Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) on May 15 announced that it would build an advanced semiconductor fab that would mainly deploy 4-nanometer process technology in Phoenix, Arizona.
Most Taiwanese are not aware that Phoenix has become an important chip manufacturing center in the US. Although South San Francisco in the Bay Area is known as Silicon Valley, the tech industry there today has little to do with silicon, or chip, production, except for a few old Intel fabs. Instead, it is more focused on upstream semiconductor industries, such as the Internet, biotech, green energy and artificial intelligence.
Apple, for example, designs its own mobile phones; Google designed a tensor processing unit for artificial intelligence (AI); Nvidia’s graphics processor has been widely adopted by AI, blockchain and bitcoin companies around the world in the past few years. These upstream companies own highly innovative technologies and they basically outsource all their manufacturing to companies like TSMC or United Microelectronics Corp (UMC).
TSMC, which has more than nine advanced IC fabs in Taiwan, is the world’s largest contract chipmaker with the most advanced manufacturing quality. However, in other US high-tech sectors, such as defense, space technology, medical equipment, 5G and self-driving vehicles, plants capable of supplying small batches of high-tech chips are still in demand.
TSMC’s decision to build a fab in the US is clearly based on the huge potential it sees for providing its professional services locally. Regardless of how much political pressure from the US and Taiwanese governments was behind TSMC’s decision, it is a milestone in the internationalization of Taiwan’s technology industry. Past governments have encouraged Taiwanese companies to make global deployments, but without the leading companies taking the lead, who would dare to go it alone?
TSMC aims to start detailed plans for its Phoenix facility next year and to complete construction in 2022-2023, with 4-nanometer chip production targeted to begin in early 2024.
TSMC has a fab in the Southern Taiwan Science Park that has started mass production of 5-nanometer chips. Its plan to set up a more advanced fab deploying 2 to 3-nanometer process technology in Kaohsiung’s Luzhu Science Park has already been approved by the government.
With the emergence of a large number of new technologies, demand for high-end applications is expected to focus on 4 to 7-nanometer chip technology within the next five to seven years. TSMC’s main competitors, such as Samsung and Intel, are doing their utmost to catch up, making 4 to 7-nanometer technology their focus for the next 10 years.
TSMC’s bold plan to build its second 4 to 5-nanometer fab on US soil to be closer to potentially huge new customers is a wise and timely move. Building an advanced fab in the US is based on several important strategic considerations.
First, separating production sites and capabilities is an attempt to reduce the risk of becoming involved in the intensifying US-China technology dispute.
Second, continuing to boost investment in high-end process technologies would help TSMC maintain its leading status in the industry in the long term.
Third, top US university laboratories are leading the world in the research and development of new materials, precision optics, communication technology and digital healthcare, providing geographical proximity for the TSMC US fab to develop next generation 1-nanometer technology.
Sustainable development of an enterprise requires continuous efforts by generations of talent. TSMC founder and former chief executive Morris Chang (張忠謀) achieved great things, and the two co-CEOs who took over are also doing a good job.
It has been said that TSMC is a black hole that sucks in Taiwan’s high-end talent as one of every two graduates from the master’s or doctoral programs of the nation’s four top technology universities end up working for TSMC.
However, this top talent, who are now over the age of 40 and have been trained by TSMC for more than 15 years, are not like their predecessors from the two previous generations, who studied in the US and had experience working in large global companies. The question now is how to better equip them to lead this world-leading enterprise. Transferring them to Phoenix would clearly be a feasible shortcut to giving them the training and experience they need.
From another perspective, building TSMC’s second 4-nanometer plant in Phoenix would release 3,000 to 4,000 graduates from Taiwan’s elite universities to the job market. This would boost the workforce needed by other enterprises with high potential. This group represents Taiwan’s top science and engineering talent, and they would be a great human resources asset to Taiwan and a positive force to transform and upgrade the nation’s industry and enhance its international competitiveness.
Tu Tze-chen is former head of the Industrial Technology Research Institute’s Knowledge-based Economy and Competitiveness Center.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS