While the Netherlands Trade and Investment Office on Monday changing its name to the Netherlands Office Taipei is a much-welcomed development for bilateral ties, it was not that drastic of a move as some — including Beijing — make it out to be, as the name “Taiwan” is still not included in the office’s title.
The name change can be seen as a symbolic gesture, as it was announced on the same day that the Netherlands sent 3,999 tulips and stroopwafels to thank Taiwan’s medical workers on King’s Day, its national day.
It also came during a sensitive time when China has been under fire for its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, while Taiwan, which has done a stellar job in containing the virus, has been offering its expertise and medical equipment to other countries — including the donation of 600,000 masks to the Netherlands.
As expected, China expressed outrage at the name change. The state-run Global Times newspaper called it a “provocative move” that is “destructive to regional stability,” saying that the Netherlands might face a backlash — including the suspension of medical aid during the pandemic, and the cancelation of people-to-people exchanges and certain trade projects.
This is the same publication that on March 19 called Taiwan’s pandemic control efforts “seriously flawed,” while lauding China’s efforts as a “miracle.”
Ironically, the Netherlands is one of the countries that recalled hundreds of thousands of faulty masks imported from China last month.
In a statement on Monday, it called Taiwan’s efforts “another Taiwan miracle” that has “deepened the friendship between the Netherlands and Taiwan.”
China has asked the Netherlands to provide answers. The official statement by Dutch Representative Guy Wittich said that the words “trade and investment” were dropped as to be more inclusive of other areas in which the two nations have been collaborating. China is not likely to buy that and it remains to be seen what will happen.
The office’s Chinese name (荷蘭在台辦事處) can indeed be seen as ambiguous, as it does not specify whether the character tai (台) refers to Taiwan or Taipei, but its English name spells it out as Taipei.
Adding “Taipei” to the office’s name should not be a big deal, as Taiwan has long been forced to compete in international events under the name “Chinese Taipei.”
Many other de facto embassies in Taiwan do this — for example, the French Office in Taipei employs the same word choice in both Chinese and English, as does the German Institute Taipei. The UK office made the exact same change as the Netherlands in 2015, but it reiterated that it sees Taiwan as a province of China and that Taiwan-UK ties are “strong, but unofficial” in response to a petition for the UK to recognize Taiwan in 2016.
China’s oppression of Taiwan should not be condoned under any circumstances, still, its anger toward Japan for changing its office’s name to the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in 2017 made more sense.
The latest debacle further highlights to the world China’s blatant and unreasonable oppression of Taiwan. Taiwanese and Chinese experts have said that the decision might cause other nations to follow suit.
Nevertheless, it is a positive step, as relations between Taiwan and the international community are growing, despite the nation’s continued diplomatic isolation.
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS