Wang Mei-hua (王美花) on Saturday formally assumed her new position as head of the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), replacing Shen Jong-chin (沈榮津), who became vice premier. Wang is the third woman in her post, following Christine Tsung (宗才怡) and Ho Mei-yueh (何美玥).
Although the possibility of substantial changes in the government’s economic policies is low, the challenges for the new minister are no less formidable.
Wang has worked at the Intellectual Property Office for 17 years and was its director-general for nearly 10 years. Taking the helm at the MOEA, she has broken with tradition, as usually staff from either the Industrial Development Bureau or the Bureau of Foreign Trade are chosen.
However, as Wang was vice minister of the MOEA for the past four years, her promotion came as no surprise.
It is clear that she was chosen to expedite President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) plans to develop six core strategic industries to transform Taiwan into a critical force in the global economy, as highlighted in Tsai’s inaugural address on May 20.
However, Wang faces the immediate challenges of dealing with the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, renegotiating the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement with China and promoting Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. The key to these is whether she has clear plans.
Additionally, Wang faces the same challenges as her predecessor, such as how to increase domestic investment, encourage private consumption, promote business innovation and transform the nation’s economic structure. Despite her nearly three decades of experience in the public sector, the release of the government’s Triple Stimulus Vouchers on July 15 is to be her first real test as a minister, as it remains to be seen whether the program will effectively boost domestic consumer activity.
Last week, the central bank lowered its forecast for the nation’s GDP growth this year from 1.92 percent to 1.52 percent, which is higher than the 0.8 percent growth forecast for Taiwan by the Asian Development Bank, but lower than the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics’ estimate of 1.67 percent growth. While it would be admirable if Taiwan’s economic growth remained positive compared with most other countries facing deep recessions due to pandemic-related lockdowns, COVID-19 in Taiwan has wreaked havoc on small firms, retailers, airlines, hotels, restaurants and travel agencies.
In other words, Wang must vigorously promote the government’s policies to push the nation’s economic development forward during the post-COVID era. Three government incentive programs that aim to attract investment from Taiwanese businesses have borne fruit and laid solid groundwork for the nation’s so-called “economic revitalization.” The government now needs more workable policies to encourage domestic consumption.
Despite the challenges ahead, it is good that Shen has moved to the post of vice premier. He can continue sharing his expertise, while fostering coordination between Wang, National Development Council Minister Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫), who took office last month, and other ministries.
As major economies are seeking to relocate their global supply chains out of China amid the pandemic, trade tensions and geopolitical conflicts, Taiwan must seize the opportunity to develop itself under a new global economic system and more competent people must be put in charge of the work.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS