Saleem said he can still see the faces of the young men he shot.
More than a decade after sniper duty in the Lebanon-Israel war of 2006, he still has nightmares.
“In this region we have a saying that a young man is like a rose,” he said, then breaks off for a moment and does not finish the sentence.
Saleem’s first marriage broke down after the end of the war. His children stayed with him. He admits he was probably hard to live with.
“I never talked about the war. I never talked about it at all. I locked everything away,” he said.
After the war, he drove refuse trucks for a while. Now he is a taxi driver. He has remarried, but he does not speak to his new wife about the war.
“I don’t like to leave the children,” he said. “I don’t like to be outside the house at night. For years and years I didn’t want to talk about it at all, but now I look online at night to try to understand.”
Saleem’s experiences since the war sounds familiar to researchers who deal with post-traumatic stress disorder, but what about his family’s?
There is a growing interest in the idea of transgenerational trauma (TGT) — trauma that is somehow transmitted from parent to child and on down the generations.
Saleem is careful with his children, and probably even over-protective of them, but what about others? He knows men who cannot stop themselves from raging at their children, shouting, lashing out.
“Sometimes the children are the same way,” Saleem said. “They see how their fathers are and they think this is the way to be.”
For Joseph El-Khoury, a Lebanese psychiatrist who works with members of the militias that fought in the conflicts that have shaken Lebanon over the past 50 years, Saleem’s account is no surprise.
The men he deals with are “very angry and resentful, and what they choose, a lot of them, is just to completely withdraw, do the minimum ... you’ve learned that by serving or being part of a group you sacrificed yourself, lost friends and you’re not better off,” El-Khoury said.
The resentment, the anger, he said, is being taught to a newer, younger generation.
“They hold the political views and the social views that link to that conflict, but they don’t make that connection,” El-Khoury said.
You can see it in small ways, for example in the geography of the town, or who hangs out where, he said.
“There are no barriers, but there are mental barriers, psychological barriers,” El-Khoury said.
Trauma is what happens in our mind as a result of a particular event or series of events. It will affect different people differently: Some might be fine or suffer only a few consequences, while for others the effects could evolve into post-traumatic stress disorder or depression.
For many years conflict was seen as the main culprit, but increasingly physical and sexual abuse are thought to be triggers too.
“One aspect of suffering one or several traumas is a greater susceptibility to stress,” said Peter Fonagy, a psychoanalyst, clinical psychologist and chief executive of the London-based Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families.
In 1966, a Montreal-based psychiatrist called Vivian Rakoff said that he was seeing greater numbers of adolescent offspring of Holocaust survivors.
“It is almost as if their parents, in an attempt to justify their survival, demanded qualities of their children which were the accumulation of their expectations of all the dead who were murdered,” he said.
Since then, there have been many studies looking at, for example, the children of holocaust survivors, the grandchildren of holocaust survivors, the children of prisoners of war in the US civil war, and families in Northern Ireland and in the Middle East.
There is also a growing body of research into more indirect effects of large historical traumas, such as the eviction of Native Americans, or the enslavement and transport of Africans to the US.
The results are not entirely clear. There are studies that do find negative effects — that the children of holocaust survivors, for example, can experience emotional problems of their own, difficulties in relationships, in the way they function.
Researchers in Northern Ireland concluded that the transmission of trauma to children of victims of the Troubles made them more prone to developing toxic stress in childhood.
However, some research has ended up in an entirely different place, finding that trauma in a parents’ life can lead to higher resilience in children, and even more studies have concluded that there is no clear effect whatsoever.
If trauma is being passed from one generation to the next, what is the mechanism of transmission? Some interesting work is being done around epigenetics — the idea that the trauma could cause genetic changes that are then transmitted to your offspring, but epigenetics is a young and and still unproven field.
The main mechanism appears to be simply the parenting style of the traumatized parent. Basically, are they a good mum or dad?
In an ideal world, as a baby you have a primary caregiver who mirrors you — who smiles when you smile, and so on, Fonagy said.
“You internalize that and it becomes you,” he said.
The problems arise when the parent is unable, perhaps because of trauma, to perform that role.
“When you have someone who has been very neglected, where no one has held up a mirror, then you have a gap there, a blank, a nothing, and when you are maltreated, you take that experience of maltreatment as you,” Fonagy said.
Research on rats has shown that when mothers are stressed in pregnancy or do not care properly for their babies, the offspring tend to become more stressed themselves, impairing memory and learning abilities.
If trauma can be transmitted down through the generations, what kind of mitigation can be done? Some countries have recognized the potential dangers and are trying to stem them. Much work has been done in Northern Ireland, for example, to mitigate the effect of the Troubles on the older and younger generations.
The Wave trauma centers are government and EU-funded centers that provide counseling and psychotherapy and also run community courses on the effect that trauma can have on the family, but in Lebanon, resources are thinner.
For every 100,000 people, Lebanon has about three psychologists and three mental health nurses. Western nations typically have scores or even hundreds.
Stigma aggravates the problem, El-Khoury said.
“We struggle to get people into clinics, because they fear the stigma of seeing a psychiatrist,” he said.
Fonagy suggests the best possible treatment for trauma is not professional, but social. Social networks, community, family, trusting relationships can help people to develop the capacity to reflect and overcome their experiences.
“Adversity turns into trauma when the mind experiences itself as being in isolation,” Fonagy said. “The tragedy is, of course, that the very experience that caused the trauma — like war — will destroy the social networks needed to overcome it.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS