When Gabon ratified the 2015 Paris climate agreement, the country’s real work was just beginning. The main challenge was to find ways to conserve the country’s natural environment and address the growing climate crisis, while not limiting economic opportunities for its people. Almost four years later, we have a deeper understanding of the crisis facing us, and the need to reconcile our country’s development with its climate response is greater and more urgent than ever.
Developing countries such as ours cannot follow the same development path that Western economies have taken over the past century and a half. We know the dire consequences of rapid industrialization for the global climate and environment, so we must find a different way to improve living standards.
It is only right, therefore, that advanced economies provide additional technological and financial assistance to the developing world. After all, this is the price of our shared responsibility for the planet, but climate solutions will not come solely from the West. Developing countries — including Gabon — have an opportunity to lead this transformation.
Economic growth need not conflict with environmental protection and climate mitigation. In Gabon, the government is committed to reducing national greenhouse-gas emissions by at least 50 percent by 2025. As minister of forests, oceans, environment and climate change and the head of the National Climate Council respectively, we know that stewardship of the rainforests that cover nearly nine-10ths of the country will help us achieve this goal, but we also know that our forests and natural resources are vital for economic and social development.
How can Gabon reconcile these apparently contradictory objectives? How can we develop our agriculture and timber sectors, which are critical to enhancing food security and diversifying the economy, while also meeting our international climate commitments and protecting Gabon’s rich biodiversity? The answer lies in planning intelligently and reducing wasteful damage so that our forests and lands can serve as both a natural brake on climate change and a foundation for sustainable development.
Gabon intends to meet the majority of its climate commitment through improved forestry practices, which can reduce carbon dioxide emissions while maintaining wood production. Together with The Nature Conservancy, the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI) and the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, the government is launching a nationwide initiative to reduce the contribution of logging to climate change and biodiversity loss.
In 2017, we conducted a baseline study to quantify the impact of existing logging practices. Over the next 12 months, we will work with concession managers to make improvements, such as narrowing logging roads, reducing wood waste and using more low-impact equipment. We will then conduct a follow-up study to measure the effect of the changes.
The latest research shows that whereas selective logging typically damages 11 to 33 percent of the remaining forest, a well-managed forest can retain up to 96 percent of its carbon and 85 percent or more of its biodiversity. By quantifying these impact reductions, we can contribute to our shared climate commitments under the Paris agreement, as well as to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
By developing a more sustainable and climate-friendly logging industry, Gabon can lead by example. We understand the economic imperatives of industries that help to raise living standards, but we also realize that if we fail to safeguard our forests and natural landscapes, we will not achieve the aims of the Paris accord. Moreover, any economic gains will be short-lived.
Although dramatic fossil-fuel reductions are essential, we can avoid a climate crisis only if we enhance nature’s capacity to combat global warming. That means harnessing the power of tropical forests to absorb the carbon dioxide that has been emitted. Such natural solutions could potentially provide one-third of the climate response that we need by 2030 to keep global warming below the thresholds targeted by the Paris agreement.
Gabon is at the heart of a Central African carbon-sequestering powerhouse. In 2015, Gabon and five neighboring countries established the CAFI with the aim of recognizing and preserving the value of the region’s forests, which together form the second-largest tropical forest in the world, storing 70 gigatons of carbon and providing livelihoods for 60 million people.
The Congo Basin might be one-third of the size of the Amazon rainforest, but it stores 60 percent of the amount of carbon that the Amazon does and its annual carbon sequestration is proportionately higher. The CAFI is seeking to build on previous successes by making more ambitious commitments, improving coordination across existing initiatives, and bringing in new partners and donors.
We are encouraged by the progress we are making in Gabon and the Congo Basin region as a whole. The governments of developing countries need to build on this success and continue leading by example through their efforts to combat climate change, build resilience and promote sustainable development.
In that regard, the recent agreement between Norway and Gabon, facilitated by the CAFI, is a significant step in the right direction. Under this 10-year deal, Norway would pay Gabon a floor price of US$10 per certified ton for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions caused by deforestation and degradation, as well as for absorption of carbon dioxide by natural forests.
However, collectively, we can still do much more to protect and restore forests to combat climate change. Too many policymakers still harbor the misconception that economic development and climate action are incompatible. That is not the case, as we are proving in Gabon, but until more governments join us, the world will continue to fall short of its climate commitments.
The effects of climate change are not constrained by national borders. Only a truly global effort to reduce emissions and bolster carbon sinks will enable us to prevent an even worse climate crisis.
Lee White is the Gabonese minister of forests, oceans, environment and climate change. Tanguy Gahouma is the head of Gabon’s National Climate Council.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS