The draft foreign influence transparency act and an amendment to the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸人民關係條例修正草案), jointly promoted by the Taiwan Statebuilding Party and the Democratic Progressive Party, have passed the first reading in the current session at the legislature. One of the objectives of the bills is to curb China’s “grand external propaganda” aimed at influencing and undermining Taiwan’s democracy.
The “grand external propaganda,” also known as “China’s grand strategy for external propaganda,” was initiated during the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, when the torch relay was met with protests in many of the countries it passed through as the international community expressed support and sympathy for the Tibetan people who went to the extremes of self-immolation in protest against Chinese oppression.
To improve its negative image in the international community, China announced in January 2009 that it would invest 540 billion yuan (US$76.42 billion at the current exchange rate) in the promotion of the “official Chinese opinion” by setting up television stations and buying media outlets around the world, or by collaborating with willing international media outlets.
In August 2013, soon after he took office, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a speech at the National Conference on Ideological Advocacy Work in China that “we must work meticulously to do good external propaganda, innovate external propaganda methods ... and tell the Chinese story well and spread the Chinese voice well.” What this means is using big money to win the right to set the agenda and brainwash people around the world.
In contrast, pro-Chinese media outlets here in Taiwan have long been allowed to disseminate the official views of Chinese government, leading many Taiwanese to interpret international affairs in the same way China does.
Take the US-China trade dispute, for example: Many Taiwanese believe that China is winning the trade war, not to mention that many people simply do not know that the trade dispute has led to sharp decline of the Chinese economy.
Based on this understanding, a record number of Taiwanese students were sent to China by their parents to attend college last year. The unemployment rate among Chinese university graduates is a state secret in China, but according to data gathered secretly by many scholars, it is as high as 40 percent.
Still, influenced by the propaganda of pro-Chinese media here in Taiwan, Taiwanese parents think that the future of Taiwan’s younger generation lies in China.
These examples show that some Taiwanese have been brainwashed by the pro-unification media and that they, without even being aware of it, have gradually come to view the world through the filter of the Chinese government. Is the China presented in the “grand external propaganda” the real China? It is time that Taiwanese start thinking clearly about this.
Wu Cheng-yin is a software engineer and a member of the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS