Many observers have been scratching their heads at Beijing’s increasingly frenzied “wolf warrior” diplomacy, with Chinese diplomats competing with one another to direct the most outlandish abuse possible on their host nations. If this were not damaging enough to its reputation in a post-COVID-19 world, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) continues to hone another tool with which to bludgeon unruly foreigners: hostage diplomacy.
In December 2018, two Canadians, former diplomat Michael Kovrig and businessman Michael Spavor, were detained by Chinese authorities, just days after Huawei Technologies Co chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟) was arrested at Vancouver International Airport on a US warrant for fraud and contravening sanctions against Iran. Despite the suspicious timing, Beijing said that the incidents were entirely unrelated.
Now, after languishing without charges in China’s “black prison” system for 18 months, on Friday last week, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate announced that it had charged Kovrig and Spavor with espionage, a crime punishable with life imprisonment.
Perhaps it is merely a quirk of fate, but just a few weeks prior to the announcement, a Canadian judge on May 27 ruled that proceedings to extradite Meng to the US could go ahead.
In addition, the Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court on June 10 announced that Karm Gilespie, an Australian detained on drug charges for seven years, had been sentenced to death.
Of course, it is purely a coincidence that China and Australia are currently locked in an increasingly bitter diplomatic standoff, Canberra having the temerity to call for an international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hostage diplomacy is a familiar Chinese tactic toward Taiwan. The depressing roll call of Taiwanese who have dissapeared in the past few years into the vortex of the “black prison” system includes human rights advocate Lee Ming-che (李明哲) in 2017, Southern Taiwan Union of Cross-strait Relations Associations chair Tsai Chin-shu (蔡金樹) in 2018 and Morrison Lee (李孟居), a Hsinchu County resident who went missing in Shenzhen last year.
Reacting to the espionage charges against Kovrig and Spavor, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not mince his words.
At a daily briefing on Monday, Trudeau said: “This arbitrary detention of Canadian citizens is unacceptable and deeply concerning, not just to Canadians, but to people around the world who see China using arbitrary detentions as a means to political ends ... It has been obvious from the beginning that this was a political decision made by the Chinese government, and we deplore it and have from the very beginning.”
A prisoner swap that would entail exchanging Meng for Kovrig and Spavor has been mooted by several prominent members of Trudeau’s Liberal Party, including former Canadian deputy prime minister John Manley.
Trudeau dismissed the idea, pointing out that in Canada, the rule of law is sacrosanct. While the terrible plight of individuals wrongfully incarcerated in China is appalling, a prisoner swap would give Beijing exactly what it wants, and would encourage Xi and his cronies to engage in yet more kidnapping of foreign nationals.
Democratic nations must stand firmly together against Beijing’s crude hostage diplomacy, safe in the knowledge that such tactics would ultimately be self-defeating for China. How many foreign companies and individuals are willing to continue investing and doing business in a country where, at any moment, they might be bundled into the back of a van or have their door kicked down in the middle of the night?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS