The COVID-19 pandemic presents many challenges, including how to handle Taiwanese businesspeople living in China who want to return to Taiwan for Tomb Sweeping Day, also known as the Qingming Festival.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the Central Epidemic Command Center, has said, citing information from the Straits Exchange Foundation, that many businesspeople are not keen to return, because they must undergo 14 days of home quarantine.
Minister of the Interior Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇) has said that, to prevent the spread of the disease, more people are interested in “online tomb sweeping” to pay their respects to their ancestors without having to go to the actual site of the tomb.
This outbreak presents an opportunity to reflect on the meaning of the holiday.
The long Qingming Festival weekend is a relatively new invention. Traditionally, the holiday fell on the third day of the third lunar month, and families would arrange a time for tomb sweeping duties prior to that date. This is why there was no sudden rush of crowds descending on cemeteries.
After Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) passed away, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) encouraged people to observe Qingming and set a new date for it, changing it from the original lunar calendar date to April 5, the day of Chiang’s death.
This is why there is an old and a new tomb sweeping day. The change was intended to commemorate the “glorious leader” at the same time that people paid respects to their own deceased relatives. The holiday was later combined with a long weekend, and came to be associated with large crowds and traffic jams.
Qingming also became a part of the KMT regime’s indoctrination of Taiwanese.
From the political elite attending public memorials at the Mausoleum of the Yellow Emperor in China to the tomb sweeping custom among ordinary people, the ultimate goal was to foster a connection between an ethnic group and families within that group, to foster ideals of loyalty and filial piety, and to form an unbreakable hold over racial identity and moral principle.
Through commemoration and veneration of the forbears of the family line, descendants would pay careful attention to their parents’ funerary rites to give them a strong sense of belonging, and this would create the moral ties to facilitate governance and rule over the country.
Fabricated lineages would, in turn, be used to control Taiwanese relations and strengthen the Chinese identity among Pingpu Aborigines.
The Democratic Progressive Party government should consider decoupling Qingming from the commemoration of Chiang’s death and, in the interests of transitional justice and fostering a Taiwanese identity, restore the original customs of the holiday.
It should also abolish the long holiday weekend, allowing Taiwanese to choose when to pay their respects to their ancestors in the two-month period between the end of the Lunar New Year break and the lunar Qingming.
This would not only address the problem of long traffic jams on freeways during the long weekend, it would also divest this simple ancestor worship festival of its political baggage.
Chen Ching-kuen is an assistant professor.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS