While the world is struggling under the weight of responding to the COVID-19 outbreak, it remains important not to be distracted from issues that were playing out before the pandemic took hold.
One of these is the safety and basic human rights of protesters in Hong Kong. It is safe to assume that Beijing has been preparing for the resumption of the protests when the pandemic recedes.
Several recently published reports serve as a reminder of the lingering dangers — social, political and economic — Hong Kong faces while the world is distracted. The anti-extradition protests hit the economy, but the damage to Hong Kong’s reputation as a business hub goes deeper.
The Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom measures the freedom of trade, business, investment and property rights of countries worldwide. Hong Kong’s economy was ranked the freest in the 25 years from 1995 to last year. In this year’s ranking it slipped to second place, ceding the top slot to Singapore. It is not that Singapore scored higher this year: Hong Kong’s slide is due to a 10-point drop in its investment freedom rating.
According to the foundation’s analysis, investment flows have been dampened because the territory’s reputation as a business hub has been eroded by the ongoing political and social turmoil, of which the anti-extradition protests — which have evolved into a call for wider democratic reforms — are only the most recent, and most serious, manifestation.
The report also said that Hong Kong fell into recession last year because of the increasing integration of its traditionally open, market-driven economy with China through trade, tourism and financial links.
Hong Kong’s long-standing image as the freest economy in the world is being tarnished by its integration into the Chinese economy, with concerns over the effect of this on its open, rules-based, just system, and the political and social turmoil caused by Hong Kongers’ response to Beijing’s accelerated pace of this integration under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
As a harbinger of the coming storm, Reuters yesterday reported that credible sources, including a legislator and a foreign diplomat, had revealed that officers from the People’s Armed Police (PAP), China’s top internal security force, had joined Hong Kong police to monitor the protests last year. The diplomat and other foreign envoys also estimated that there are now 4,000 PAP personnel in Hong Kong.
In addition to the legal implications of this, which are further evidence of the erosion of rule of law in the territory, observers are concerned that the PAP could be involved in a crackdown if the protests resume, the report said.
Its involvement would be met with the condemnation of the international community, but even if it does not get involved, Hong Kong police are expected to take a stronger stance regarding the next wave of protests. From what has been observed of the protesters’ resolve, this would only escalate tensions.
In addition to the implications concerning the safety of Hong Kongers, expectation alone would do little to improve investor confidence in the territory.
The current lull in the protests might have given the false impression that the worst is over, and that the territory can return to its first-place ranking in next year’s index. It is not, and likely will not.
The protests are largely expected to resume later this year, when the epidemic is deemed under control and prior to legislative elections in September.
While Beijing and Hong Kong authorities are formulating their plans, it is important for the international community, as well as the government — and the opposition — here in Taiwan to make clear that they are watching, and that a violent crackdown would not be tolerated.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
RSS