MRT should start earlier
A few days ago, I made plans to hike up Qixingshan (七星山) from Lengshuikeng (冷水坑) on Yangmingshan (陽明山) in Taipei.
After descending Qixingshan to Xiao Youkeng (小油坑), we were going to run to Qingtiangang (擎天崗).
However, due to the heat, we all thought that the earlier we could get out, the better, and the best solution was to take the day’s first No. 5 bus that stops at the Taipei’s MRT metropolitan railway system’s Jiantan Station at 5:40am.
We thought that the smoothest way to achieve this would be to take the MRT from New Taipei City’s Banciao District (板橋), but then we found out that the first train of the day only leaves the starting station at 6am, so in the end, we had to take a taxi to Jiantan Station to be able to catch the first No. 5 bus.
During summer, the sun rises just after 5am, so at that time there are lots of people who want to take public transport to start their activities, whether it be tourism or exercising.
Since most buses lines start operating just after 5am, why cannot the same apply to the Taipei MRT?
To allow the thousands of early risers in Taipei and New Taipei City to enjoy the convenience of public transport, the Taipei and New Taipei City MRT system should be coordinated with bus operations, perhaps with fewer departures before 6am considering the lower number of passengers traveling at that time.
Chen Ho-wen
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS