On Feb. 25, the second day of US President Donald Trump’s first state visit to India, he signed off on an arms deal package worth US$3.5 billion, which is expected to include 24 Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk anti-submarine warfare helicopters for the Indian Navy and six Boeing AH-64E Apache attack helicopters for the Indian Army.
A report by Chinese-language online news outlet Up Media said that Taiwan is the US’ next target buyer.
In 2014, the Republic of China (ROC) Navy proposed purchasing new anti-submarine warfare helicopters from the US.
Since then, the US has been asking whether Taiwan is interested in procuring the MH-60R, which is manufactured by Lockheed Martin’s Sikorsky Aircraft.
Although Taiwan in 2015 rejected the US company’s offer of eight to 10 MH-60R helicopters at a price of about US$80 million each due to cost considerations, the navy still keeps the MH-60R on its procurement list because its fleet of anti-submarine helicopters is very old.
In 1991, Taiwan procured its first batch of 10 Sikorsky S-70C(M)-1 anti-submarine warfare helicopters through “Shen-ying Project I” to form the navy’s 701st Helicopter Squadron.
A decade later, the navy procured another 11 Sikorsky S-70C(M)-2 anti-submarine helicopters through “Shen-ying Project II,” bringing the navy’s number of helicopters in the S-70 series to 21.
Thirty years later, these helicopters are in critical danger due to material shortages and because manufacturing sources are disappearing. Their airframes and avionics systems have never undergone a mid-life upgrade.
Compared with the ROC Air Force’s Air Rescue Group, whose S-70C search-and-rescue helicopters were retired on Feb. 14 after 30 years of service, the navy still hangs on to the S-70C(M)-1 as a frontline helicopter although its combat capabilities are truly worrying.
Given the limited national defense budget, the Ministry of National Defense should evaluate whether procurement is Taiwan’s only option.
Taiwan could learn from Singapore, a nation that never hesitates to spend large sums on weapons and whose military expenditure is not restricted by its proportion of the GDP.
If Taiwan chooses to buy eight new MH-60Rs to replace its fleet, the navy’s 21 S-70C(M)-1/2 helicopters could probably be used for training purposes or replacement parts.
Moreover, as a large part of the national defense budget could go to domestically built surface warships and the “Indigenous Defense Submarine” program, there would hardly be any budget left to allocate to the procurement of new anti-submarine warfare helicopters or upgrade existing aircraft.
On the other hand, the navy has about 20 warships that are classed as 3,000 tonnes and above and are equipped with hangar facilities, so acquiring eight new MH-60R helicopters does not meet the needs of even a single fleet.
The navy should distance itself from the US’ political-commercial marketing strategy and follow the example of the Singaporean Navy, which does not waste government funds.
When Singapore took delivery of two new S-70B Seahawks in 2018, the country also decided to upgrade its navy’s six older Seahawks to the same standard. This means that Singapore only spent half the budget required to acquire eight of the latest S-70B Seahawks.
Perhaps Taiwan should opt for procuring three S-70C helicopters to supplement the three that have crashed, while upgrading its remaining 18.
It would benefit the public if the government could maximize its use of the national defense budget.
Chang Feng-lin is a doctoral student.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom, sparked by the arrival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, took the world by storm. Within weeks, everyone was talking about it, trying it and had an opinion. It has transformed the way people live, work and think. The trend has only accelerated. The AI snowball continues to roll, growing larger and more influential across nearly every sector. Higher education has not been spared. Universities rushed to embrace this technological wave, eager to demonstrate that they are keeping up with the times. AI literacy is now presented as an essential skill, a key selling point to attract prospective students.
RSS