There have been frequent reports in the local media recently that the foliage of bald cypress trees has been changing color from green to yellow and red, creating spectacular scenery, and that this seasonal foliage stands in breathtaking contrast to lush green meadows and azure skies. These reports, however, show a worrisome lack of ecological and environmental awareness.
As a result of the commercial hype, many Taiwanese have jumped on the bandwagon in recent years and planted bald cypresses — a species that mainly belongs in temperate zones — for gardening and landscaping, without considering the risk that arbitrary planting could cause an environmental disaster.
There is an endless list of instances where alien species have brought harm to Taiwan’s natural ecology, for example by non-native plant species such as white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala), climbing hemp vine or mile-a-minute vine (Mikania micrantha), and exotic animal species such as the golden apple snail, the red-eared slider turtle, and suckermouth catfish, to name just a few better-known species.
The bald or swamp cypress (Taxodium distichum) is a deciduous conifer in the family Cupressaceae. It is native to the southeastern US. Hardy and tough, it adapts to a wide range of soil types, whether wet, dry or swampy. It is noted for the russet-red fall color of its lacy needles.
The species would not create much havoc if planted in ponds or swamps, but the problem is that in Taiwan, the bald cypress is often planted in the plains, in gardens or along sidewalks.
If there is enough water, various sizes of cypress knees will grow out of the ground around the tree like stalagmites, ranging in height from 5cm to 60cm. Part of the tree’s root system projected above ground, cypress knees are a hindrance to the survival of other plants. This root structure not only damages the ecosystem, it can also trip up pedestrians.
Every six to 10 years, Taiwanese businesspeople make a strong push for non-native plants to promote their own commercial interests. Media outlets often add fuel to the flames, creating a short-lived sensation. The public hastily hops onto the bandwagon and starts planting these non-native species without paying attention to their potential damage to the ecosystem.
If there is excessive expansion or if prices plunge, the plants are pulled up and dumped in some random place. When this happens and their seeds are dispersed by wind or through animals, and if they manage to adapt to the local environment, they become invasive species.
Strong invasive species cause ecological damage far greater than expected when they were first introduced. Some examples from the more distant past are common lantana (Lantana camara), common water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), white leadtree and African touch-me-not (Impatiens walleriana).
Over the past few years, the climbing hemp vine has been a headache for the agricultural and ecological conservation authorities. Because the plant grows so fast, it is also called “mile-a-minute vine/weed.” Its seeds are very viable, and roots and buds can grow from every node of the vine’s creeping stem that touches the soil, while internodal space can produce adventitious roots, allowing the plant to reproduce asexually in the form of a vegetative mass.
These features make it very difficult to completely eliminate the plant. The vine was originally introduced to Taiwan by the authorities for soil and water conservation purposes thanks to its fast reproduction and greening effect. The disaster caused by the plant was unexpected.
According to a 2002 report by the Endemic Species Research Institute, the vine spread across 56,847.78 hectares of land, and agricultural losses were hard to estimate.
If non-native plants bring harm, agricultural losses will amount to several billion or even tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars, although sometimes the effects will only manifest themselves 10 or 20 years later. Planting non-native plants, such as bald cypress, requires cautious evaluation and planning.
Someone who blindly follows trends could end up hurting Taiwan’s ecological system.
Jerome Su is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University’s Graduate Institute of Translation and Interpretation.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has