More than 200,000 people on Saturday marched to celebrate LGBT+ pride in the first Taiwan LGBT Pride parade since Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage in May.
While the legalization of same-sex marriage highlights a major human rights achievement for Taiwan and exemplifies the ideals of a pluralistic, diverse and liberal society that it should be proud of, it does not mean that everything is rosy, as indicated by the parade’s slogan: “Treat gay people as if they were your friendly neighbors.”
Commenting on the slogan, event convener Cheng Chi-wei (鄭智偉) of the Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association said he hopes that people “embrace the fact that members of gender minorities are their neighbors, relatives or colleagues.”
Compared with many countries, Taiwan is a progressive, safe and inclusive society. However, people cannot turn a blind eye to blatant problems, such as open discrimination against and mistreatment of Southeast Asian immigrants, for example. Things have improved significantly over the past decade, but that does not mean the struggle is over.
The same goes for the LGBT+ community. As indicated by last year’s referendum results, in which a majority voted against same-sex rights, much more education is needed.
The legalization of same-sex marriage for so long seemed like the endgame, as it constituted much of the discussion in past parades and LGBT+ events, but in reality, it is just the first victory on the road to equality.
The government should be lauded for supporting LGBT+ events and exhibitions, such as this week’s “Future is Now” exhibition at Vieshow Cinema Square, and international forums such as last week’s EU-Taiwan LGBTI Human Rights Conference.
However, as long as there is discrimination, no matter how subtle, and as long as there are employers who do not offer the same privileges to gay people as they do to heterosexual workers, students who are bullied at school for being “different,” parents who speak out against gender equity education and gay people who are terrified of coming out to their family, the marches and activism must go on.
Saturday’s parade was indeed a celebration, but it was also an announcement that the community will continue to be seen and heard. That more than 30 corporations and various countries’ representative offices attended the march is a good sign of leading by example.
However, certain issues need to be worked out, such as adoption rights and transnational same-sex marriages involving a person from a nation where same-sex marriage is illegal, but the biggest hurdle is gender equity education, especially as it involves the entire society.
The problem is that a majority of voters rejected LGBT+ education in schools through two referendum questions. The government in April removed language requiring the teaching of “gay and lesbian education” from the Enforcement Rules for Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法施行細則), but replaced it with broader terms of “different genders, gender characteristics, gender temperaments, gender identity, and sexual orientation.”
This led to a heated debate during a public hearing at the Legislative Yuan on Thursday, as opposition groups called it a violation of referendum results.
The wording, while more inclusive, can be interpreted in different ways, and the debate regarding whether it followed the referendum is likely to continue. Either way, the government will likely face criticism for either not respecting the vote results or not respecting human rights.
Human rights should never be put to a vote, but that is what happened. It will be interesting to see how the government proceeds.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS