MRT should start earlier
A few days ago, I made plans to hike up Qixingshan (七星山) from Lengshuikeng (冷水坑) on Yangmingshan (陽明山) in Taipei.
After descending Qixingshan to Xiao Youkeng (小油坑), we were going to run to Qingtiangang (擎天崗).
However, due to the heat, we all thought that the earlier we could get out, the better, and the best solution was to take the day’s first No. 5 bus that stops at the Taipei’s MRT metropolitan railway system’s Jiantan Station at 5:40am.
We thought that the smoothest way to achieve this would be to take the MRT from New Taipei City’s Banciao District (板橋), but then we found out that the first train of the day only leaves the starting station at 6am, so in the end, we had to take a taxi to Jiantan Station to be able to catch the first No. 5 bus.
During summer, the sun rises just after 5am, so at that time there are lots of people who want to take public transport to start their activities, whether it be tourism or exercising.
Since most buses lines start operating just after 5am, why cannot the same apply to the Taipei MRT?
To allow the thousands of early risers in Taipei and New Taipei City to enjoy the convenience of public transport, the Taipei and New Taipei City MRT system should be coordinated with bus operations, perhaps with fewer departures before 6am considering the lower number of passengers traveling at that time.
Chen Ho-wen
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS