Southeast Asian governments are banding together to take on global tech giants on issues including “fake news” and taxation, marking a new stage in the region’s approach to the Internet’s explosive growth.
The stakes are high for the governments, which are counting on the digital economy to drive growth and innovation amid domestic political tensions, and the companies, which view Southeast Asia’s social-media-loving population of 641 million as a key growth market.
The new initiatives, which have not previously been reported, include an effort by Indonesia to join forces with Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines in demanding action from Google, Facebook and other companies on content regulation and tax policy.
“Together, we are 80 percent of the region,” said Indonesian Minister of Communications and Information Technology Rudiantara, who uses only one name.
Indonesia is already preparing legislation requiring tech companies with online services to pay value-added tax on local sales, even when they are booked offshore.
Meanwhile, Thailand’s telecom regulator, in a meeting with regional counterparts late last month, proposed that all 10 members of ASEAN require Internet and streaming video firms to set up domestic “verification centers” to combat false news.
Thailand also urged discussion of how to demand “economic contributions” from the Internet firms, whether through taxes or fees, according to a copy of a speech seen by reporters.
The council of ASEAN telecoms regulators has accepted Thailand’s proposal for the centers, and a separate document with guidelines for economic contribution is expected to be formally adopted at the ASEAN summit in November, a source in the Thai regulatory agency with knowledge of the talks said.
“ASEAN as a group gives us enough leverage, and our combined user base on services like Facebook is big enough to lend us negotiating power,” the source said.
The initiatives reflect widespread concern that Internet services, to which most people in the region have gained access only in the past few years, are fanning ethnic and religious animosities, while avoiding paying their fair share.
Activist groups are nervous about the potential for institutionalized censorship. According to Freedom House’s Freedom on the Net survey last year, all Southeast Asian countries rank as either not free or partly free.
Governments in the region could use the label “fake news” to target dissidents, said Emilie Pradichit, director of the Thailand-based Manushya Foundation, which advocates for online rights.
She called on companies to resist such attempts.
“We believe the governments should themselves not use untrue information to achieve goals that are to their advantage, and private sector organizations, such as Facebook, should take the lead in protecting netizens’ online freedom,” Pradichit said.
The Asia Internet Coalition (AIC), which counts Internet giants Facebook, Google, Amazon, Twitter and messaging app Line among its members, said ASEAN risks hurting the digital economy unless the new policies are “right.”
“The potential of the region’s digital economy ... will likely be blunted by overregulation or indiscriminate taxes and fees,” AIC director Jeff Paine said, urging governments to focus on “industry partnerships and collaborations.”
It is not yet clear what level of support the new proposals enjoy and how they might be implemented in coming months. Indonesia’s plan follows its successful effort to get Alphabet’s Google to pay taxes on Indonesia-related advertising revenue booked at its Asia headquarters in Singapore.
“Other countries asked me how we were able to achieve that, so I offered to them that they piggyback off Indonesia to deal with the platforms,” Rudiantara said.
He said that he also persuaded social media giants Telegram and Tik-Tok to establish content monitoring teams in Indonesia.
Rudiantara is now planning a “three letter system” in which if a platform fails to respond to three government requests to engage on an issue, he can ban them.
The proposal to neighboring countries includes a shared channel to communicate with the companies.
The Thai regulator wants to require Internet companies to set up and fund “verification centers” in each Southeast Asian country.
Singapore has already passed a complex “fake news” law requiring Internet companies to label or remove content deemed untrue.
The Thai proposal aims to ensure that companies take quick action on fake news and fake accounts. Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube all have elaborate policies on what is allowed on their platforms and generally ban fake accounts, deceptive practices and hate speech.
However, content that is simply false is usually allowed.
“They said they already have a fast process to tackle issues, but we insisted it’s still too slow,” Thai National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission Secretary-General Takorn Tantasith said.
Officials in Cambodia, Indonesia, and the Philippines said that they support the verification center plan, saying fake news is a core national concern.
Philippine Undersecretary of Information and Communications Technology for Operations Eliseo Rio said that the country’s authorities are also working on a “one-stop” content reviewing mechanism, where if one country decides something is disinformation, the company would have to remove it altogether and not just block it locally.
“The individual governments can conclude these are fake,” he added.
Rights watchdogs have warned that media freedom is declining in the Philippines, with several officials accused of propagating disinformation campaigns against opponents.
However, sources familiar with the regulators’ proceedings said that support for the verification centers is not unanimous across Asia. Three executives at targeted companies said they do not believe the idea will work, in part because it includes a wide range of global companies.
Facebook, Line, Amazon, Netflix and Walt Disney were among those that attended a meeting last month with regulators to discuss the proposal.
Google and Netflix declined to comment, while Amazon, Facebook, Line and Walt Disney did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Singapore and Indonesia already plan to impose goods and services taxes on foreign companies offering digital services, and talks are ongoing among Southeast Asian regulators for a region-wide effort.
That topic was also discussed in the industry meeting.
“Missing income is also a problem, and we asked for their cooperation on this too,” Takorn said.
Additional reporting by Prak Chan Thul, Neil Jerome Morales and Liz Lee
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS