landscape and sunlight involves a host of interests, but when the public wants its share, it faces a monster.
Our elected representatives must work harder and pay more attention to public opinion instead of acting recklessly.
Lu Ching-fu is a professor at Fu Jen Catholic University’s applied arts department.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS