I was recently invited to serve on a foundation’s selection committee to choose the winners of a grant for low-income university students. Having to select 72 students out of more than 400 applicants made my heart sink.
Each choice was extremely difficult, because these applicants were all in harsh situations. Their predicaments were far beyond what the phrase “low-income” could accurately describe.
Having read the backgrounds of these students, I immediately started looking for information online about funding programs for low-income students provided by the Ministry of Education or universities, and I discovered two models worth further examination.
The regulations for national university funding programs for low-income students stipulate: “The grant pays NT$10,000 per semester to each sponsored student. The number of sponsorship places available is decided by a quota, which is 1.5 to 2 percent of the total student population of a university, or up to 2.2 percent, should it be necessary.”
This means that if the total number of students in a university is 12,000, at least 240 students per semester would benefit from the program. If a subsidy system were available at all universities, this would not only benefit disadvantaged students financially, but would also help them in other areas, such as providing them with support systems outside the school.
For example, a university could help students contact social welfare departments and apply for a family allowance, or contact medical institutions or long-term care services. This would allow the financial providers of a student’s household to continue working to look after any ill family members, which could otherwise result in an even worse financial situation.
The other model is a Ministry of Education program for the reduction and exemption of tuition and other fees, which was launched in 2007. The program aims to encourage disadvantaged students to attend school.
Students from families in the bottom 40th percentile of household income could be subsidized by the government. The program is implemented in four ways: scholarships, supplemental living stipends, emergency financial aid and accommodation discounts.
The aid programs should be expanded by increasing the universities’ self-raised funds and the subsidies provided by the ministry.
Moreover, according to regulations, disadvantaged students who receive a monthly living allowance of more than NT$6,000 are obliged to work as interns for the university, should the university provide such opportunities.
A common practice in these types of programs is to collaborate with the university’s part-time working system, giving subsidized students priority to work. By doing so, the students obtain opportunities to acquire practical skills and experience that could be applied to life and work.
People can refer to the three winners of this year’s Nobel Prize in Economics for a possible solution to provide timely help for young people who are pursuing degrees and help them ride out the storm, turning difficulty into hope.
Based on scientific evidence, the studies of Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer provide insights for government ministries, departments and schools into how to establish a comprehensive support system for disadvantaged students.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS