Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) on Sunday posted a video on Facebook to tout his determination to reform the party, dressed as renowned military strategist Zhuge Liang (諸葛亮) of China’s Three Kingdoms Period, but armed with a tablet computer and manipulating digital data projected in front of him.
It was part of Chiang’s attempts to overhaul the party’s image, to appeal — albeit in a clumsy and patronizing way — to a younger generation of voters, who he believes are instrumental to transforming how the party is seen by the electorate.
In another Facebook post, Chiang said that the KMT used to be very young, and that it does not necessarily need to be associated with old people and outdated ideas.
It is true that the KMT used to be very young, but it was not young in Zhuge’s day. It would not exist for another 17 centuries after he died. The association, of course, was an attempt to tie the party to a recognizable motif representing traditional Chinese culture.
Chiang is clearly signaling this linkage. Do not expect a change to the party’s name or its connections with China under his watch.
The juxtaposition of the tablet computer was obvious enough. Chiang wants more input from younger party members, but if he gets it, he would have to act on it. It cannot result only in superficial changes to the party’s image.
If he hopes to achieve substantial change with help from a younger generation, and not elicit a backlash from the party’s old guard, he needs the kind of strategic genius that Zhuge himself would have envied.
He is also going to have to move quickly. He won the chairmanship in a by-election after former chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) fell on his sword to take responsibility for the party’s defeats in the Jan. 11 presidential and legislative elections. The next full chairmanship election is due next year.
Chiang is seeking to transform the party’s image using a two-pronged approach: recruiting the younger generation, while also preventing embarrassing gaffes by elected KMT representatives.
One example of the latter is KMT Legislator Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷), who has been giving Chiang quite a headache with a string of controversial statements and requests in the legislature.
Chiang favors gentle persuasion to inform errant representatives of the error of their ways, backed up by the party disciplinary committee should they fail to comply, but Wu has failed to comply.
Chiang is now mooting a new mechanism to remove legislators-at-large deemed to be damaging the party’s image.
Chiang has said before that the older generation within the party is supportive of reform. That was before the younger generation proposed any new ideas. If he fails to make changes based on this input, he would be seen as fraudulent for failing to take the younger members seriously.
If he makes changes that anger influential individuals or interest groups within the party, he could lose the chairmanship next year. If he balks at reigning in Wu, other legislators could feel emboldened to continue acting as they see fit. He would also be seen as procrastinating or spineless, which would only make his job more difficult.
If Chiang acts too decisively and throws the book at a stubborn Wu, he is going to send a signal that many loyal party members would find deeply concerning. More importantly, Wu is just the most visible entrenched problem among proponents of the old KMT mindset.
Voters must wait and see how effectively Chiang can channel Zhuge’s genius in the coming months.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS