In Taiwan, we leave youth behind when we turn 18. At that age, we must take full legal responsibility for any criminal actions we commit. When we turn 20, we become adults, and must take full legal responsibility for our civil actions, and can, for example, enter into contracts.
As a result of this two-year difference, it has been proposed that the law be amended to lower the age of adulthood from 20 to 18. This might be in line with the global trend, but it would have far-reaching effects.
At the end of March, there were approximately 550,000 people in Taiwan aged 18 to 20, and 52 percent of them were male. Although fewer people will join this age group for every coming year, their rights and benefits still require careful planning.
From a legal perspective, much thought has gone into the many different age-related restrictions, such as 16 for the age of consent and 40 as the minimum age for presidential candidates.
There is quite a difference between civil and criminal responsibility, and perhaps the reason for the inconsistency is this: People are expected to fully recognize criminal behavior at an earlier age, but are given two more years to comprehend more complex civil responsibilities, such as contracts and exchanges. Still, this is as much a restriction as it is an opportunity to learn.
Because the actions of minors are restricted, contracts they enter into are only be binding if they are recognized by the their legal guardian — normally their parents — unless it is a straightforward matter of profit or meeting daily needs.
As an example, I have on many occasions had to help first and second-year university students dissolve controversial contracts when they are unable to pay the monthly installments after purchasing teaching materials for tens of thousands of New Taiwan dollars. If the age of adulthood is lowered, that would no longer be possible.
These restrictions on the binding force of contracts are said to be there for protection, but it also causes problems for those who want to open a bank account, or apply for an ID document or student loan, as they need the approval of their parents. This problem becomes particularly obvious when their parents have divorced, as this often makes it difficult to obtain the approval of both.
In 2018, 68,619 minors came from divorced families and the parents of 14,801 of those — about 22 percent — had shared custody. This is something policymakers should keep in mind.
The Civil Code stipulates that parents have the right and the obligation to protect and raise their children. In most child-support related lawsuits, alimony is to be paid monthly until the children turn 20.
The net school enrollment rate for 20-year-old Taiwanese is 73 percent, the highest in the world. This is compared with 51.8 percent in the US and 26.3 percent in Germany.
If parents are no longer responsible for their children after they turn 18, that would have a significant impact on students.
The Civil Code also stipulates that if a minor infringes on the rights of another, their parents in principle share the responsibility for compensation, as is vividly depicted in the family drama A Sun (陽光普照). Legislators should therefore also consider whether an amendment to the law would have an impact on the protection of victims.
Furthermore, a search using the keyword “adult” turns up 359 related laws, from minor issues such as applying for a household registration document to major issues such as organ transplants. All these issues would have to be reviewed to ascertain the overall feasibility of any proposed amendment.
As a reference, there is a four-year transitional period when entering adulthood in Japan. Adulthood also involves accumulating social experience, but the elementary and secondary stages of our 12-year education system focus mainly on written tests, which means that students for many years have little contact with society at large.
This is probably the most important complementary measure that should be considered in connection to any amendment to the law.
Chen Jwu-shang is a professor at National Kaohsiung Normal University’s General Education Center.
Translated by Perry Svensson
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS