In Lebanon they are against a tax on WhatsApp and endemic corruption. In Chile, a hike in the metro fare and rampant inequality. In Hong Kong, an extradition bill and creeping authoritarianism. In Algeria, a fifth term for an aging president and decades of military rule.
The protests raging today and in the past months on the streets of cities around the world have varying triggers. However, the fuel is familiar: stagnating middle classes, stifled democracy and the bone-deep conviction that things can be different — even if the alternative is not always clear.
Few corners of the world have been spared significant protests this year. Russia, Serbia, Ukraine and Albania have all seen major demonstrations. So have the UK, against Brexit, France, with its yellow vest movement, and Spain, in the restive region of Catalonia.
Illustration: Mountain People
The Middle East has convulsed with so much dissent that some are calling it a second wave of the Arab Spring. In South America, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela have experienced popular unrest. The list goes on.
“The data shows that the amount of protests is increasing and is as high as the roaring 60s, and has been since about 2009,” said Jacquelien van Stekelenburg, a professor who studies social change and conflict at Vrije University in Amsterdam.
Not all the protests are driven by economic complaints, but widening gulfs between the haves and have-nots are radicalizing many young people in particular.
Oxfam in January said that the world’s 26 richest individuals owned as much wealth as the poorest half of the global population. Billionaires grew their combined fortunes by US$2.5 billion a day last year, while the relative wealth of the world’s poorest 3.8 billion people declined by US$500 million a day.
Thousands of people have joined rolling Extinction Rebellion protests at the lack of action on the climate crisis by leaders content to leave the problem to the next generation.
The Internet is not a determining factor — there was no social media in the 1960s — but is clearly important. Social media and the explosion of access to information are reordering hierarchies of knowledge and communication.
Authorities can fight back with extensive surveillance regimes or with digital blackouts of the kind India recently imposed in disputed Kashmir, but 20th-century power structures are under enormous pressure, analysts say.
“The traditional system of enforcing power from top to bottom is increasingly being challenged,” French Institute of International Relations executive chairman Thierry de Montbrial said. “There is a social revolution with a growing demand for participatory democracy.”
It is also easier, in a digital, globalized world, to know how the other half — or the 1 percent — live.
“There are not just new streams of information, but streams of people,” Van Stekelenburg said. “Those youngsters in the Arab Spring in all likelihood knew at least one person living overseas, and it creates a kind of relative deprivation — ‘I want to have that too.’”
The proliferation of protests is no guarantee that things will change.
“Staging [demonstrations] is no longer the difficult part,” said Youssef Cherif, a political analyst and one of the authors of new Carnegie Endowment research on the success of protest movements. “The problem is what to do after the protests, how to make your point and achieve the goals you’re protesting for. That proves to be the most difficult part.”
Protests and revolutions are defined by idealized slogans, but systematic change is harder work, he said.
“You can break off part of a system, but it’s very hard to break the whole structure, which is formed of institutions and networks that are difficult to break,” he said.
The leaderless nature of many of the protests makes them harder for authoritarian governments to quash, but it might also make the movements more difficult to sustain, said Sanjoy Chakravorty, a professor of global studies at Temple University.
“The movements that actually led to change or that were more sustained, they had a basis, a leadership structure, people articulating, organization, going door-to-door to get people to show up to a rally,” he said.
“The leadership question is central and that is the thing we haven’t figured out yet: how do we actually find leadership in these inchoate displays of anger?” he said.
HONG KONG
By Lily Kuo
Who is protesting?
The core of the protesters are young people, many of them university or secondary-school students. However, people from across society, from various sectors and age groups, have also joined the rallies and marches.
What are they protesting about?
Originally, a proposed change to an extradition law that would allow suspects to be transferred to mainland China and tried in courts controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. That bill has been withdrawn and now protesters are demonstrating against alleged police brutality and the government for its handling of the crisis. More broadly, they also oppose growing Chinese influence over the territory.
How are authorities reacting?
More than 2,000 people have been arrested, and police are deploying harsher measures to put down demonstrations, including tear gas, water cannons that drench people in blue dye laced with pepper solution and in some cases live rounds. Applications from civil society groups to hold rallies are increasingly being rejected. Colonial-era emergency regulations to ban people from wearing face masks at protests have been invoked.
What next?
Five months in, the number of people taking part in the protests has waned. Still, the unrest shows few signs of ending soon, as hardcore demonstrators vow to keep going until all their demands are met.
LEBANON
By Michael Safi
Who is protesting?
A cross-section of society appears to be represented, spanning the religious and political divides that sparked 15 years of civil war in Lebanon starting in 1975. About 1.3 million people, or 20 percent of the population, are thought to have attended the Oct. 20 demonstration, the largest so far.
What are they protesting about?
The government, an unsteady coalition, is divided and dysfunctional, unwilling or unable to invest in the nation’s crumbling roads, upgrade its electricity grid (power cuts are a daily problem), overhaul the waste collection system or address bulging youth unemployment, among a litany of other issues.
One of the triggers for the latest protests was a US$0.20 a day tax on WhatsApp calls that the government announced as part of a suite of austerity policies to bring the nation’s extremely high public debt burden under control.
How are authorities reacting?
Because the Cabinet is drawn from a finely balanced collection of sectarian political parties, it is impossible for the government to speak with one voice about the protests.
Generally speaking, political leaders across the spectrum have tried to sympathize with the protesters, but defended the system and called for the restoration of order. Last week, the Cabinet agreed to a package of reforms, including halving lawmakers’ salaries.
There have reportedly been some attempts by gunmen to intimidate protesters and the army has used tear gas against demonstrators, but the non-violent movement has generally been allowed to flourish, even as it has blocked roads and turned parts of cities into open-air dance parties.
On Tuesday, Saad Hariri resigned as prime minister.
What next?
There is excitement at the prospect of a new, united Lebanese identity being forged in the streets, but also concern that the nation’s deep political and religious divisions — and the system built on those divisions — could be reasserted, possibly through some act of sectarian violence.
The protest movement is leaderless and has no clear agenda, so even if it were able to dismiss the government, it is unclear what would emerge in its place.
CHILE
By Tom Phillips
Who is protesting?
The protests began in Santiago as a youth-led mutiny, and students remain at the movement’s heart. However, as the rebellion has swelled to towns and cities outside the capital, citizens of all ages and social classes have joined in.
Many protests have been peaceful, but there have been outbreaks of looting and arson attacks on supermarkets, underground stations, government buildings and the headquarters of one conservative newspaper.
What are they protesting about?
The demonstrations were initially a response to a rise in metro ticket prices. In the middle of this month, high-school students poured on to Santiago’s metro system as part of a fare-dodging campaign designed to force the government to scrap the increase.
The protests have since mutated into a far broader battle against inequality, deficient public services, poor wages and pensions and government repression.
How are authorities reacting?
The reaction of center-right Chilean President Sebasti Pinera was at first uncompromising. On Oct. 18, he declared a state of emergency and ordered thousands of troops on to the streets of Santiago.
On Oct. 20, Pinera declared Chile was “at war” with gangs of “evil” delinquents bent on causing destruction. More than 2,600 arrests have been made and at least 15 people have died, four reportedly at the hands of security forces.
Critics say the hardline stance has only inflamed the situation. Apparently grasping that, Pinera two days later adopted a softer tone, meeting opposition leaders and making a televised address in which he unveiled a series of new social policies, including a slight raise in the minimum wage. He apologized for the “shortsightedness” of the nation’s political leaders.
What next?
It is unclear whether Pinera’s attempt to de-escalate the situation would work, although with Chile set to host world leaders next month for the APEC summit, he will be hoping it does. One of the main rallying cries of the movement is that the protests are only just beginning.
“Chile desperto?” demonstrators have chanted this week. Chile has awoken.
CATALONIA
By Sam Jones
Who is protesting?
Most of the protesters who have gathered on the streets of Barcelona and other Catalan towns and cities are young, mainly in their teens and 20s. However, other demonstrations — including the peaceful protest in which an estimated 525,000 people gathered in Barcelona on Oct. 18 — have drawn people of all ages, from children to pensioners.
What are they protesting about?
Tensions in the region soared after the Spanish Supreme Court on Oct. 14 found nine Catalan separatists leaders guilty of sedition and misuse of public funds over their roles in a failed push for independence two years ago. They were sentenced to between nine and 13 years in prison.
Although the Catalan independence movement has always prided itself on peaceful protests, there have been numerous violent clashes, with police officers attacked with stones, bottles, Molotov cocktails and slingshots, and protesters beaten and shot with rubber and foam bullets.
How are authorities reacting?
About 600 people have received medical treatment and two of them — a police officer and a demonstrator — were in ritical condition. More than 200 people have been arrested.
The government in Madrid has said its priority is maintaining public order, and it has described its response so far as proportional. It has said cooperation between officers from the national police force and their Catalan counterparts has been very effective and it has rejected calls from right-wing parties to assume direct control of the Catalan police or use the constitution to implement direct rule.
The police response has been fiercely criticized by some for allegedly indiscriminately targeting innocent bystanders and members of the media.
Catalan President Quim Torra has also been criticized for taking too long to condemn the violence, and for calling for civil disobedience and then sending in the regional police to deal with it.
What next?
Things have calmed down significantly since the height of the protests. Torra has called for talks with the Spanish government, but has also threatened to protest against the Supreme Court verdict by staging another unilateral referendum on Catalan independence.
The Spanish government, led by Acting Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has dismissed the calls, accusing Torra’s administration of failing to do enough to guarantee public order and of ignoring the will of the majority of Catalans who oppose independence.
Even if the protests fade, the Catalan question will remain a key issue in Spain’s general election next month.
IRAQ
By Michael Safi
Who is protesting?
This month’s protests in Iraq were leaderless, but mostly driven by young and unemployed people in a country with a stubbornly high jobless rate and where nearly a quarter of the population live in poverty.
What are they protesting about?
After decades of sanctions, a US-led invasion and years of civil war, including against Islamic State, Iraq’s infrastructure has fallen into disrepair, its public services are inadequate and it is struggling to rebuild its economy. Corruption is endemic, a problem that the nation’s sectarian political parties have little appetite to try to change. Iraq’s protests are a howl of anger against the system.
One immediate trigger is also thought to be the demotion of Abdul-Wahab al-Saadi, an army officer who became prominent during the fight against the Islamic State group and was regarded as a rare hero across sectarian lines. The reason he lost his position has not been publicly explained, but many Iraqis suspect it is because he tried to fight corruption in the nation’s counterterrorism service.
How are authorities reacting?
Almost 150 people were killed over five intense days of the protests from Oct. 1 to 5, which the UN described as “senseless loss of life.”
About 70 percent died from bullet wounds to the head or chest, according to the findings of a government inquiry. The committee concluded that officers and commanders “lost control over their forces during the protests” and that this “caused chaos.” It found evidence that some protesters were killed by a sniper operating from an abandoned building in Baghdad.
The report called for dozens of senior security officials to be dismissed and referred to prosecutors for possible trial.
What next?
More than 250 people have died and thousands injured since the protests started this month.
Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi faces the prospect of being removed from office as his main backers have agreed to oust him, Reuters reported yesterday.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS