I joined teachers at my school for a meeting to evaluate the results of using mobile learning in Nantou County, and I am glad I did. It allowed me to see the willingness of teachers from 17 elementary and junior-high schools in the county to try to teach using tablet devices to give students a more diversified learning experience.
Nevertheless, no teaching method and no teaching aid offers a magical solution to every problem; they are all restricted in various ways when it comes to outcomes or suitability.
At the meeting, each school gave a short 10-minute presentation of their experience, and the evaluation committee was given 10 minutes for questions. The focus was on whether students’ results and learning abilities had improved, and whether their interaction with fellow students had increased. It was almost all positive.
Is this in line with reality? The Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine recently reported on educational changes in Sydney, Australia.
According to the article, teachers there have noticed that when tablets are used in the classroom, students are easily distracted and have problems concentrating, and it is affecting their reading comprehension. As a result, many schools are now returning to printed text books and making students take written notes.
Educational reform in Taiwan generally follows in the footsteps of Europe and the US, and when the Ministry of Education makes big budget allocations for schools to buy electronic devices, it is following the same general attitude and way of thinking.
Electronic devices should not be used in education for their own sake, they should be used because they are needed. In addition, an effort should be made to understand whether these electronic devices help or hurt teaching, and if they affect the well-being of students.
For example, the experience in Sydney schools is something that is likely to be encountered here in Taiwan as well. As so many schools have received the ministry’s subsidies and so many academics and experts have participated in evaluation committees to review these subsidies, they do not only consider the practical benefits, they also feel obliged to say something nice and help defend the ministry’s policy.
As a result, not a single school at the meeting evaluating the use of mobile devices as a teaching aid had discovered that tablets in the classroom could have a negative affect on students’ learning, nor did they suggest any practical teaching restrictions.
The result of this policy is that the autonomy that teachers should enjoy is circumscribed by a wave of technological teaching aids. Teachers who do not use tablets as a teaching aid are seen as a group that do not understand the need to develop teaching methodology.
As it has now become almost taken for granted that schools should obtain funds to buy electronic devices for use as teaching aids, doing so has also become a benchmark defining conscientious teaching, while no one says anything about the restrictions of electronic devices as a teaching aid or the potential negative effect on student learning.
This is not a good thing, and it is something that the ministry and teachers and students at all levels should discuss further.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS