The presidential candidates have finally touched on the issue of university education in their campaigns, although most of the attention has been paid to subsidies for short-term study abroad programs and student loans, not the deeper crisis facing higher education in Taiwan.
At a time when half of the universities face closure within the next five years, many private universities are prioritizing students over teachers for the sake of student retention, and the Ministry of Education is merely kicking the can down the road.
The ministry held an industry-academia seminar, during which officials obsessed over flipped higher education and innovative vocational education, while private university presidents were saying that the most urgent task is to attract enough students to survive.
For organizations that have fallen on hard times, vision and mission statements are noble, but unlikely to save the day.
Despite being nonprofit organizations, universities essentially operate as businesses, and this is particularly true for private universities, which lose not only income, but also ministry subsidies when they fail to recruit enough students.
However, while schools have been counting heads and making every effort to recruit and retain students, they have tolerated students neglecting their studies. As a result, professors either do not dare or are unwilling to be tough on students.
Even if every senior and vocational high-school student applied to a university, there would still be a shortfall in student numbers.
Many young people who should not have gone to college have done so, wasting school resources and their own time, when they could have found jobs more suited to their personalities and skillsets straight out of high school.
Unfortunately, enthusiastic parents force them to attend college against their will, causing ridiculous world records, such as university admission rates as high as 90 percent or more.
Despite the seriousness of the situation, and even though it has legal tools such as the “sunset clause” and the university withdrawal mechanism, the government has failed to find a solution.
However, the sunset clause takes time and universities must transform themselves to withdraw from the market.
The ministry demands that poorly managed universities withdraw from the market, but it also refuses to allow schools to change their land and building use.
Despite its attempt to terminate schools with poor enrollment rates through “mercy killing,” the government is delaying the termination process.
The delay harms society, the government, universities and the students, but indifferent officials care only about themselves.
The number of Taiwanese of college age is expected to fall below 110,000 next year.
The numbers are forecast to continue to drop by 6,000 to 7,000 students per year, until it only totals 75,000 by 2025.
By that time, public universities are likely to pick up 50,000 Taiwanese of college age, while nearly 80 colleges and universities fight for the remaining 25,000.
Ultimately, that could mean that at least 50 schools would end up with no one to teach.
Maybe part of the ministry’s wishful thinking is to confiscate barren campus properties one after the other as these universities close down. It is a worrying thought.
Andrew Huang is a visiting professor at Finland’s Aalto University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS