Virus brings opportunities
Taiwan needs to be taken seriously as a global entity. Now is the time to make that happen. From Johns Hopkins University’s COVID-19 dashboard recognizing Taiwan as a distinct entity from China to the pages of the Journal of the American Medical Association and news outlets like the Guardian, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, Taiwan is experiencing an incredible surge in its international image.
I speak as a Taiwanese living in North America. People still confuse Taiwan and Thailand. Others are surprised to hear that Taiwanese is a distinct language. For many, Taiwan’s claim to fame is its exportation of bubble tea, although even then few know its true origins. And I am speaking of university graduates. This is sad and it needs to be rectified.
The potential for a new conversation is emerging. As headlines continue to spotlight Taiwan, there is an opportunity for Taiwanese to highlight their country’s tremendous response to the pandemic in their respective places globally.
This is sensible because it helps people to learn from what has been effective in a scary time, but it is also important because it creates awareness around Taiwan’s strengths.
Even from within Taiwan, in a time of global turmoil and uncertainty, it is a time to celebrate a country uniting to fight the pandemic.
Taiwan’s containment of the virus is nothing short of incredible. The international community has clearly noticed. That this has been accomplished while the WHO continues to reject Taiwan’s sovereign status is even more compelling. Add to this military intimidation and the fact that there was an infected individual on the first evacuation plane from China to Taiwan and you have something worth writing about in the history books.
This is the momentum behind Taiwan’s work. Taiwanese need to realize this and carry it beyond this COVID-19 pandemic.
The next few months will provide an opportunity for the international community to continue studying Taiwan’s response to the pandemic and what made it so efficacious. Taiwan should be ready to embrace this, but it must facilitate this process while advocating for the nation’s sovereignty.
Governmental collaboration should encourage each country to formally recognize and even bolster Taiwan’s independent status. Businesses and medical enterprises should similarly develop bonds with Taiwan as a distinct country. Pressure should continue to be applied to international organizations like the WHO.
As the world’s doubts grow regarding China’s handling of the novel coronavirus, its atrocious treatment of its own people through “re-education” camps, and the overall wisdom of ties with China, Taiwan must continue to pave a separate path. This must begin with Taiwanese recognizing their own identity in Taiwan and elsewhere, and wearing it as a badge of honor.
Liao Li De
Toronto, Canada
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US