Support for the demands of pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong has grown even as rallies have paused due to the coronavirus outbreak, according to a survey conducted for Reuters, which also showed a widespread lack of confidence in the government’s ability to manage the COVID-19 crisis.
Demands for the resignation of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) were supported by 63 percent of respondents in the poll, conducted by the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute from March 17 to March 20, versus 57 percent in a poll it conducted in December last year.
Supporters of the protests outnumbered opponents by a ratio of roughly two to one, with 28 percent against them compared with 30 percent in a poll in December, and 58 percent supporting them, versus 59 percent previously.
The poll showed a significant increase in the levels of support for key demands of the demonstrations which rattled the territory for most of last year and into early January before the coronavirus crisis.
The survey also showed a widespread lack of confidence in the government’s coronavirus measures, with 54 percent expressing distrust and 33 percent giving a thumbs-up.
The anti-government protests escalated in June over a now-withdrawn bill that would have allowed extraditions of defendants to mainland China, and later morphed into a movement for greater democracy in the territory.
Many protesters say that Beijing has used its authority under the “one country, two systems” formula, agreed when Britain handed over the territory to China in 1997, to undermine freedoms enjoyed in Hong Kong that are unavailable in the mainland.
“It is understandable that protesters resort to extreme means,” said Patrick Yeung, a 32-year-old IT worker who responded to the survey. “I hope Beijing can meddle less in Hong Kong’s affairs, which could actually stabilize Hong Kong and curb people’s anger.”
Beijing denies meddling in Hong Kong and blames the West for fomenting unrest.
Lam’s office and China’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, which falls under the Chinese State Council, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Support for universal suffrage in Hong Kong, a core demand of protesters aimed at strengthening the territory’s level of autonomy, rose to 68 percent from 60 percent in December.
An independent commission of inquiry, which protesters want to look into how the police handled demonstrations, was supported by 76 percent of respondents versus 74 percent previously.
The demands of the protesters “haven’t been diluted, or forgotten, due to the epidemic situation,” said Ma Ngok (馬嶽), associate professor of government and public administration at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Opposition to the demands of the protesters has remained virtually unchanged at 15 percent.
“The government should investigate the culprits behind the political crisis and should not accede to other demands from the protesters,” said another respondent, Ming Hon, an unemployed 49-year-old who moved to Hong Kong from mainland China recently and had jobs in cleaning and construction.
For the poll, which had a margin of error of 3.2 percentage points, 1,001 respondents were randomly surveyed by telephone in Cantonese, which is spoken by the vast majority of Hong Kongers.
The results were weighted according to the latest population figures.
Following a large rally on New Year’s Day in which some protesters clashed with police, crowds on the streets have dropped from many thousands to a few hundred as Hong Kongers adopted social distancing to fight the coronavirus.
Some recent protests focused on the government’s decision not to fully close the border with mainland China, where the virus is believed to have originated. The administration has since banned all tourist arrivals.
Although Hong Kong has won praise for limiting the outbreak to about 450 cases and four deaths, the poll showed that many citizens remain distrustful of the government.
“The results in combating the pandemic are because of the self-discipline of Hong Kong people. The government has nothing to do with it,” said Evelyn Lau, a 23-year-old tutor who participated in the poll.
Another key finding of the survey is that while calls for Hong Kong’s independence from China grew within the margin of error, opposition to the idea has dropped significantly and indifference has increased dramatically.
Support for independence rose from 17 percent in December to 20 percent, but opposition tumbled from 68 percent to 56 percent, and those not leaning either way doubled to 18 percent.
“People talk more about it, so it becomes more easy to accept,” said Samson Yuen (袁瑋熙), an assistant professor in the political science department at Lingnan University, referring to the independence issue. “When people talk more about ‘liberating Hong Kong,’ it shifts the frame.”
With Hong Kong Legislative Council elections due in September, the pro-democracy/pro-Beijing split remained virtually unchanged from last year’s district council vote, with 58 percent saying they would vote for a pro-democracy candidate and 22 percent for a pro-Beijing one, with the rest undecided or not planning to vote.
The degree of support for the protests varied sharply by age, education and whether respondents were born in Hong Kong. Younger and better-educated people born in the territory were far more likely to lean toward pro-democracy or support the protests.
The poll, the second in a series commissioned by Reuters from the independent polling firm to gauge public sentiment amid the territory’s worst political crisis in decades, showed respondents mainly blamed Lam’s administration for the state of affairs.
About 43 percent of respondents primarily blamed the Hong Kong government, compared with 47 percent in the previous poll, while 14 percent blamed the central government in Beijing versus 12 percent in December.
The police and protesters were blamed by about 10 percent each in both polls.
Many protesters say they are incensed by what they see as an abuse of power by the police in dealing with the unrest.
The police say they have used reasonable and appropriate force against illegal acts including vandalism and rioting.
China has denounced acts of violence in the protests, which it sees as being aimed at undermining Chinese sovereignty.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS