The turbine inventor Henrik Stiesdal is small in the shadows of gigantic curves of steel, watching workers weld towers that will be rooted to the seabed. This factory in the Danish countryside has churned out thousands of masts for wind turbines whose blades can stretch more than 150m. It is an important contribution to a global wind revolution that is supplying electricity to millions of homes worldwide.
Soon the factory will set about a new task, manufacturing components for a different kind of turbine, designed by Stiesdal, that bobs on the open sea. These structures promise to put the strong, consistent gusts that blow over deep waters within reach for the first time. The turbines now found around Denmark, England and the other coastlines of the North Sea are made for shallow water and require large underwater structures to fasten them in place.
“Normal places don’t have shallow water near population centers — they have deep water,” said Stiesdal, a legendary turbine inventor and former executive at some of Europe’s biggest wind companies.
Illustration: Mountain People
This situation renders many coastal places unsuitable for wind power.
“We could power California many times over with their offshore resource, but it all has to be floating,” he said.
If the next generation of wind farms could float and if costs could be kept low, it could usher in an era of almost unlimited, emission-free energy. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that floating wind turbines could help provide enough electricity to satisfy the world’s electricity needs 11 times over, based on expected power demand in 2040.
At 63, Stiesdal has taken every step in the modern evolution of wind power.
As a young man he designed the first turbine and later took part in the introduction of the first offshore wind farm, creating what is now one of the fastest-growing forms of renewable energy. He has seen global wind capacity grow from virtually nothing in 1978 to more than 600 gigawatts today, according to BloombergNEF data.
As of the end of last year, about three-quarters of global offshore capacity lay in Europe, mostly clustered around the UK and Germany. This regional dominance owes partly to the North Sea’s relative shallowness.
Although similar waters off China, Vietnam and the eastern US seaboard could someday add more wind farms using established technology, there is greater potential farther offshore. Many more places, including California, Japan and South Korea, have heavy power needs, big ambitions to lower emissions and deep seas. Not to mention that people tend to complain — loudly — about turbines within eyesight of the shore. The open sea is not in anyone’s backyard.
Stiesdal is among those bringing about the floating-energy future. With offshore wind power increasingly competitive with the price of fossil fuels, expansion into deeper waters could help rid electric grids of carbon emissions for good.
“I had some bad moments thinking about the climate,” he said. “The politicians will not solve it. We need to solve it ourselves.”
After he finished high school in rural Denmark in the late 1970s, Stiesdal heard about a nearby teachers’ college that was running an experiment to generate electricity from wind. He decided to try making a model turbine in his family’s home. He built the first blades from steel and high-grade nylon, working on the living room floor as his mother knitted on the sofa.
The first turbine he made was small enough that he could lift it with one hand.
“Once you got it spinning, it got to be alive, and you could feel all the small things in the wind,” Stiesdal recalled. “I was hooked.”
It worked well enough that he got a local machinist to help him build a bigger version that could provide power to his family’s farm.
A few years later, with more tinkering, he had scaled up to a point that it took two people to carry a blade. Executives from a local manufacturer of hydraulic cranes came over to check out his turbines and drink coffee. Replacing expensive, polluting fossil fuels with wind made sense, even before climate change became a pressing concern.
Stiesdal struck a licensing agreement with the executives, which eventually led to mass production and later a full rebranding as Vestas Wind Systems A/S. The company is the world’s largest wind turbine manufacturer, with revenue of more than US$13 billion last year.
In its official corporate history, Vestas acknowledges that its earliest efforts — designed to look like an egg whisk — failed to produce enough electricity to be viable.
However, Stiesdal’s prototypes are “essentially the same three-blade model used today,” it says.
And not only by Vestas: The same configuration is used all over the world — by scores of manufacturers.
The inventor worked with Vestas until the mid-1980s, then went on to a job at Bonus Energy, a Danish turbine company that was later bought by German industrial giant Siemens AG. That was where he orchestrated the introduction in 1991 of the first offshore turbines able to withstand harsh conditions at sea.
“He’s like the godfather of wind,” said Tom Harries, head of wind research at BloombergNEF.
Offshore turbines are scattered around the world by the thousands, the product of billions of dollars of investment. The latest and largest, a 262m-high machine from Siemens Gamesa that is be tested next year in northern Denmark, is almost as tall as New York’s Chrysler Building.
As turbines have multiplied and spread, costs have fallen sharply, down more than 60 percent in the past decade.
In the next two decades, the IEA expects the offshore industry to attract US$840 billion — almost as much investment as natural gas. Most of the biggest developers now are European power companies such as Denmark’s Orsted, Germany’s RWE and Spain’s Iberdrola, which have increasingly shifted away from fossil fuels. In China, the second-biggest offshore market after Europe, companies such as China Ming Yang Wind Power Group and Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology have sold hundreds of turbines domestically.
“The cork is coming off the bottle,” Stiesdal said. “With the cost reductions we’re seeing, we’re outcompeting with all kinds of fuels. You can’t build gas-fired plants and coal plants and nuclear plants that can match wind.”
A successful floating platform would push open new wind markets and potentially generate billions of dollars of turbine contracts. The earliest glimpses of this future, ironically, come from pilot projects started by fossil fuel companies, which have long expertise in extracting resources from the seabed using platforms. Designs for wind versions vary, but the most prevalent use steel or concrete to support a single turbine.
Some models have a tube shape, with a turbine on one corner. Others look more like a buoy, with a turbine bobbing on top.
The main engineering challenge is keeping the machine in the right position; a slight rotation can move the blades out of the wind. The designs rely on cables and anchors to keep the platforms in the right spot. Buoyant turbines fitted with anchors can be put out at sea in water as deep as 1,000m.
On the economic side, “the key bottleneck is the floating foundation,” said Jason Cheng, managing partner at private equity firm Kerogen Capital. “We think that’s where a great amount of the value will be captured.”
Kerogen mostly invests in fossil fuels, but it has taken a stake in Ideol, a French platform developer.
Cheng said he liked that floating wind draws on proven technologies.
“Because it’s already been developed in oil and gas, we know what those solutions could look like,” he said.
If floating platforms are to help wind power achieve anything like the almost unlimited capacity anticipated by the IEA, companies would have to bring down costs.
Floating introduces a whole new expense in the manufacture and installation of platforms, in part because mooring cables get more expensive as water gets deeper. Transportation costs could be lower, because floating platforms can be towed from port rather than erected at sea, but that is not enough to offset the cost of a technology that is not designed for mass production.
“It’s not copy-paste from oil and gas,” said Manahil Lakhmiri, head of offshore wind at ENGIE, which is working with California-based Principle Power on a floating pilot project off Portugal.
“What we see today is there’s one floater made every three months,” she added. “We need one floater per week.”
That is a problem Stiesdal has solved before. The turbines he helped pioneer proved quite scalable — they became as prevalent as they did because their components could be produced quickly and cheaply. His new floating platform, dubbed TetraSpar and backed by oil giant Royal Dutch Shell PLC and German utility Innogy SE, aims to industrialize the industry.
He is also working with Welcon A/S, one of the largest turbine tower manufacturers. That has allowed Stiesdal, an independent inventor, to create a prototype at factory speeds.
His platform is predominantly made with the same materials as a turbine tower, with much of the labor at the Danish factory done by robots. Machines roll out the steel and do most of the welding, while workers fit pieces together and perform finishing touches.
“It would be quite easy to mass manufacture them,” Welcon project manager Rune Holm said. “If you want the industrialization, you should use some of the knowledge you already have.”
Stiesdal’s competitors include Norway’s Equinor ASA, the first developer to get a floating wind farm out on the water, a pilot project of five turbines off the coast of Scotland in the North Sea. The firm plans to scale up with a larger venture in Norway that is expected to cost about US$500 million.
Another major competitor is Principle Power, which is backed by Spanish oil company Repsol SA and EDP Energias de Portugal SA. Principle has already tested its design in the Atlantic with some of the largest turbines on the market.
Even with a mere handful of floating pilot projects out on the sea, energy analysts predict exponential growth to follow fast after the technology is established. If floating wind reaches 3.5 gigawatts by 2030, as BloombergNEF forecasts, that pace would track the one followed by traditional offshore wind. Much will depend on governments; offshore wind took off only with the help of subsidies, and it is unclear whether and in what form help will continue.
Later this year, or possibly early next year, depending on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, a truck would haul Stiesdal’s floating device to the Danish coast. A boat would tow it to Norway. The next step would be to build up to test a much larger turbine. If all goes well, the man who helped start the wind industry could jump to the front of the race for the next clean-energy breakthrough. The stakes, measured in increments of global temperatures, are rising fast.
“The trajectory today is not even 2 degrees — it’s much higher,” Stiesdal said. “The mantra I’ve had myself was we need to change the question from ‘How can we afford it?’ to ‘How can we afford not to?’”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95