More than 200,000 people on Saturday marched to celebrate LGBT+ pride in the first Taiwan LGBT Pride parade since Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage in May.
While the legalization of same-sex marriage highlights a major human rights achievement for Taiwan and exemplifies the ideals of a pluralistic, diverse and liberal society that it should be proud of, it does not mean that everything is rosy, as indicated by the parade’s slogan: “Treat gay people as if they were your friendly neighbors.”
Commenting on the slogan, event convener Cheng Chi-wei (鄭智偉) of the Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association said he hopes that people “embrace the fact that members of gender minorities are their neighbors, relatives or colleagues.”
Compared with many countries, Taiwan is a progressive, safe and inclusive society. However, people cannot turn a blind eye to blatant problems, such as open discrimination against and mistreatment of Southeast Asian immigrants, for example. Things have improved significantly over the past decade, but that does not mean the struggle is over.
The same goes for the LGBT+ community. As indicated by last year’s referendum results, in which a majority voted against same-sex rights, much more education is needed.
The legalization of same-sex marriage for so long seemed like the endgame, as it constituted much of the discussion in past parades and LGBT+ events, but in reality, it is just the first victory on the road to equality.
The government should be lauded for supporting LGBT+ events and exhibitions, such as this week’s “Future is Now” exhibition at Vieshow Cinema Square, and international forums such as last week’s EU-Taiwan LGBTI Human Rights Conference.
However, as long as there is discrimination, no matter how subtle, and as long as there are employers who do not offer the same privileges to gay people as they do to heterosexual workers, students who are bullied at school for being “different,” parents who speak out against gender equity education and gay people who are terrified of coming out to their family, the marches and activism must go on.
Saturday’s parade was indeed a celebration, but it was also an announcement that the community will continue to be seen and heard. That more than 30 corporations and various countries’ representative offices attended the march is a good sign of leading by example.
However, certain issues need to be worked out, such as adoption rights and transnational same-sex marriages involving a person from a nation where same-sex marriage is illegal, but the biggest hurdle is gender equity education, especially as it involves the entire society.
The problem is that a majority of voters rejected LGBT+ education in schools through two referendum questions. The government in April removed language requiring the teaching of “gay and lesbian education” from the Enforcement Rules for Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法施行細則), but replaced it with broader terms of “different genders, gender characteristics, gender temperaments, gender identity, and sexual orientation.”
This led to a heated debate during a public hearing at the Legislative Yuan on Thursday, as opposition groups called it a violation of referendum results.
The wording, while more inclusive, can be interpreted in different ways, and the debate regarding whether it followed the referendum is likely to continue. Either way, the government will likely face criticism for either not respecting the vote results or not respecting human rights.
Human rights should never be put to a vote, but that is what happened. It will be interesting to see how the government proceeds.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS