When Gabon ratified the 2015 Paris climate agreement, the country’s real work was just beginning. The main challenge was to find ways to conserve the country’s natural environment and address the growing climate crisis, while not limiting economic opportunities for its people. Almost four years later, we have a deeper understanding of the crisis facing us, and the need to reconcile our country’s development with its climate response is greater and more urgent than ever.
Developing countries such as ours cannot follow the same development path that Western economies have taken over the past century and a half. We know the dire consequences of rapid industrialization for the global climate and environment, so we must find a different way to improve living standards.
It is only right, therefore, that advanced economies provide additional technological and financial assistance to the developing world. After all, this is the price of our shared responsibility for the planet, but climate solutions will not come solely from the West. Developing countries — including Gabon — have an opportunity to lead this transformation.
Economic growth need not conflict with environmental protection and climate mitigation. In Gabon, the government is committed to reducing national greenhouse-gas emissions by at least 50 percent by 2025. As minister of forests, oceans, environment and climate change and the head of the National Climate Council respectively, we know that stewardship of the rainforests that cover nearly nine-10ths of the country will help us achieve this goal, but we also know that our forests and natural resources are vital for economic and social development.
How can Gabon reconcile these apparently contradictory objectives? How can we develop our agriculture and timber sectors, which are critical to enhancing food security and diversifying the economy, while also meeting our international climate commitments and protecting Gabon’s rich biodiversity? The answer lies in planning intelligently and reducing wasteful damage so that our forests and lands can serve as both a natural brake on climate change and a foundation for sustainable development.
Gabon intends to meet the majority of its climate commitment through improved forestry practices, which can reduce carbon dioxide emissions while maintaining wood production. Together with The Nature Conservancy, the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI) and the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, the government is launching a nationwide initiative to reduce the contribution of logging to climate change and biodiversity loss.
In 2017, we conducted a baseline study to quantify the impact of existing logging practices. Over the next 12 months, we will work with concession managers to make improvements, such as narrowing logging roads, reducing wood waste and using more low-impact equipment. We will then conduct a follow-up study to measure the effect of the changes.
The latest research shows that whereas selective logging typically damages 11 to 33 percent of the remaining forest, a well-managed forest can retain up to 96 percent of its carbon and 85 percent or more of its biodiversity. By quantifying these impact reductions, we can contribute to our shared climate commitments under the Paris agreement, as well as to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
By developing a more sustainable and climate-friendly logging industry, Gabon can lead by example. We understand the economic imperatives of industries that help to raise living standards, but we also realize that if we fail to safeguard our forests and natural landscapes, we will not achieve the aims of the Paris accord. Moreover, any economic gains will be short-lived.
Although dramatic fossil-fuel reductions are essential, we can avoid a climate crisis only if we enhance nature’s capacity to combat global warming. That means harnessing the power of tropical forests to absorb the carbon dioxide that has been emitted. Such natural solutions could potentially provide one-third of the climate response that we need by 2030 to keep global warming below the thresholds targeted by the Paris agreement.
Gabon is at the heart of a Central African carbon-sequestering powerhouse. In 2015, Gabon and five neighboring countries established the CAFI with the aim of recognizing and preserving the value of the region’s forests, which together form the second-largest tropical forest in the world, storing 70 gigatons of carbon and providing livelihoods for 60 million people.
The Congo Basin might be one-third of the size of the Amazon rainforest, but it stores 60 percent of the amount of carbon that the Amazon does and its annual carbon sequestration is proportionately higher. The CAFI is seeking to build on previous successes by making more ambitious commitments, improving coordination across existing initiatives, and bringing in new partners and donors.
We are encouraged by the progress we are making in Gabon and the Congo Basin region as a whole. The governments of developing countries need to build on this success and continue leading by example through their efforts to combat climate change, build resilience and promote sustainable development.
In that regard, the recent agreement between Norway and Gabon, facilitated by the CAFI, is a significant step in the right direction. Under this 10-year deal, Norway would pay Gabon a floor price of US$10 per certified ton for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions caused by deforestation and degradation, as well as for absorption of carbon dioxide by natural forests.
However, collectively, we can still do much more to protect and restore forests to combat climate change. Too many policymakers still harbor the misconception that economic development and climate action are incompatible. That is not the case, as we are proving in Gabon, but until more governments join us, the world will continue to fall short of its climate commitments.
The effects of climate change are not constrained by national borders. Only a truly global effort to reduce emissions and bolster carbon sinks will enable us to prevent an even worse climate crisis.
Lee White is the Gabonese minister of forests, oceans, environment and climate change. Tanguy Gahouma is the head of Gabon’s National Climate Council.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS