Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) 70 years ago, the country, under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), has had its fair share of successes and failures. After a great start that in the 1950s saw the Chinese peasantry break free from the yoke of serfdom and the establishment of a communist egalitarian society, came the disastrous Great Leap Forward in the 1960s and the Cultural Revolution in the 1970s: two decades of indisputable failures by the CCP to deliver on its promise to establish a prosperous society.
In the late 1970s, Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) introduced the “open door” policy that brought economic growth and prosperity to China. This economic growth has been the driving force behind the continuous development of the country’s infrastructure, and education and healthcare systems. Today, the large majority of Chinese enjoy living standards that they could not have dreamed of just a generation ago.
A World Bank report shows that since the introduction of market reforms 40 years ago, about 850 million Chinese have been lifted out of poverty. This near-miraculous achievement is the result of the hard work of the Chinese people and the effective leadership of the CCP. Together, they have turned poverty-stricken dysfunctional China into a prosperous and powerful country.
The socioeconomic improvements can be seen in every domain. While in the late 1970s access to higher education and proper healthcare was the privilege of a few, today most Chinese have access to them. As for working conditions, in the 1980s they were often extenuating and hazardous, and the average Chinese worker would be poorly remunerated.
Today, most Chinese enjoy good working conditions and income. While in the 1980s freedom of movement was practically nonexistent because of bureaucratic barriers and substandard infrastructure, today Chinese enjoy freedom of movement, and state of the art road, rail and air infrastructures.
Internationally, China has also made significant progress. It went from being a minor player in the 1970s to a dominant one today. China has managed to develop increasingly strong economic relations with almost every other country in the world, making it the largest contributor to economic growth in the developing world.
China has the capacity and the willingness to invest in infrastructure in almost every country, including in those countries where no one else is willing to do so. Countries such as Pakistan and Angola would be hopeless without China’s investment.
Moreover, China’s relations with most countries are mutually beneficial and respectful. The CCP claims that it uses its newly acquired global influence to promote peaceful development and, as put by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), to build an “international community with a shared destiny for mankind.”
There is a long list of domestic and international achievements that China and the CCP could have proudly showcased at its 70th anniversary celebration. Why then did they choose to focus only on its massive military might? The domestic message was clear: The CCP is powerful, Chinese people are in good hands, and can be proud of their leadership and country.
As for its international message, the CCP wanted to send a stern warning to dissenters in Hong Kong and its neighbor Taiwan, as well as to international actors challenging China in general.
This warning was explicit in Xinhua news agency’s central headline for the event: “Xi says no force can ever undermine China’s status.”
As for the CCP’s willingness — or, rather, its eagerness — to go to war over any significant disagreements, the Chinese defense minister’s words were clear: “Fight? We are ready. China will not be bullied.”
Hong Kongers should realize that they cannot rely on the “one country, two systems” policy. Since before the founding of the PRC, the CCP has followed a well-known Machiavellian strategy — “The promise given was a necessity of the past: the word broken is a necessity of the present.”
To gain support from ethnic minorities during the Chinese Civil War, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) assured them that they would be allowed to choose between joining the new China or establishing independent states. Just after the success of the communist revolution, he retracted his promise and forced them to join his China.
Look also at China’s handling of territorial disputes in the South China Sea, which initially was cloaked under a disguise of friendly cooperation. Now that China has built and consolidated its military bases in the region, there is almost no space for negotiation, because China argues that its territorial rights in the region are indisputable and that it is willing to defend them using its far superior military might.
By implementing the “one country, two systems” model, the CCP promised Hong Kong high levels of political, economic and social autonomy. This model is about to be replaced by the “one country, one system” model, ie, China and the CCP.
The CCP is just waiting for the right timing — which could come sooner rather than later — to enforce a change that would result in its full supervision of the political, economic, cultural and social lives of Hong Kongers.
The CCP’s desire to control everything and everyone is rooted in its belief that to ensure its own survival it must preserve China’s prosperity, which, in turn, depends on maintaining domestic sociopolitical stability.
To achieve this, the CCP believes it must homogenize the multicultural and multiethnic Chinese family. Therefore, it cannot allow any kind of significant dissent or diversity within China.
Currently, the most obvious of these social homogenization processes is the forceful assimilation of Uighurs in Xinjiang. They are seeing how their cultural and religious rights enshrined in China’s constitution are being drastically and swiftly eroded.
Unfortunately for dissenting Hong Kongers, they cannot realistically expect any fate other than being forcefully assimilated into the Han Chinese communist family. If they resist, the CCP has warned them that it is willing to use brute force.
China’s 70th anniversary celebrations could have been an opportunity for the CCP to highlight the fact that 850 million people have been lifted out of poverty or that China enjoys state-of-the-art infrastructure, and healthcare and education systems.
For its international audience, it could have showcased its successful promotion of peaceful development to build an “international community with a shared destiny for mankind.”
Instead, the CCP chose to display its military might with a massive and meticulously planned military parade to accompany Xi’s assertive and bellicose discourse. It seems that the time for preaching peaceful and harmonious development and relations is over. The time is ripe for the CCP to forcefully homogenize China and impose its will internationally. Hong Kong and Taiwan cannot expect to be spared.
Patrik Meyer is a visiting professor at Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta in Indonesia.
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
The Russian city of Vladivostok lies approximately 45km from the Sino-Russian border on the Sea of Japan. The area was not always Russian territory: It was once the site of a Chinese settlement. The settlement would later be known as Yongmingcheng (永明城), the “city of eternal light,” during the Yuan Dynasty. That light was extinguished in 1858 when a large area of land was ceded by the Qing Dynasty to the Russian Empire with the signing of the Treaty of Aigun. The People’s Republic of China founded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has never ruled Taiwan. Taiwan was governed by the
The Japanese-language Nikkei Shimbun on Friday published a full-page story calling for Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) leadership hopefuls to be aware of and to prepare for a potential crisis in the Taiwan Strait. The candidates of the LDP leadership race must have a “vision” in case of a Chinese invasion in Taiwan, the article said, adding that whether the prospective president of the LDP and the future prime minister of Japan have the ability to lead the public and private sectors under this circumstance would be examined in the coming election. The “2027 Theory” of a Taiwan contingency is becoming increasingly
RSS